The way women are clearly naturally selected to be raped seems to be counter productive for assuring your lineage survives long-term. It seems like having weak, rapeable women would allow other males to sully your tribe quite easily.
I wonder if there is evidence for beauty or neotenic traits making life SAFER rather than more dangerous. Perhaps humans are inclined to feel more protective and defensive for beautiful and cute counterparts. It would explain why mate guarding is still so prevalent in men, despite monogamy being normalized to the point that polygamy is shamed by both the East and West.
>>82916957 >making life SAFER
definitely not. I'm a tall not cute girl and have had female friends who are short and small and they've been abused/raped. I've never had to endure that because men know I could beat them
>>82917714
how young do you have to be to think thats weird? most men are horny pathetic animals that throw their money at any woman who so much as shows a leg at them.
>>82917713
You could not beat any men, don't delude yourself. I have never felt physically threatened by any women, even athletic ones, because women just aren't strong.
>>82916817 (OP)
she is obviously a whore. I feel bad for miz in a way, was trying to make her more trad.
When she talked about stalkers, that is only bring more attention ie more stalkers.
It's a mess and doesn't surprise me desu