Thread 12513052

Thesis: girls are stupid and smelly.
Antithesis: boys are stupid and smelly.
Synthesis: boys and girls are stupid and smelly.

grikls arent stupid and smelly tho

>>12513056
they have girl bacteria

>>12513062
that makes them smart and nice smelling

>>12513067
hote

>>12513073
not all bacteria is bad some have a probiotic effect

>>12513067
hello, this is a false cause fallacy, because you are assuming that just because bacteria is present, girls smell nice. this ignores all other hormonal and biological factors. this is also a hasty generalization, because it assumes that all girls smell good due to bacteria

>>12513062
mmm girl bacteria

>>12513077 dubs
it was proven by science that girl bacteria causes the nice smell they did studies

>>12513093
>it was proven by science that girl bacteria causes the nice smell they did studies
this is a appeal to anonymous authority aka a FALLACY, as you did not specify the studies, which makes this a vague appeal to authority.
this is also circular reasoning, because you are only claiming that the studies exist, without any evidence

>>12513075
this is nice board

Your fortune: You will meet a dark handsome stranger

>>12513096
u can argue with me but u cant argue with the lab results

Metaphysical Negation: The earthquake destroyed the house.
Dialectical Negation: The house was impacted by the external force of an earthquake, which caused it to collapse, due to internal characteristics of the house itself (which could not withstand the forces of the earthquake). The debris from the collapsed house will be cleared away, and will continue to develop. The space where the house stood will also continue to develop in some way, with the earthquake and the resulting collapse serving as the basis for this further development.

Metaphysical Negation: Water eroded the mountain.
Dialectical Negation: The external force of water caused erosion by transferring material away from the mountain, due to the internal characteristics of the mountain’s composite material. The water, the material which was washed away, and the mountain will all continue to develop. The erosion process will be the basis for this further development.

Metaphysical Negation: The car has a new tire because it ran over a nail.
Dialectical Negation: The external force of the nail caused the tire to permanently deflate, due to the internal characteristics of the tire, which could not withstand running over a nail. This served as the basis for further development: the old tire was removed and will be disposed of, which will serve as the basis for further development (i.e., the tire may be recycled or sent to a landfill); the removal of the tire serves as the basis for the further development of a new tire being installed.

Your fortune: Bad Luck

>>12513103
again, appeal to anonymous authority
in order to escape your fallacy you have to provide the studies

>>12513111
facts dont care about ur fallacies

>>12513115
>facts dont care about ur fallacies
this is a red herring, because you are changing the subject to facts in general. and again, circular reasoning, because you assume your statement is factual without proving it. this only works if you show the studies

boys and girls stink together

>>12513056
how to get griklfreind?

>>12513130
follow ur nose