Thread 16683983

People are now actively trying to shove polymath Eric Weinstein into the Terrance Howard 1x1 box, and yet, he smashed "Marie Antionette" here in this faceoff. Replace Witten with EW please /sci/. He earned it, and its time to shift our focus away from the stagnated string theory nonsense.

post the lagrangian eric

>>16684013
https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1929021614177345680

>>16684299
>Imposter Quarks
kek

>yet another media screencap e-celeb/celeb drama thread

kill yourself

>>16683983 (OP)
Has Weinstein actually published anything on GU yet? Last I read it was all confined to hugbox on discord. Which, hilariously, he did after a couple of his followers went rouge and started publishing articles critical of both GU and that other paper he and his wife wrote about applying gauge theory to economics.

>>16684371
>went rouge

>>16684371
Found it:
https://medium.com/@carefulest/i-was-a-fan-of-eric-weinstein-now-hes-threatening-me-on-twitter-9e94d2203375
>Tldr: Eric is a little Jew bitch that screams harassment when he's not given total validation.
Timothy Nguyen's blog where's he's dedicated quite a bit of time talking about the failings of GU
https://timothynguyen.org/geometric-unity/
And the paper he wrote that absolutely savaged Eric and his wife's """""revolutionary""""" ideas in economics
https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.03460
>Our conclusion is that the main contribution of the Malaney-Weinstein work is that it provides a striking example of how to obscure simple concepts through an uneconomical use of gauge theory.
I kek every time. Fuck Eric Weinstein.

>>16684394
>Malaney-Weinstein
Why are Jews like this? Not only she kept her maiden name, she’s also in front.

>>16683983 (OP)
So is the guy on the left just there to make everyone assume they're all nonces?

Eric Weinstein sees the magic in nature. He’s hated by hard atheists who refuse to see the wonder and mystery and beauty within nature.

>>16684444
What a massive waste of quads.

Kek I remember when winestain cried about 4chan in 2021 like a bitch. I know you're on here eric.

I'm pretty sure the retarded/useless moderator of sci put witten's image in the sticky after hearing whinestein talk about him

>>16683983 (OP)
/sci/ is just /tv/ but with more gays

>>16684394
>https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.03460
"It might work...but it was too complicated for me."

I knew Nguyen didnt have shit on Weinstein when he uploaded a looong ass rebuttle to GU. Reminded me of someone that makes a 4 hour long review of a 1.5 hour long movie.

>>16684596
>Reminded me of someone that makes a 4 hour long review of a 1.5 hour long movie.
We found the ZPE converter guys, just gotta harness narrative bullshit somehow...

>>16684596
The smug söyness virtually oozes from those Latex docs.

>>16683983 (OP)
This interview was quite the spectacle. But I have the feeling the guy on the left never actually read Eric's paper. He just brought it to have this "entertainer" gotcha reading off the first few sentences on the thing. Which is fair in a way, since it's pretty wacky given. But I can't get rid off the feeling that this was supposed to be a character assassination of Eric.

>>16684631
"the guy", it's okay Eric, we know it's you.

>>16684596
>...the particular attempt of [MW21] in its current state falls far short of what could be called a success.
>The complexity that went into the constructions of [MW21] far exceed the gains of what was produced
Fuck off you disingenuous name nigger faggot.

>>16684631
>character assassination of Eric.
Carroll was actually remarkably polite after listening to Weinstein unloading his paranoid delusions about Big Physics. AND being attacked personally.
It was a character suicide if anything.

>>16684653
>It was a character suicide if anything.
>>16684299
>https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1929021614177345680

Sean Carrol has lost all credibility and is in the same catagory as Professor Dave now. A charlatan autist regurgitating conjectures or measurements made by others. A professional *fan* of science, Not A Scientist.

>>16684631
Its not a feeling. See >>16684299

Sean Caroll claims he's read the paper, but then every point he tries to make about the paper he "read" is already in the paper. So he's outright lying. And thats exactly the point Eric was making in the interview to begin with. Normal folks dont understand the nuances of it because they wont know what anyone is talking about other than one pretending to talk down on another.

>>16684676
Post the lagrangian

>>16684653
Agreed, was refreshing to listen to Carroll. He was always on point and I understood what he was saying. Stark contrast to Eric. Nevertheless, I think >>16684676 has a point. Apparently, what Carroll was asking for was in paper. So that makes me think, he's never even looked in it past the wacky "work of entertainment" bit and this was an very well-done ambush on Eric.

>>16684641
If I was Eric, I would be a tripfag.

>>16684653
You got hoodwinked by Caroll and his "polite" demeanor. Carroll was being an asshole to Weinstein while pretending to be polite to the viewers. Weinstein was responding to kind to the asshole move by Carroll. This flew over your head as Carroll understands the mainsteam audience is dumb as a rock like you

>>16684762
whatever Carroll did or didn't do, nothing quite compares with Weinstein summoning AI to his defense
>W-what if grok or ChatGPT finds my theory is right, huh?!
sorry, I won't be taking a person who said that seriously in any capacity whatsoever

>>16684869
>muh AI bad
Your brain got rotten by culture war issues

>>16684873
you don't even understand the point. Good chance you could actually be Eric

>>16684874
You dont understand what you're asking. You're asking others to buy into your culture war issue about AI and claim its some how "WEIRD." First you got conned by Caroll and his sweet talks, and now you're showing that you got brainfucked by culture war issues. That tells me you're really susceptible to manipulation as you're lacking critical thinking.

>>16684883
I'm not asking anything. Bringing up an LLM as an attempetd defense of your breakthrough theory has nothing to do with culture war. At this point, just slit your wrists Eric.

>>16684958
>LLM bad!!! ITS NOT CULTURE WAR!!!

>>16684460
You're a massive waste.

>>16683983 (OP)
hey anons who dont work in theoretical physics, Pro tip:

if theyre on television/youtube and you've heard of them, they arent doing anything meaningful or substantial to advance human knowledge

>>16684883
basado.

>>16684966
>LLM bad
not what I said, illiterate ape
>ITS NOT CULTURE WAR
it's not, except for you apparently

New weinstein cope just dropped:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILlhFKuu3NQ

>muh Lagrangian
is this the new DISC cope to exclude alternative theories?

>>16685324
>DISC
nobody likes your clumsy coinages, Eric

>>16684299
>Lagrangians (plural)
>there are multiple considerations involved in blah blah blah
lmao

>>16685324
No, he doesn't even necessarily need a Lagrangian, just some sort of equation or computational rule that forms the basis for everything the theory predicts. The reason he's being shat on this way specifically is because someone asked him what the Lagrangian for his theory was and his response was to get offended rather than answering the question.

>>16685627
>just some sort of equation or computational rule that forms the basis for everything the theory predicts
So a Lagrangian.

Eric is a national embarrassment.

>>16683983 (OP)
So happy I have never heard of any of these people

>>16684883
Yeah but what if Grok and ChatGPT find that the theory isn't right?

>>16685728
How so?

>>16685802
He is an embarrassment for the entire nation.

>>16684665
>regurgitating conjectures or measurements made by others
So a science educator. Really not the own you think it is.

>>16685809
>So a science educator.
Political activist, see;
>>16684299
>https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1929021614177345680
>Really not the own you think it is.
I dont think it is, I know it is.

Youre not a scientist...why are you LARPing on the internet? Do research, not blurt out your egoism.

>>16683983 (OP)
>"Marie Antionette"
burger L

>>16684376
kek

>>16686034
>burger L
[So out of touch with a growing revolution that he says "Let them eat Nonofthat."]
Europeans are utterly ignorant about politics, European history, and cultures other than their 50 year old neo-Reich called the EU.
>The European Union is a geo-political entity, created in 1993
HOLY SHIT...Im older than the EU! Ha, fucking kids and their hand-me-down plot of land.

>>16685756
Guy in the middle is a massive shiteater who can singlehandedly make anybody hate britbongs after listening to him for 10 minutes, don't know the others.

>>16686181
>reddit communist reacts

>>16686181
cant remember who it was but there was a reaction video to caroll/weinstein video, and it touched on curts glazing of weinstein and he said something like "i was on the fence with curt but now i know hes trash" and then flashed a shit emoji, i dont think anyone in the comments noticed what that dude just did to that poojeet curt

>>16686700
it was professor h.c. Dave's reaction video to the Whinestein / Carroll Video

>>16684394
>what's timmy gon d-
>NOOO TIMOTHY NOO NOT THAT

>>16684665
Professor Dave
>not a professor
>doesnt even have a master degree, much less a phd
what a dishonest charlatan

>>16684883
are you genuinely dumb? asking an LLM about an unsettled physics question is as good as asking a toddler, it literally has no way of answering such questions correctly. you probably don't know what an LLM is to begin with tho

>>16684299
Yea, Carroll comes across as a propagandist hack. Repeating a lie so it sticks into the minds of normies who would never even glance at a physics paper.

>>16686181
GOOOOD FUCK OFF """"PROFESSOR"" DACE HOLY SHIT DEGREE AND PROFESSION COPE

>>16685807
You’re an embarrassment to your mother

>>16684966
>LLM bad
Yes.

A bit off-topic but anons might fine this amusing. Pierre-Marie Robitaille, an actual pHD, responds to Professor Dave and, well….see for yourself:
https://youtu.be/JRrTvP95kf4?si=gWZk_qNaIzndMK6x

>>16690784
>uploaded 4 years ago
Credentials and citations arent very effective.

https://youtu.be/k2zzwOTVl9Q

>>16690827
>Credentials and citations arent very effective.
Found the reason why. G-d. ; )

https://youtu.be/LF-IJ_hY_x0

can i get a QRD on his theory? I dont care about the lagrangian, what does it predict/unify/describe and does it contradict current observations of something real?

>>16690852
>can i get a QRD on his theory
No. Listen to Dave Farina make a racket at the mall instead.

https://youtu.be/wKxy-3zSpLE

Unbelted Autists are a consequence to everyone.

>>16690857
Vs Eric "40 years an academic slave" Weinstein.

https://youtu.be/EYEGas6BdbE

Lagrangian is OUR word now, professhonky.

>>16690692
I had sex with your mom and she told me the opposite. Cope.

>>16690852
it predicts that the spacetime swervature undulates the pseudoquantized Einsteinian displasion, giving rise to the transductive quantum-foam bundle which does away with Dirac spin statistics and replaces it with quasi-determinate Heisenbergian spiralinors, basically debunking all decoherence considerations. Pretty neat.

>>16684665
I hate 'professor' dave, he's the biggest fag on youtube

Geometric Unity works and makes some predictions, but those predictions are not experimentally verifiable. What is much more interesting is how this framework allows you to describe the quantum world with a classical paradigm without relying on unfalsifiable anzats (unlike pilot wave).

>>16691663
>not experimentally verifiable
Thus unscientific.

>>16691732
>Thus unscientific.
Its ok if a theory makes some predictions that cant be checked, what matters is what can be checked.
Does it contradict any current observations?
Does it make at least a single new prediction that can be verified?

>>16691732
Its faith then.
>I'll go with science.
2 weeks to flatten the curve in our simulation theory many worlds reality? Its both faith, you just never knew it.

Youre fucked and stuck, hueman...

>>16691761
>2 weeks to flatten the curve in our simulation theory many worlds reality?
Whether we live in basic reality or a simulation, I don't know, so I don't have to trust anything here. If it is a simulation, cheat-codes must be present, though.
> Its both faith, you just never knew it.
One thing is to trust some basic stuff like one straight line through two dots (which you can prove, actually, by simple math such as ax+b=y)
The other thing is to believe a kike and his inconsistent babble. I'd rather trust my gut feeling that he's not just a quack but an actor discriminating independent scientists to prevent academia from losing its monopoly on knowledge (who needs them when ai is already a better specialist than all their professors)

>>16692117
>who needs them when ai is already a better specialist than all their professors
Can't wait for this day to happen desu. They've been gloating so much about blue collar workers' job being offshored and now it's their turn.

>>16691428
9/10, should have snuck in the term "observerse" somewhere

>>16692117
>so I don't have to trust anything here
You trust the water in the bottle at the store is water and not acid, that the Doctors actually read the papers to the drugs they prescribe, that the Physicist actually read the papers they tell the layman to disregard (Seal "Nonofthat" Carrol.)
>straight line through two dots
No in spherical Geometry. Do you live on a 2-D plane?
>I'd rather trust my gut
Faith.
>an actor discriminating independent scientists
Sean? Yeah, educated enough to "speak the language" but not enough to "move the field". There needs to be a seperate catagory for "Doctor with a Master's understanding" and "Doctor that advances the field" (taking minute measurments as part of a group of 50 that publishes a paper that changes almost nothing isnt "advancing" the field, its lab work for the lead authors.)

That used to be Master's degree...now we have two different kinds of Doctors and they use one to combat the other. Either dont pass crackpots or strip Doctors of their cash-for-title.

>>16692137
>You trust the water in the bottle at the store is water and not acid
That is a testable belief.
> that the Doctors actually read the papers to the drugs they prescribe
Probably not.
> that the Physicist actually read the papers they tell the layman to disregard (Seal "Nonofthat" Carrol.)
Jewish contribution to science is net negative, Eric. Thank you for being an illustration to it. Or you can start a thread in which you step by step explain to laymen how you came to the breakthrough conclusions of yours. But you won't, and we both know why.
> Faith.
Of course I have faith. Faith in myself and not in some filthy kike, I'm sorry for that, but this disdain is well deserved.
Maybe I would trust you more, if you didn't try to obfuscate your nothing-burger by overcomplicating it with the way you speak about it without making sure that readers understood. Making sure they do not. Basically, that is a way to spot a charlatan.

>>16684676
where is the fucking paper tho?
I want to read it

>>16684299
Was these parts there before the interview?
What prevented Eric from showing where they were instead of replying with his usual word salad?

>>16693224
>cant into google
>will attempt to review abstract Theoretical Physics paper
Why are you here?

>>16693230
google points me to weinstein's page
there I am supposed to subscribe to a fucking newsletter
the button throws an error when pushed
so, where is the fucking paper

>>16693235
>literally the first result in my search
Zoomer or Alpha?

>>16693229
HEY.....I'll have "Nonofthat." in this thread.

>>16693238
Provide me with a link to web.archive so we know you didn't change it. After all, it's a WORKING draft.
>>16693237
My search results are:
your site, where it cannot be downloaded, only requested, so it's conveniently not on web.archive.org
reddit, where it is deleted for whatever reason
scribd, in which you can "Replace existing version of the document" at any time.
Maybe you posted it here, so I can find it on warosu or on the other one

>>16693250
>Provide me with a link
No. Get a job, wagie.
>My search results are
I dont care about your failure.
>your site
You are Schizophrenic.

Why are you on /sci/?

>>16693254
So you changed your draft (probably with some help from ai) and now pretend it was always there? Got it.
> Get a job,
> wagie.
and this kike calls somebody else schizophrenic, duh

>>16693256
>you
>your
Schizophrenic.

>>16693259
> more kvetching
typical

>>16693261
Submit a ticket and get back to work.

>>16693266
So, the question remains: if that chapter (so explicitly named, is it normal?) was there at the moment of the interview, didn't the-other-weinstein know it was there? Why didn't he just say so?
Either way, we need a follow-up debate, since both sides think they're in the right (naturally, the opponents right is your left, and love is not looking at each other, but looking in the same direction)

>>16693270
>we need a follow-up debate
I dont. Sean declared defeat without capitulating openly. I dont read LaTex so Eric's paper is not decypherable to me, but now Ive seen enough (plus Erics recent lectures) to have much more interest in where it goes. His detractors are beung revealed as outright lying charlatans. Why are you running cover for Corona pushing Academia?

Why are you on /sci/?

>>16693275
>I dont.
Naturally, because you'll just get your ass back to you on a tray even more mercilessly (and a photo of someone else won't change the fact that you're a namefag rooting for somebody and posts photos of other people as if a namefag would root for somebody but himself.

>>16693277
>namefag rooting for somebody
I root for the Truth and scientific discovery...something you know nothing about.
>as if a namefag would root for somebody but himself
You root for nothing but degeneration itself, tearing down anything with potential and replacing it with nothing but shitposts.

This is what you produce...a civilization of trash and feces.

Why are you on /sci/? Go back >>>/pol/.

>>16693278
> Cult of Passion
In the context of this Weinstein being a distraction from the other Weinstein, who is a distraction from Epstein, makes perfect sense.

>>16693280
Schizo-Phrenic.

t.Doctor of Developmental Psychology

I could cure it...but youre too arrogant and ignorant to listen to anything but your own ego-penis. I dont care about your delusions...youre lost in them and think its insightful to sooth-seer, as if thats new or mysterious...
[eye roll]
Garden variety delusional paranoid schizophrenic...a by-product of idolological and deep state psy-op's.

>>16693289
>t.Doctor of Developmental Psychology
So, not even a physicist. Just a member of the the cult of pederasts.

>>16693297
>not even a physicist
That was my first thesis, Dimensional SpaceTime Theory, and is heavy on Lagrangian and Hilbert Spaces, very Geometric, but reductionist in Dimensions unlike other's theories. Stop talking to people like you know them, you do nothing but reveal your DELUSIONAL Schizophrenia.
>cult of pederasts
>Epstein
>kvetching
PARANOID.

Youre flat and cheap..."garden variety" and easy to diagnose. Fueled by media and /pol/, nothing more...a by-product of the CIA.

>>16693280
Weinstein LARPing as Einstein to distract from the other Weinstein who is a distraction from Epstein.

>>16693357
14d yahtzee

>>16683983 (OP)
>polymath
strange way to say "fat, retarded Jew"

Give me a single prediction of this theory, i dont care if it cant be verified.
Say, does it predict particle scattering caused by gravity, in a quantun context?
Again, dont care if it cant be checked. I love science fiction

why is brian keating glazing weinstein so hard, who else has jumped on the bandwagon?

lol

lmao even

>>16693315
Hello, thank you for your posts. If you have some time right now please set aside a few seconds to take the following into consideration:

>You are retarded.

Thank you for your attention.

>>16684371
The one paper he published literally says its for entertainment purposes only.

>>16686700
I was very impressed by Curt in that interview. He clearly put in a lot of time understanding the theory. To the point he may understand it better than Weinstein.