Thread 82892517

>ban porn to protect kids!
>ban discord to protect kids!
>ban twitter to protect kids!
>ban [any form of digital media] to protect kids!
Wouldn't it be simpler to just ban kids from using the web? Both underages and the rest of the internet would benefit from that.
not that I know how to effectively do that

what, and expect parents to take an active role in their children's lives and actually enforce digital boundaries? that's insane

>>82892537
>that's insane
insane is the antisemitism that makes people want to deprive social media companies from the billions of profit

in some self-regulatory way kids, teenagers, and even young adults infantilise themselves. i don't get it. when i was 10 years old, i had to check a box to sign up for forums
>I agree that I am 13 years of age or older.

the Discord generation says shit like "U25s: DNI" and thinks being at the age of consent is "grooming" (almost the opposite of its old paedophilic meaning). it's of their own volition. wut.

>>82892558
>U25s: DNI
huh?

>>82892564
"(to) under-25s: do not interact". i've seen it grow from "minors: do not interact" to "18" to "21" to "25" (the whole brain elasticity thing).

it's 99% Twitter insanity. but it's caught on a lot more than i'd like.

>>82892558
>>82892564
under 25s, do not interact?

>>82892588
nice, I've guessed correctly
twitter people and social media people just try their best to have witches to hunt
I've made the thread to talk about kids under 16 though. Should've probably specified that first.

>>82892517 (OP)
It wouldn't, no.
We just need to kill pedos

>>82892796
>We just need to kill pedos
nigga, it isn't as simple as "just"
unless you were intending to show how angry you are about some unspecified group of people, then my bad

>>82892604
>I've made the thread to talk about kids under 16 though. Should've probably specified that first.
fair. but as long as they're old enough to read and write, they'll want to go on message boards, play online games. i don't want any harm to come to children obviously, but i also wouldn't support outright banning these things from them.
all the same harms and evils exist in the real world.

and i mean really, if you're a 13/f/cali girl on Habbo Hotel and a middle-aged man tries to cyber, just don't do it. nothing actually happens.

>>82892867
>13/f/cali girl on Habbo Hotel
I feel like some unc ahh mfer because I don't know what "cali" (california?) and "habbo hotel" are.
Going back to the point, I dislike the digitalization of social life in general. It's like the internet becomes the goal rather than a utility in life.
>just don't do it
given how stupid kids, especially girls are, I doubt they won't do it

>>82892517 (OP)
>ban kids to protect kids!

>>82892796
In the near future you will get a visit from thought police for expressing such antisemitic sentiments.

>>82892517 (OP)
>not that I know how to effectively do that
limit screen time
internet should be for pirating books and watching educational (think khanacademy and crafting instructions, not vsauce) youtube videos