← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16685766

23 posts 6 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16685766 >>16685770 >>16689851 >>16689880 >>16693543 >>16698236
Why is China losing the AI race when they should be dominating it? Aren’t they closer to robots than white people?
Anonymous No.16685769
all relevant knowledge is written in english and chinks are too stupid for english, simple as
Anonymous No.16685770 >>16693531
>>16685766 (OP)
I thought China had room temperature super conductors and working fusion power generation. They should have Star Trek level tech by now at the very least.
Anonymous No.16686435 >>16698004
You know things are bad when trolling is all that is left for you.
Anonymous No.16687505
Robots?
Anonymous No.16687749
AI has always been overhyped to begin with. There is not much of a race going on
Anonymous No.16687783 >>16698005
This is the wrong approach. The main risk with "artificial intelligence" brand chatbots is what I like to call Jackass: Quack Edition. In short, people don't see a doctor, they rely on internet websites and a chatbot interaction to come up with not only diagnosis but also treatment. Problem with this is that a computer can't take the Hippocratic Oath. A computer has no morality. A computer doesn't care if you hurt yourself because you followed the directions a computer generated as text. This is related to the ELIZA effect. [1] The nature of the relation is that we've known for decades that people hallucinate the existence of a "person" or "intelligence" when interacting with a chatbot. This effect was first noticed with the ELIZA chatbot, simulating interaction with a Rogerian therapist. Instead of treating chatbot interaction as a psychological experiment, OpenAI and other chatbot operators treat their work as part circus, part wizard from The Wizard of Oz. [2]
TL;DR There is no "race" per se, only the risk that people will hurt themselves following "advice" that is really just the text generated by a mindless, thoughtless, amoral computer program that doesn't care about you BECAUSE COMPUTER PROGRAMS DON'T CARE ABOUT PEOPLE
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA_effect
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_of_Oz_experiment
Anonymous No.16689851
>>16685766 (OP)
lol
Anonymous No.16689880 >>16697991
>>16685766 (OP)
Something something US sucking up all the talent something more resources than China something more stuff I'm not familiar with something
Anonymous No.16690153
This morning on the news there was a report about using AI to turn pictures of teen girls into child porn.
China is known to be absolutely obsessed with morality, to the point where they judge the moral character of an artist, poet, painter, singer on the basis of the content of their artistic work.
I think this is part of the reason why Chinese are known for being obsessed with saving face.
Now it looks like China is fooling the West into creating a whole new way to transgress morality. The West has been known for sin with rock 'n' roll and drugs and adultery. AI isn't the future, it's just a new way to sin.
Of course there is some good in AI, but right now it's looking like a perverted three ring circus, and Sam Altman—a homosexual jew—is the ringleader.
Any comment that there is some "AI race" to be won has to consider the reality: the good of AI is that it might help doctors a little bit with diagnosis and treatment, it might have some subtle positive or transformative effect on education, as educators adapt to students who use AI to cheat. The good of AI is highly technical, incremental improvements, real six sigma stuff. We're talking about a whole bunch of little improvements across a diverse range of activities. Skynet ain't here, and it ain't coming, neither.
Anonymous No.16691055
At this point supremacy can shift in mere years
Anonymous No.16692715
Bump fu
Anonymous No.16693531
>>16685770
It was actually Japan that had the superconductor, and it was fake as always
Anonymous No.16693543 >>16693550 >>16693566
>>16685766 (OP)
we can replace china with AI
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cUR4up6EBLA
Anonymous No.16693550
>>16693543
More like the other way around. You need drones to actually perform labor, the decision making that is done by overpaid western executives is what is gonna be replaced
Anonymous No.16693566
>>16693543
Isn't it the services economy, which now dominates in the US, which is much more likely to be replaced by AI?
Anonymous No.16694740 >>16696250
Swit and sowah
Anonymous No.16696250
>>16694740
Yes.
Anonymous No.16697706
AI is going to be such a huge issue
Anonymous No.16697991
>>16689880
China has all the talent in the world.
They DOMINATE in all the STEM competitions.
They supply more Engineer grads than any country in the world by a wide margin.

Yet despite all of that, America has the best AI.
Anonymous No.16698004
>>16686435
kinda going to have to say: this
Anonymous No.16698005
>>16687783
>people don't see a doctor, they rely on internet websites
people only avoid seeing a doctor because of financial concerns.
in countries with a proper healthcare system this is not an issue
Anonymous No.16698236
>>16685766 (OP)
chinese history is all about having all the necessary elements to kick off something big and then for whatever reason never being able to catalyze it