>>22236694
Kek... you want to argue semantics instead of the spirit of the thread, let's do that.
> If it's made of silicone, it isn't a tit
Cambridge and Oxford:
> either of the two soft, rounded parts of a woman's chest that produce milk after she has a baby
A woman with breast implants, in many cases, still has the glands and hormones to produce milk and breast feed. That an implant augments the shape does not preclude the breast from being a breast.
But let's take this a step further: post menopause, most women are unable to lactate. Does this mean that women postmenopause stop having breasts? They are still recommended to go for mammograms to screen for breast cancer. Likewise for women with implants. How can a woman with implants get breast cancer with your definition?
> If it's man made, it isn't godly
OP didn't say made by G*d, he said G*d tier, as in "at the same level as". Even your use of godly means in reverence of. Creating art in appreciation of and with reverence for G*d's divine powers satisfies the OPs definition while not explicitly being made by G*d.
Your play
