Thread 83068393

what is with everyone inserting charlie kirks face into an image? is this what his legacy will be?

>>83068393 (OP)
the left can't meme this is just sad

>>83068393 (OP)
His legacy is nick fuentes reinventing the GOP, making way for fascism.

>>83068403
haha gay sex. We have gay ass sex with men.

>>83068393 (OP)
i would smash anons :)

>>83068393 (OP)
>s this what his legacy will be?
it's just copying the george floyd face meme. right was pretty original, left just copies

>>83068409
:) go fuck yourself fag

>>83068407
>>83068407
This is true, all of Charlie's views were just a few years behind Nick's views, and in his attempt to capture the right, he was just funneling it to Nick. Dude was not intelligent at all, was just a propagandist for Trump.

>>83068393 (OP)
The psychosexual nature of political discourse in the 21st century is really quite bizarre. Adding the face of someone you hate to a picture where you are either raping them (a crime) or having consensual sex with them (implying that having consensual gay sex is somehow humiliating) is... kind of layered.

>>83068625
Did you know that people used to make fun of Julius Caesar for being a gay bottom

Its always been this way

>>83068590
idea killing him would save israel sounds insane since now conservative movement is being swallowed by anti israeli figures

>>83068875
Right normal people have always found fags disgusting and worthy of mockery since the dawn of time

>>83068875
>>83068902
I don't feel like the people calling others gay bitchboys as an insult in the past were making POV porn images of their opponents being fucked in the ass. It's layered. Sexualising your opposition via pornography, implying that they are lesser for being gay, and also backing a socio-political position that insists being gay is normal and not deviant at the same time is extremely schizophrenic compared to saying "lol ur gay".