Thread 12534688

i don't see a problem with people liking children or animals?

>>12534688 (OP)
s4score

that's because it's fine to ^_^

>>12534688 (OP)
Most children and animals are too dumb to protect themselves from the predation of humans.

>>12534696
in the rest of nature that is literally what typifies suitability as prey

>>12534695
Fed, glowie, glow nigger, popo, pigs, facist, ahh reply

>>12534705
Wtf I love feds/glowies/glow niggers/the popo/pigs/fascists now

if a comic book told me to have sex I would immediately do it

>>12534723
Literally all comic books say that. Just implicitly. Heh.

What about children who are animals, or animals who are children?

>>12534688 (OP)
Conceptualize "liking" to the rest of the class, anon

>>12534688 (OP)
it is culturally inappropriate because of Judeo-Christian family values

other absurd cultural norms we have is that it's OK to eat a pig, but not dog or cat, even though a pig is as smart as a dog

it's important to realize that this kind of stuff is actually not based on anything other than "we just do things this way because we do OK???" yet can be emotionally very charged

It's so cute when online autists reframe their entire worldview and moral compass to fit around their desire to have sex with children