EW is great because even /sci/ cannot deny he is pulling out these brilliant nuggets for everyone maybe to understand. Now to my question, can AI adequately asplain deSitter space to me, and like concepts, and if yes, which is the best AI to use and prompt to use, if you would be so kind /sci/. I would like to know the mind of God, and I feel AI can help.

>EW is great
No.
>brilliant nuggets
No.
>everyone maybe to understand
You don't understand anything.
>can AI adequately asplain deSitter space to me
No.
>and like concepts
You can't understand string theory with "concepts". You need to understand the mathematics.

>>16696501
ok.

>>16696501
>>EW is great
>No.
>>brilliant nuggets
>No.
>>everyone maybe to understand
>You don't understand anything.

Can you iceberg Weinstein's theory? He can yours bro.

>>16696517
I don't know what that means.

>>16696490 (OP)
I like his brother.

>>16696518
forget it, rate your level of understanding of string theory and deSitter space please. High, Medium, or Low would suffice.

>>16696531
Low. I never studied string theory although I have a physics background. "Understanding" de Sitter space itself is not that difficult as it's simple to define if you have a mathematical background. Weinstein is a retarded faggot though. The only people who think his "theory" offers anything new are larping physics fans who he fools into thinking a bunch of wordies amounts to a theory of physics.

>>16696537
at least you're honest. btw, his understanding is "high".

>>16696538
And yours?

>>16696539
I need AI to help me understand the math. What AI can help those of us whom are low on the intellectual totem compared to fissics phDs?

>>16696544
Ahahahahahaaha. You won't understand anything. You should study some basic physics and calculus. Then you might actually learn something. Weinstein is a fraud, and AI is bullshit.

>>16696550
fuck off, I know calculus and differential equations. I could even Lagrangian mechanics like you would not believe.

>>16696567
Well that's good. Don't waste your time on Weinstein's shit and talking to AIs.

>>16696577
you sound like a student of Lenny.

Let's start all over again. Real string theory hasn't been done yet. 40 years down the tubes. bwuhuhahahaha

Weinstein is shining light and treading where angels fear to tread.

>>16696600
>Lenny
What, Susskind? I'm sure Weinstein hates him since Susskind is a real string theorist. However I'm not a string theorist, and I don't know much about it. In fact I think it's a waste of time in 2025, but I could be wrong.

>>16696659
Weinstein hates everybody who's a real physicist

>>16696689
>Weinstein hates everybody who's a real physicist
did you deboonk him?

Explain this theory of everything as if you’re telling a brain damaged mechanic?

>>16696772
>brain damaged mechanic
how did you know?

>>16696490 (OP)
I'm just happy Eric exists in this world and is doing his best. Not so much Re: Brett.

>>16696840
Is this how you're giving yourself words of affirmation?

Those two brothers are extremely retarded. It actually amazes me how delusional they are. They should be studied like another species.

>>16696490 (OP)
>proven correct by DATA?
do normies not know about numerical methods kek

>>16696777
No jokes, Joker.