What is the scientific explanation for this?

>>16693610 (OP)
Seperate by sex and the answer will be clear.

>>16693610 (OP)
propaganda, only 0.01% is intersex.

>>16693610 (OP)
>ameritards have been so deeply skullfucked by the Culture War psyop that they think, in aggregate, that 1 in every 5 adults is trans, 1 in every 4 is muslim, and 3 in every 10 are foreign-born immigrants
The scientific explanation is that right-wing propaganda is really effective on retards.

>>16693622
They've spent billions on studying and testing how to manipulate people, and they will get their money's worth one way or another.

>>16693633
slight correction, they will get YOUR money's worth.
Never forget that the right-wing media apparatus, especially online, is directly funded by Oil and Pharma billionaires, who in turn amass their wealth through government subsidies.

>>16693638
Lol aren't like 99% of billionaires anti right wing and donate billions of dollars to anti right candidates, NGOs, etc.? You will now make the vacuous arguments that 1) every anti right politician is really also right wing 2) left wing means something so special and politically incorruptible that it can never exist in any sort of real power structure.

>>16693610 (OP)
i'd like to see this controlled for demographics of respondents.

>>16693610 (OP)
These data are suspicious at best, and lies at worse. Let's start from the top.
><0.5% of households in USA have an income over $1 million
This question is misleading since it is reporting those who have salaried position in the millions. Of course this is negligibly low. Most respondents interpret this as number of millionaires in the USA (that's 22 million). The number of households in the USA is about 128 million. This indicates the true proportion is 17%, in line with what the respondents answered as about 20%.

Let's go to number 2 with "are transgender". Yes, the question is asked to estimate USA adults, and that value is 1% at most (likely much lower). But that isn't how people encapsulate the information about transgender. To them, this is the entire faggot community. And restricting your attention to adults obfuscates the reality of the problem: it's the youth who are being targeted by this mass social contagion.
https://thehill.com/homenews/education/3975959-one-in-four-high-school-students-identify-as-lgbtq/
Indeed, it's bad enough to 1 in 4 (25%) high schoolers are identifying as some kind of tranny faggot. The estimated proportion is 21%, which is in line with the true proportion of 25%.

I think I've proved my point here. No need to deboonk the rest. YouGov should know better.

Consider a simplified model: Half the respondents know the true answer and half pick a number at random. You'd get approximately the results in the chart. Why would you expect anything else?

>>16693653
>aren’t like 99% of billionaires anti right wing

>>16693653
>aren't like 99% of billionaires anti right wing
No. Are you retarded? All billionaires' wealth is given to them by the government through right-wing policy.
In America, they do fund both of the right-wing parties, but that's to ensure that their interests are protected no matter who's in power. And their "donations" to NGOs and charities are money laundering and tax avoidance.

>>16693653
>1) every anti right politician is really also right wing
>2) left wing means something so special and politically incorruptible that it can never exist in any sort of real power structure.
setting aside that you're too /pol/brained for this board, #1 is more-or-less true. you can't attain elected office in any Western nation if you don't bend the knee to Capital, whatever your actual beliefs are. This is why the best anyone can do is welfare-state liberalism; that's the furthest concession that the Ruling Class will allow.
#2 is something nobody ever says though. That's a strawman argument peddled by degenerate retards in suits that make 6 figures a year by shilling on Twitter and FOX

>>16693673
Thank you, I always get a kick out of predicting the flow of left-right theater.

>the currentest year that ever yeared
>still posturing as Le Heckin Enlightened Centristerino
>>>/r/eddit

>>16693675
>too /pol/brained
>goes on rant about capital C Capital and throws in FOX for good measure
Lol like pottery. If only turbulence were this deterministic.

>>16693680
empirical facts tend to be predictable, dumbfuck.
if you're too susceptible to ideological capture to see the structures that undergird the world around you, this is not the board for you.

>>16693681
>susceptible to ideological capture
I predicted what you'd say, told you you'd say it, and you said it anyway. You're so captured by the words left and right that you can't even help yourself lol.

>@16693686 (You)

>>16693689
>>16693689

(You)mad

>>16693694
>>16693694

>>16693686
>so captured by the words left and right
>>16693679

>>16693610 (OP)
What kind of retard would guess that 30% of the population lives in New York City?

>>16693700
>>16693694

>>16693702
drunks and pillfiends that live in flyover states. the same people that fell for the Q meme.

>>16693610 (OP)
Misrepresentation in the media in order to get the working class to fight each other instead of the rich.

>>16693750
uhm ackshually that's heckin right-left theaterino

>>16693622
>le right-wing propaganda did it
Man...are you serious?

>>16693782
Notice how this doesn't say left or right lol, it just says a true statement.

>>16693791
I'm well aware, but according to Anon above in this thread, that makes you a Heckin Sheeple or whatever redditor shit.

>>16693794
This anon? >>16693679

>>16693622
>right-wing propaganda
Delulu

>>16693610 (OP)
You mean 1/5 Americans aren't transgender muslim millionaires? I've been lied to...

>>16693653
>>16693638
Billionaires are leftwing when they want to import cheep foreign labor and right winged when they want to not pay taxes.

The true answer is national socialism.

>>16695397
>Billionaires are leftwing when they want to import cheep foreign labor and right winged when they want to not pay taxes.
then the very idea of left or right wing is fucking meaningless

>>16695397
>Billionaires are leftwing when they want to import cheep foreign labor
ah yes, the leftist goal of cutting labor costs as much as possible to increase profit margins. one of Marx et al.'s greatest contributions to political thought.
>this is your brain on /pol/

>>16695397
>import cheep foreign labor
This has always been classified as "right," not "left." Even Crazy Bernie used to talk shit about open borders until the DNC bribed his broke ass with a beach house timeshare or whatever it was.

>>16693610 (OP)
innumeracy. people don't think in numbers, they think in gut feelings and then associate numbers with them.
"20%" when they say it doesn't mean "1 in every 5 people", it means "a small portion".
>>16693613
if you separate by sex men will come off better not because most men are any better than most women, but because of the minuscule fraction of the population that actually thinks in numbers, somewhat more are men than women.

>>16695462
Jesus fucking christ lol when will you nerds ever take Marx's balls out of your mouth. He is not some sort of eternal definition or paragon of left. Whiny ass bougie man child with long syphillis from 150 years ago, you could find a more perceptive manifesto on the hard drive of any random 15 year old emo teen

>>16695488
>see the name Marx
>chimp out
that's why I said "et al." you illiterate dipfuck. there's been almost 200 years of further work since the publishing of the Manifesto.

>>16695492
for fuck's sake, forgot to clear out my Name >>16695469

>>16695492
>chimp out
>illiterate dipfuck
Lol what why are you mad, Ricardo, lmao
>further work
Any "work" that ties itself to Marx is like spilling a rancid 200 year old bottle of whale oil on a piece of paper and lighting it on fire.