>>22267044
not if neither of them know the name
so, source?
>>22265939
>You’re not important.
nta, but he's apparently important enough for you to reply?
and is being lustful on imageboards even comparable to whoring yourself out? hell, if you want to pretend that our fathers didn't scout out porn mags when they were younger, you're just mistaken.
plenty of people consume porn, but not many make being a sex toy their whole existence.