← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16700950

1000 posts 478 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16700950 [Report] >>16700963 >>16700970 >>16700974 >>16701050 >>16701059 >>16701213 >>16701302 >>16701741 >>16702179 >>16702598 >>16702612
/sfg/ - Spaceflight General
ProjectCyclops - edition

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730010095

previous >>16698414
Anonymous No.16700959 [Report] >>16701021
How about Project Guyclops, and its just for the fellas?
Anonymous No.16700962 [Report]
Anonymous No.16700963 [Report]
>>16700950 (OP)
two weeks, but it's not going to launch on a sunday.
Anonymous No.16700965 [Report] >>16700966 >>16701055 >>16701066 >>16701121 >>16701181
why build space stations when we can build space mattresses?
Anonymous No.16700966 [Report] >>16700968 >>16702054
>>16700965
What happens when the trees grow a bit more?
Anonymous No.16700968 [Report] >>16700973
>>16700966
you send space mexicans to trim them
Anonymous No.16700970 [Report] >>16700972
>>16700950 (OP)
Anonymous No.16700971 [Report] >>16700975 >>16702058
If you have a VR headset, just a heads up.

https://x.com/vast/status/1935336542219944118

>Haven-1 VR is officially available for download from Meta, the App Store, and Steam
Anonymous No.16700972 [Report]
>>16700970
i hate 3d printer fags so much
Anonymous No.16700973 [Report] >>16700981
>>16700968
we need a siesta in the mars constitution
Anonymous No.16700974 [Report] >>16700978 >>16700979 >>16700980
>>16700950 (OP)
They already started to film the Moon landing because Felon Musk's Starshit can't reach orbit.
Anonymous No.16700975 [Report]
>>16700971
guess i'll try it out later today
Anonymous No.16700978 [Report] >>16701033 >>16701042
>>16700974
just don't pull a Apollo 12 and zap the camera into the sun fellas
Anonymous No.16700979 [Report]
>>16700974
lol what’s up with the cope lander design? They already know they’re doing the mission on starship.
Anonymous No.16700980 [Report] >>16700982
>>16700974
why dont they do the smart thing and bring some lights with them?
Anonymous No.16700981 [Report]
>>16700973
Mars days are a half hour longer so they can have it in that period
Anonymous No.16700982 [Report] >>16700983
>>16700980
You wouldn't notice them unless they approach solar brightness
Anonymous No.16700983 [Report] >>16700988
>>16700982
>solar brightness
what
Anonymous No.16700988 [Report]
>>16700983
Same reason you cant see stars on the moon unless its night or you step into shadow and dont have sunlit terrain in your field of vision
Anonymous No.16700991 [Report] >>16700996 >>16700998 >>16701022
Remember Musk’s melty?
Anonymous No.16700996 [Report]
>>16700991
it's actually a musk grilled cheese
a melt is a different thing
Anonymous No.16700998 [Report] >>16700999
>>16700991
which one?
Anonymous No.16700999 [Report] >>16701000
>>16700998
the one where he screamed at the spacex employees and went berserk after CRS-7
Anonymous No.16701000 [Report]
>>16700999
actually don't know that one
Anonymous No.16701020 [Report] >>16701043
Ha ha, fuck that retard that made the earlier new thread!
Anonymous No.16701021 [Report]
>>16700959
hahahaha hell yeah dude
Anonymous No.16701022 [Report] >>16701029
>>16700991
He's bringing us the Starfleet Academy so I don't care about anything else.
Anonymous No.16701029 [Report] >>16701036
>>16701022
>cool idea
>I'm autistically fixated on a superficial element though
Yes Elon, we could've guessed
Anonymous No.16701033 [Report]
>>16700978
Anonymous No.16701036 [Report] >>16701038
>>16701029
It was easy bait for him to take given that the proposal placed it in the same place as Starfleet's academy in Star Trek. Main thing to keep in mind is that this isn't an actual Pentagon plan, it's something a couple of retired officers came up with.
The location is bad for many physical security reasons. They picked it because, beyond the Star Trek stuff, they think they'd be able to tap into the tech talent of the Bay Area. Being integrated into the culture of that area is the last thing the military is going to want for a service academy.
Anonymous No.16701038 [Report] >>16701040
>>16701036
Sigh...
>Michael LaValle and DeVan Shannon, both former Army officers, suggest the establishment of a comprehensive military academy akin to West Point, aimed at equipping future officers for the swiftly changing dynamics of contemporary warfare. Their vision, known as the “Frontier Academy,” is set to be located near Silicon Valley at the Presidio in San Francisco. This site historically functioned as an Army post and, interestingly, served as the fictional home of Starfleet Academy in Star Trek.
>LaValle and Shannon contend that the existing U.S. military academies are sluggish in their adaptation and fail to incorporate innovations from the private sector completely. They propose that an academy close to tech giants such as SpaceX and Google would enable students to participate in military reserves while engaging in the private sector, thereby establishing an essential connection between military and civilian technological progress.
>The proposal emphasizes insights from Ukraine and Israel, showcasing how young leaders in cyber and robotics assume significant military responsibilities at younger ages. In contrast, the U.S. does not have a clear framework for cultivating young, tech-savvy military leaders.
>Although the Air Force, Navy, and Army academies have incorporated cyber and space programs, LaValle and Shannon argue that establishing a dedicated academy is essential to leverage technological innovation for the future of warfare fully.
ChatTDG !!Z0MA/4gprbd No.16701040 [Report]
>>16701038

>giving future officers a California mindset

Jeez ... rather stick with the snake handling hicks.
Anonymous No.16701042 [Report]
>>16700978
Not Al Beans best moment
Anonymous No.16701043 [Report]
>>16701020
preferred his pic though
Anonymous No.16701050 [Report]
>>16700950 (OP)

> $10 billion in Gold Backed Federal Notes at early 70s valuation, for a single purpose facility searching out only to 1000 ly for something virtually certain not to exist that close.

You think you hate NASA enough, but you really don't.
Anonymous No.16701051 [Report]
NB: That's $80 to $90 billion in Trump Bucks.
Anonymous No.16701055 [Report] >>16701062
>>16700965
Because His Holiness is on board with the excavation plan
Anonymous No.16701059 [Report] >>16701064
>>16700950 (OP)
>jason calencanis
If Elon cares about the Epstein list so much, why is he hanging out with a guy near the top?
Anonymous No.16701062 [Report]
>>16701055
Catholic lava tube fiefdoms? COUNT me in (no pun intended heheh)
Anonymous No.16701063 [Report] >>16701065
Government-run space program anon reporting in.
Anonymous No.16701064 [Report]
>>16701059
Pedo is just his go-to insult for anyone who doesn't do what he demands. It doesn't literally mean he thinks the person he's trying to insult has sex with children. It does however beg the question of why that's his go-to insult of choice.
Anonymous No.16701065 [Report] >>16701102
>>16701063
Where the fuck does the potential energy for a lightning strike even come from?
Anonymous No.16701066 [Report] >>16701071
>>16700965
Interesting concept but how resilient would it be to post failures? How many could it lose in an area before collapse?
Anonymous No.16701069 [Report] >>16701074 >>16701078 >>16701365 >>16701536
Am I going to be explaining Mars mattress to newfags until I'm 90?
Anonymous No.16701071 [Report] >>16701073 >>16701076
>>16701066
you could do like airships and make it out of many mattresses instead of a single mattress. airships used many air bladders instead of a single one so that there wasnt a single point of failure.
Anonymous No.16701073 [Report]
>>16701071
He doesn't even know it's a tensile structure.
Anonymous No.16701074 [Report] >>16701365
>>16701069
you could just write it up and post the link until you're 90 instead.
Anonymous No.16701076 [Report] >>16701083
>>16701071
>single point of failure.
thats the idea itself.
Anonymous No.16701078 [Report] >>16701081 >>16701365
>>16701069
Yes. This is the first time I've ever heard of the concept. If you wish to promote it beyond your bubble (or air mattress), you have to be willing to educate those new to the concept.
Anonymous No.16701081 [Report]
>>16701078
https://caseyhandmer.wordpress.com/2019/11/28/domes-are-very-over-rated/
Anonymous No.16701083 [Report] >>16701088
>>16701076
Yeah if you think pressure vessels being punctured works like the movie Alien
Anonymous No.16701088 [Report] >>16701961
>>16701083
you mean they dont? i was really hoping to see someone sucked out of a quarter sized hole.
Anonymous No.16701090 [Report]
Decompression not being like Hollywood movies doesn't mean habitat leaks aren't an important issue that must be accounted for with something beyond hand waving.
Anonymous No.16701102 [Report] >>16701104
>>16701065
the sun
Anonymous No.16701104 [Report] >>16701114
>>16701102
I don't think that's true at all
Anonymous No.16701114 [Report]
>>16701104
it comes from manitou
Anonymous No.16701120 [Report] >>16701130 >>16701131 >>16701134 >>16702074 >>16702582
why is it called spaceFLIGHT? it's not really flying now is it

more like floating, or hanging about
Anonymous No.16701121 [Report] >>16701137
>>16700965
why not just replace the mass of the gas above your head with a similar mass of fluid
Anonymous No.16701130 [Report] >>16701139
>>16701120
Anonymous No.16701131 [Report]
>>16701120
flüght
Anonymous No.16701134 [Report] >>16701837 >>16702074
>>16701120
Our machines operate inside of atmospheres, thus they're all flying
Anonymous No.16701137 [Report]
>>16701121
Finally a use for aerogel.
Anonymous No.16701139 [Report]
>>16701130
woll smoth
Anonymous No.16701143 [Report] >>16701144 >>16701148 >>16701153 >>16701154 >>16701167 >>16701183 >>16701278 >>16701528 >>16701570 >>16702083
Does /sfg/ support this?
Anonymous No.16701144 [Report]
>>16701143
What "people" is this meant to be a gift from?
Anonymous No.16701147 [Report]
It's some euro artist trying to drum up business for himself. No doubt this is meant to be funded by the government, with the money going to him.
Anonymous No.16701148 [Report] >>16701157
>>16701143
On paper yes but they've only got 3 statues to their name and none of them use titanium. They also wouldn't actually use only titanium and instead would have a steel structure inside with a only a titanium shell.
Also note the complete lack of any real images outside of the three finished statues.
https://www.ateliermissor.com/pages/titanium-statues
https://www.ateliermissor.com/pages/our-monuments
Anonymous No.16701153 [Report] >>16701262
>>16701143
Titanium seems unnecessarily expensive for such a thing.
Anonymous No.16701154 [Report]
>>16701143
Its fucking stupid and nobody would support it.
That would cost a fortune, and get visits from only a handful of local spics who see Prometheus and say, "¿Qué?"
Also the few thousand nerds who travel down there just to take a few selfies, look at the infrastructure for a few minutes, walk on the beach until they have to shit and want to get out of the heat, sun, wind, dust, and biting insects.
Titanium is a stupid choice, why not stainless steel, like this thing in Chicago, its the wet dream of Elon to achieve this level of polish and surface accuracy with Starship. Can you imagine mirrored ships.
Anonymous No.16701155 [Report] >>16701156 >>16701158 >>16701190 >>16701575 >>16702121
An SPMT broke last night
https://x.com/SpaceCosmicCrew/status/1935250265466442025
Anonymous No.16701156 [Report]
>>16701155
I remember when they had the Bucket to sit on. now it's a little cage thingy, neat
Anonymous No.16701157 [Report] >>16701164
>>16701148
So many of the pictures and graphics on this site are just godawful AI.
Clearly from the clips that aren't, those three statues are real and they did actually make them, but the shop as a whole is extremely amateurish. These guys don't know how to run a business or an efficient studio and this project would 100% destroy them before they finished.
Anonymous No.16701158 [Report]
>>16701155
Holy Shit!!
They move ships and boosters on these things ALL THE TIME. Including that very unit that just would have caused a fall and possible fatalities.
Imagine a booster on there, ready to go, falling into the Starfactory on Hwy 4. Or the office building, housing, bystanders.
Anonymous No.16701164 [Report]
>>16701157
I refuse to give business to companies with AI slop product descriptions and whatnot.
Why the hell does chatGPT like the green arrow symbol so much anyways?
Anonymous No.16701167 [Report]
>>16701143
>too lazy to even use a real artist for good concept art
Already over, creatively bankrupt
Anonymous No.16701179 [Report]
spehs
Anonymous No.16701181 [Report]
>>16700965
THIS IS WHAT WILL HAPPEN
Anonymous No.16701183 [Report]
>>16701143
is the gift aislop from this indian account?
Anonymous No.16701190 [Report]
>>16701155
embarrassing
Anonymous No.16701213 [Report] >>16701221 >>16701234
>>16700950 (OP)
Did Elon even invent this or is it just more retarded waste?
Anonymous No.16701221 [Report]
>>16701213
>elon
>inventing something
Anonymous No.16701234 [Report]
>>16701213
Elon invented this in your mother's pussy.
Anonymous No.16701236 [Report] >>16701244
HOLTY HSITT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKwWclAKYa0
Anonymous No.16701237 [Report] >>16701244
ITS OVER
MUSK LOST
MUSK LOST
Anonymous No.16701239 [Report]
how are they gonna test shit at masseys ???????????

im shaking rn
Anonymous No.16701240 [Report]
Holy shit! RIP Ship 36
Anonymous No.16701242 [Report]
2 weeks
Anonymous No.16701243 [Report]
massive setback for the starship program
how are they gonna test ship 37+???
yeah no mars for 2026 nor are we getting a ship catch this year
Anonymous No.16701244 [Report]
>>16701236
>>16701237
2 weeks btw
Anonymous No.16701246 [Report]
That's a big explosion and fire, I wonder how big would it be with full stack explosion.
Anonymous No.16701248 [Report]
aaaaaaaaaaand 2026 is off the table
see you guys in 2028 or whatever
Anonymous No.16701250 [Report]
well, it was good while it lasted
Anonymous No.16701251 [Report] >>16701254 >>16701403 >>16701409 >>16701530 >>16701680 >>16701740 >>16701934 >>16702073 >>16702121
Anonymous No.16701252 [Report]
UH OH STINKY
Anonymous No.16701253 [Report]
that's it, i'm killing myself
Anonymous No.16701254 [Report]
>>16701251
Anonymous No.16701255 [Report] >>16701259
At what point do you just scrap v2
Anonymous No.16701259 [Report]
>>16701255
now lol
Anonymous No.16701260 [Report]
Things are still catching fire and exploding
Anonymous No.16701261 [Report] >>16701267 >>16702109
that didn't look like a normal explosion.
Anonymous No.16701262 [Report] >>16701266
>>16701153
If they really wanted to honor SpaceX, they'd use the same stainless steel as Starship instead of the type of meme material the company typically rejects or at least minimizes.
Anonymous No.16701263 [Report]
Q/A issues with rapid changes in designs
Anonymous No.16701266 [Report]
>>16701262
well titanium is fitting for Prometheus as he was a titan, but that's a lot of extra money just for an obscure nod
Anonymous No.16701267 [Report]
>>16701261
ULA sniper strikes again.
Anonymous No.16701268 [Report] >>16701271 >>16701272
a-any way to sugarcoat this?
Anonymous No.16701270 [Report]
NEVER GOING TO MARS
>CHINA WON
NEVER GOING TO MARS
>CHINA WON
NEVER GOING TO MARS
>CHINA WON
NEVER GOING TO MARS
>CHINA WON
NEVER GOING TO MARS
>CHINA WON
NEVER GOING TO MARS
>CHINA WON
Anonymous No.16701271 [Report]
>>16701268
The fire will eventually RUN OUT OF OXYGEN AND DIE
Anonymous No.16701272 [Report]
>>16701268
>this is why we test on ground
Anonymous No.16701273 [Report] >>16701968 >>16701979
Big yikes. God has been punishing Elon for ket binging Indian shilling ways. Think about it the program was going fantastically until trump showed up at a launch and it’s all downhill from there.
Anonymous No.16701276 [Report]
THANK YOU ELON FOR BOMBING USA AND GIVING US A BETTER SHOW THAN IRAN
Anonymous No.16701278 [Report]
>>16701143
Remember when a crypto project dropped this off at Tesla HQ
Anonymous No.16701281 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701282 [Report]
good morning /sfg/ (volume warning)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aqfu9g9zZUQ
Anonymous No.16701283 [Report]
Imagine being at tiles team.
Anonymous No.16701285 [Report] >>16701356
That's not very typical, I'd like to make that point
Anonymous No.16701287 [Report] >>16701444
The problem is the methane. Very temperamental, you see. Elon should go with a borane-based fuel for v3.
Anonymous No.16701288 [Report] >>16701289
Imagine wanting to put Humans inside that shit
Anonymous No.16701289 [Report]
>>16701288
Did you buy a ticket to get on that ship?
Anonymous No.16701290 [Report] >>16701313
https://x.com/IntelPointAlert/status/1935550776304156932
different video. absolute cinema
Anonymous No.16701291 [Report] >>16701293 >>16701298
Well, that wraps up Starship launches for 2025!
Did we meet or exceed expectations?
Anonymous No.16701292 [Report]
at this point they should just go back to the drawing board and start all over
Anonymous No.16701293 [Report]
>>16701291
did NOT meet expectations, not even close
Anonymous No.16701294 [Report]
Now that the dust has settled, when's the next launch?
Anonymous No.16701295 [Report] >>16701298
Iran has gone too far...
Anonymous No.16701296 [Report]
Just set up a China size solid motor plant and drop the cost of a solid stage to zero. Fuck this liquid nonsense just make solid prop dirt cheap so who cares if u expend it.
Anonymous No.16701297 [Report]
inb4 it was a lithium battery fire from the avionics gear that caused it
Anonymous No.16701298 [Report]
>>16701291
I blame the chief engineer

>>16701295
Israel is blowing up ancient, decrepit, falling-apart museum-pieces like 707s, F14s, and Cobra helis, so a Starship V2 seems like a reasonable addition to that pile
Anonymous No.16701299 [Report] >>16701311
>few hours ago
2 WEEKS!!!
>now
ITS OVER

>a month from now
WE SO BACK
Anonymous No.16701300 [Report]
uh oh, looks like saarshit exploded again.
Anonymous No.16701301 [Report] >>16701304 >>16701319 >>16701554 >>16701680
Anonymous No.16701302 [Report]
>>16700950 (OP)
Q predicted that S36 will explode
>16700840
>16700840
>16700840
Anonymous No.16701304 [Report]
>>16701301
Ignore this, we need to put humans inside of one of these ASAP and send them to Mars, it's happening late 2025 or 2026 trust the plan.
Anonymous No.16701306 [Report]
It's not too late to convert SpaceX into a fantastic fireworks manufacturer.
Anonymous No.16701307 [Report] >>16701314 >>16701315
>16701302
>>16700840
>>16700840
>>16700840
Anonymous No.16701308 [Report]
thunderf00t-sama... I'm sorry...
Anonymous No.16701311 [Report]
>>16701299
Anonymous No.16701313 [Report] >>16701410 >>16701442 >>16701680
>>16701290
Anonymous No.16701314 [Report]
>>16701307
the prophet...
Anonymous No.16701315 [Report] >>16701320 >>16701322
>>16701307
Um.
This was posted like 10 hours ago.
Anonymous No.16701316 [Report] >>16701592
https://x.com/dwisecinema/status/1935552171912655045
Anonymous No.16701317 [Report] >>16701318
Thunderf00t-dono, I kneel and squeel!!!!!! AIIEEEEEEEEEE WE ARE SORRY FOR DOUBTING YOU!!!
Anonymous No.16701318 [Report]
>>16701317
I kneel
Anonymous No.16701319 [Report] >>16701323 >>16701337
>>16701301
That doesn't make any sense. Actual ULA sniper
Anonymous No.16701320 [Report]
>>16701315
i remember seeing that post and i felt my heart jump for a sec
he was right...
Anonymous No.16701321 [Report]
happy Juneteenth /sfg/
Anonymous No.16701322 [Report] >>16701340
>>16701315
We have a saboteur aboard
Anonymous No.16701323 [Report] >>16701325
>>16701319
maybe it was the door
Anonymous No.16701324 [Report]
Man, it's been a while since we've had hardware blow up on the ground
Anonymous No.16701325 [Report]
>>16701323
ELON WILL YOU PLEASE SHUT DA DOOOOOOOOOOOOOR
Anonymous No.16701326 [Report] >>16701328 >>16701331 >>16701334 >>16701336 >>16701339 >>16701605 >>16701607 >>16701988
HOW
ARE
WE
FEELING
/SFG/????
lotta doomer happenings this past few months
Anonymous No.16701327 [Report]
>Another fifty billion dollars down the drain
Anonymous No.16701328 [Report]
>>16701326
from "Anotha day, anotha dolla" to "It really do be like sometimes"
Anonymous No.16701329 [Report]
here you can buy free money
https://polymarket.com/event/spacex-starship-flight-test-10
Anonymous No.16701331 [Report] >>16701332 >>16701333
>>16701326
The explosion was actually a good thing because now they will learn from the mistake and correct it so that the next time it explodes they can learn from that mistake and correct it so the next time it explodes they can learn from that mistake and correct it so the next time it explodes they can learn from that mistake and correct it so the next time it explodes they can learn from that mistake and correct it so the next time it explodes they can learn from that mistake and correct it so the next time it explodes they can learn from that mistake and correct it so the next time it explodes they can learn from that mistake and correct it
Anonymous No.16701332 [Report]
>>16701331
delightfully counterintuitive
Anonymous No.16701333 [Report]
>>16701331
trvthnvke
Anonymous No.16701334 [Report]
>>16701326
Anonymous No.16701335 [Report]
THUNDERF00T, I WRONGED YOU
Anonymous No.16701336 [Report]
>>16701326
Anonymous No.16701337 [Report]
>>16701319
I pray that this was either a deranged Elon hater with a Barrett or a false flag to let Spacex aggressively lobby for some sort of enhanced security zone that will coincidentally also let them turn as much of the wetland into launch pads as they want.
But I know in my heart it was just something retarded.
Anonymous No.16701338 [Report]
this is the same company that has launched 500 gralcon 9s.
maybe it's the south texas water
Anonymous No.16701339 [Report]
>>16701326
I'll go with a "Such is life."
Anonymous No.16701340 [Report]
>>16701322
a fucking spacex cook
Anonymous No.16701341 [Report] >>16701342 >>16701343 >>16701346 >>16701352 >>16701608 >>16701648
Do we have a statement or a probable cause?
Anonymous No.16701342 [Report] >>16701345 >>16701358
>>16701341
No statement, but as for a probable cause...
Anonymous No.16701343 [Report] >>16701358
>>16701341
Could be some kind of explosion
Anonymous No.16701344 [Report] >>16701351 >>16701354 >>16701484
>Starshit v2
How the fuck is a new iteration in design a complete fucking dud? How do you manage to make everything worse in the process of making it better?
Anonymous No.16701345 [Report] >>16701358
>>16701342
Sorry, wrong pic
Anonymous No.16701346 [Report] >>16701357
>>16701341
Small payback from Trump for Musk's Epstein melty.
Courtesy of the CIA.
Anonymous No.16701347 [Report] >>16701348 >>16701353
Didn't the guy in charge of v2 design leave the company before the first company.
Anonymous No.16701348 [Report]
>>16701347
Before the first flight*
Anonymous No.16701349 [Report]
drone view from NSF

https://files.catbox.moe/lmxmyx.mp4
Anonymous No.16701351 [Report]
>>16701344
The thing is, Starship V1 is useless. Starship V2 is an attempt to make V1 useful.
Anonymous No.16701352 [Report]
>>16701341
the elon cheese is melted
Anonymous No.16701353 [Report]
>>16701347
ULA assassins...
Anonymous No.16701354 [Report]
>>16701344
we had the Atari 5200 before the wonderful 7800. sometimes the middle child is retarded
Anonymous No.16701355 [Report] >>16701428
Anonymous No.16701356 [Report] >>16701362 >>16701366 >>16701377
>>16701285
Has SpaceX ever considered designing a rocket that doesn't blow up?
Anonymous No.16701357 [Report]
>>16701346
Most likely cause at this point.
Its sabotage until proven otherwise.
Anonymous No.16701358 [Report]
>>16701342
>>16701343
>>16701345
Har har fucking har
Anonymous No.16701359 [Report]
the sabotage is coming from inside the house
Anonymous No.16701360 [Report]
failure is a rather common option
Anonymous No.16701362 [Report]
>>16701356
Anonymous No.16701363 [Report] >>16701372
>ula sniper
>shoddy work
>trump
>mexican welders getting payback for the ice raids
>leftist sabotage
>iran
take your pick. all valid.
Anonymous No.16701364 [Report] >>16701391
don't worry lads, two more decades until Mars base
Anonymous No.16701365 [Report]
>>16701074
>>16701078
>>16701069
>Mars mattress
The Mars is a revolutionary mattress designed to provide a weightless, tailored sleep experience. Our natural materials, water-based formula....
Anonymous No.16701366 [Report]
>>16701356
Rockets are just repurposed ICBMs. Blowing up is their nature, trying to change that is impossible. Just like a person born as a man will never become a woman.
Anonymous No.16701367 [Report] >>16701370
Starship is musk's spruce goose
Anonymous No.16701368 [Report] >>16701389 >>16701395
IT'S SO FUCKING OVER

WE'RE NEVER GETTING OFF THIS ROCK
Anonymous No.16701370 [Report]
>>16701367
>"get in"
Anonymous No.16701371 [Report] >>16701426
>Anti-materiel rifles typically have an effective range of 1,000 to 2,000 meters (1,100 to 2,200 yards), with some capable of reaching out to 2,500 meters or even further
Anonymous No.16701372 [Report]
>>16701363
Add China fuckery to the list.
Anonymous No.16701377 [Report]
>>16701356
That's heresy Anon.
Anonymous No.16701379 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701381 [Report]
HAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Anonymous No.16701382 [Report] >>16701384 >>16701390 >>16701445 >>16701612 >>16701619
>Be me, a (former) relatively OG Spacex employee
>Have most of my net worth tied up in employee-only Spacex stock that I can only sell twice per year
>Decide last semester to stay invested even though Elon is being a retard because I have faith in the company
>Watch as they repeatedly make unbelievably sophomoric fuckups for the last six months
>Culminating in them blowing up starship on the pad and probably removing the equivalent of a 3 bedroom house from my retirement fund

Words can not describe the hate I feel
Anonymous No.16701383 [Report] >>16701509 >>16701927
Bros... did China just win?
Anonymous No.16701384 [Report] >>16701396
>>16701382
its time for you to go back to the rocket mines to save the company
Anonymous No.16701388 [Report]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBqCDuwZsCs
Anonymous No.16701389 [Report]
>>16701368
You're right, we're never leaving.
Anonymous No.16701390 [Report]
>>16701382
Anonymous No.16701391 [Report]
>>16701364
>don't worry lads, two more centuries until Mars base
ftfy
Anonymous No.16701392 [Report] >>16701397
This gives me great hope. The worse possible thing is Humanity getting off this planet.
Humans are like locusts.
We need another 6 million years of mental evolution before we might be fit enough to become a space faring civilization
Anonymous No.16701393 [Report] >>16701615
Anonymous No.16701395 [Report]
>>16701368
China will. Elon is just the last gasp of a dying empire.
Anonymous No.16701396 [Report]
>>16701384
I'm up in Seattle unfortunately. I'm an OG Starlink employee who worked from the early development years up through 2021. Took a few years off and then went to work for Kuiper before deciding that shit was an unbelievable joke. Now I work for a local startup that's also insane and retarded but at least they pay me decent and don't make me work 16 hour days. Stoke wanted me to come work for them recently but I turned them down because they told me they were "trying to work DOWN to 80 hour weeks". At this point I might jump back in just to help kill Spacex out of spite. Maybe starting a family will have to wait a few more years...
Anonymous No.16701397 [Report]
>>16701392
update your priors anon population bomb isn't a thing anymore

the real blackpill is we have zero reason to go anywhere else and the human population will peak in the 2080s at something like 10 billion
Anonymous No.16701398 [Report] >>16701430
Maybe it's not the ULA sniper, but chinese hot air balloons.
Anonymous No.16701400 [Report]
I just wrote about some madman shooting the rockets like a couple of weeks ago.
Anonymous No.16701402 [Report] >>16701419
Holy fuck I'm getting so sick of this fucking company. What the actual fuck are they doing? Sure "le iterative testing" blah blah blah, but at some point you have to realise there's a serious problem with your vehicle that can't be resolved with preventative measures if it explodes three times in flight and out of nowhere on the ground.
Anonymous No.16701403 [Report]
>>16701251
WHAT
Anonymous No.16701404 [Report]
Does anyone know of a complete list of great filters or points supporting the rare Earth hypothesis? Every year it feels like a new study gets published discovering yet another factor that seems like a prerequisite for life to exist beyond just the obvious things.
Anonymous No.16701405 [Report] >>16701406 >>16701407
Anonymous No.16701406 [Report] >>16701416 >>16701434
>>16701405
>Anomaly
What is this, a Star Trek episode?
Anonymous No.16701407 [Report]
>>16701405
Anonymous No.16701408 [Report]
WHAT
Anonymous No.16701409 [Report] >>16701412
>>16701251
https://youtu.be/eAoR4h6SQGg
Anonymous No.16701410 [Report] >>16701586
>>16701313
Launchpad: Destroyed
Chopsticks: Gone
Anonymous No.16701411 [Report] >>16701432
I just counted with my hand how many times in a row Starship failed, 4 times. I am scared... just 2 more failures and I need my second hand but I am not sure if I am able to count with 2 hands.....
Anonymous No.16701412 [Report]
>>16701409
oh my youtube poop nostalgia...
Anonymous No.16701416 [Report]
>>16701406
I think it's one of those Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena we've been hearing about.
Anonymous No.16701418 [Report] >>16701435
SpaceX is done
Anonymous No.16701419 [Report]
>>16701402
This is what happens when you run out of Nazi German scientists.
Anonymous No.16701420 [Report] >>16701424 >>16701427 >>16701439
NSF going schizo
Anonymous No.16701421 [Report] >>16701422 >>16701425
Give it to me straight.
How long before a new launch after this fuck up?
Anonymous No.16701422 [Report]
>>16701421
Two weeks
Anonymous No.16701423 [Report]
Red dragon on super heavy
Anonymous No.16701424 [Report] >>16701750
>>16701420
>:)
Anonymous No.16701425 [Report] >>16701440 >>16701631
>>16701421
Massey's has been damaged
so until that comes back online, they won't be able to test ship 37

i would say end of this year
Anonymous No.16701426 [Report]
>>16701371
the baikonur cosmodrone mission in bo1 was wrong
you wouldnt even need an rpg at that range
Anonymous No.16701427 [Report]
>>16701420
This is nothing new. ULA sniped AMOS-6 and it was hushed up to avoid an incident.
Anonymous No.16701428 [Report]
>>16701355
At least they got the data
Anonymous No.16701430 [Report] >>16701433
>>16701398
NOO LOOK AT ALL THAT PRECIOUS WASTED HYDROGEN WE WONT GET BACK
Anonymous No.16701432 [Report]
>>16701411
Sounds like you fear the thumb.
Anonymous No.16701433 [Report]
>>16701430
>hydrogen
nu/sfg/ moment
Anonymous No.16701434 [Report]
>>16701406
They even manated to create physical anomalies like in Stalker.
Anonymous No.16701435 [Report] >>16701620
>>16701418
They're not done but they're destined to become nothing more than a telecom company. Starlink will pay the bills and continue to grow for a few more years, launched by a dwindling but increasingly reliable fleet of F9s. Eventually, Starlink will be outcompeted by Kuiper (god forbid) or some other new startup and Spacex will be relegated to the status of "legacy contractor".

The dream of Mars colonization is dead. It has been for years. At best we will see Chinese boots and flags planted in 20 years.
Anonymous No.16701436 [Report]
We still goin' to mars in 2026?
Anonymous No.16701437 [Report] >>16701441
So Musk became a terrorist after Trump cut him off from funding. His next step will be to launch his rocket into twin towers
Anonymous No.16701439 [Report]
>>16701420
The commentators are still on copium
Anonymous No.16701440 [Report]
>>16701425
> end of this year
Ouch.
Anonymous No.16701441 [Report] >>16701443 >>16701446
>>16701437
they already have twin towers tho
Anonymous No.16701442 [Report]
>>16701313
Anonymous No.16701443 [Report] >>16701451
>>16701441
had*
Anonymous No.16701444 [Report]
>>16701287
Hypergolic propellant doesn't boil off into space :)
Anonymous No.16701445 [Report]
>>16701382
>unbelievably sophomoric fuckups
as opposed to freshman or senior fuckups?
Anonymous No.16701446 [Report] >>16701448 >>16701451
>>16701441
FUCK did it damage the second tower D:
Anonymous No.16701447 [Report] >>16701450 >>16701839
Saturn V:
>13 flights
>13 successes
>1960s

Starship:
>8 flights
>9 failures
>2020s
Why is SpaceX so shit?
Anonymous No.16701448 [Report]
>>16701446
It's not near the towers
Anonymous No.16701449 [Report] >>16701452 >>16701453 >>16701454
Things could go from bad, to worse, very quickly.

https://x.com/CSI_Starbase/status/1935577166567141382
Anonymous No.16701450 [Report]
>>16701447
not enough Germans
Anonymous No.16701451 [Report] >>16701457 >>16701627
>>16701443
>>16701446
The explosion was at Massey's, a dedicated test site a few miles from the launch site
Anonymous No.16701452 [Report] >>16701456
>>16701449
Oh boy!
Anonymous No.16701453 [Report] >>16701456
>>16701449
This nigger is always wrong
Anonymous No.16701454 [Report]
>>16701449
why does he have experience on this
Anonymous No.16701455 [Report]
>The Trumps send their regards
Anonymous No.16701456 [Report]
>>16701452
>>16701453
A reminder that he also said engine chill down was unique to Raptor
Anonymous No.16701457 [Report] >>16701462
>>16701451
Well it could have been worse
Anonymous No.16701458 [Report]
25 flights this year
Anonymous No.16701459 [Report] >>16701463 >>16701467 >>16701470
We're not in a simulation. This is baseline reality. We won't overcome the great filter due to human corruption and greed. We will get another ai winter. We will reduce our energy consumption and production to slow climate change. American and Chinese space industries will lose interest in developing large reusable rockets. Elon Musk will slowly age and pass away, resulting in his companies losing their drive and focus. We will have more regulation that will stifle innovation and start ups.
Anonymous No.16701460 [Report]
It's over for Starship really... just failure after failure
Anonymous No.16701462 [Report] >>16701466
>>16701457
i mean destroying your test site is pretty bad desu
they won't be launching anything until its repaired
Anonymous No.16701463 [Report]
>>16701459
>resulting in his companies losing their drive and focus.
WHAT drive and focus? They don't have any
Anonymous No.16701464 [Report] >>16701469 >>16701483
Spaceship will rise from the ashes stronger than before, like a Phoenix
Anonymous No.16701466 [Report]
>>16701462
Good. They need to slow down
Anonymous No.16701467 [Report]
>>16701459
There's also Bezos, who isn't INSANE
Anonymous No.16701468 [Report]
if the nazis won, we would have had a moonbase by now.

von braun was the product of them.
Anonymous No.16701469 [Report]
>>16701464
cope
im a thunderf00t, spaceguy5, css, and pressure fed astronaut GOD now
Anonymous No.16701470 [Report]
>>16701459
>We will get another ai winter
Thank G-d. That shit has been going way too fast.
Anonymous No.16701472 [Report] >>16701473 >>16701478 >>16701481 >>16701499 >>16701532
Anonymous No.16701473 [Report] >>16701474
>>16701472
>s37 and s38 are not far behind
yeah but they won't be testing them anytime soon
Anonymous No.16701474 [Report]
>>16701473
Musk is crazy enough to "test in production" if you catch my drift
Anonymous No.16701475 [Report]
What happened to the "starship will reach orbit before SLS/New Glenn clownoids?
Anonymous No.16701476 [Report] >>16701480
Does nothing wins
how does he do it?
Anonymous No.16701478 [Report]
>>16701472
Holy cope
Anonymous No.16701479 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701480 [Report]
>>16701476
Sorry I posted the wrong pic
Anonymous No.16701481 [Report]
>>16701472
SpaceX's own engineers no longer give a shit because they're paid minimum wage
Anonymous No.16701482 [Report] >>16701489
These threads are only propelled by like 5 devoted spergs and a few bots, right?
Anonymous No.16701483 [Report]
>>16701464
Definitely ashes, I feel like I'm at a funeral
Anonymous No.16701484 [Report] >>16701487
>>16701344
The entire premise of """"Starship"""" (renamed three times to try and distract normoids and trick them into thinking they haven't been failing at this for more than a decade now) is complete nonsense. There's no way to salvage any of the work here until they admit this, which they can't because of elon's hubris in wanting to have le biggest rocket in le history. It's a bunch of reddit engineers working for reddit management.
Anonymous No.16701487 [Report] >>16701488 >>16701489
>>16701484
No way to salvage anything? What about the engines.
Anonymous No.16701488 [Report]
>>16701487
Not even them. They are cursed
Anonymous No.16701489 [Report]
>>16701482
there's been a lot of /pol/ immigrants recently
>>16701487
i think the engines are the root cause
Anonymous No.16701492 [Report] >>16701495 >>16701502
Honestly I don't understand how super heavy with its 33 engines ended up being more reliable than the spaceship itself
Anonymous No.16701493 [Report] >>16701496
Why not stick raptors on a falcon 9
Anonymous No.16701494 [Report]
Imagine 400 people boarding one of these things
Anonymous No.16701495 [Report]
>>16701492
Different teams?
Anonymous No.16701496 [Report] >>16701497
>>16701493
Methane version of falcon 9? That's zubrins starship mini, right?
Anonymous No.16701497 [Report]
>>16701496
Yeah I mean why not? The only reason I've heard is
>oh it's not worth it compared to starship
but starship seems like a janky piece of trash
Anonymous No.16701499 [Report] >>16701506 >>16701506
>>16701472

>silver lining : it could've been worse
Anonymous No.16701501 [Report] >>16701503 >>16701505 >>16701507
>Artist's impression of tundra on an inhabited planet around a spectral class F5 star.
G and F type stars FTW, shan't live around a permanent piss-tint daytime.
Anonymous No.16701502 [Report] >>16701632
>>16701492
Organisation dysfunction at the production level. While Elon has been having fun in washington, the company has been floundering
Anonymous No.16701503 [Report] >>16701533
>>16701501
All stars appear white, yes even red dwarfs. Only brown dwarfs appear visibly red.
Anonymous No.16701504 [Report] >>16701508 >>16702571
How have they been developing Raptor since 2010 and still not figured it out? The Soviets figured this stuff out in the 70s...
Anonymous No.16701505 [Report] >>16701535
>>16701501
that's a screenshot from SpaceEngine
Anonymous No.16701506 [Report]
>>16701499
>>16701499
To be fair, that's essentially what a silver lining is
Anonymous No.16701507 [Report] >>16701511
>>16701501
A civilization built around a white dwarf will last forever...
Anonymous No.16701508 [Report] >>16701513
>>16701504
It's not like it's rocket science
Anonymous No.16701509 [Report]
>>16701383
No.
Anonymous No.16701511 [Report] >>16701552 >>16701705
>>16701507
Red dwarf is better. It has normal light you can use, and just look at it, it's white. It's not red.
White dwarfs are pure cancer, spewing out UV
Anonymous No.16701512 [Report] >>16701514 >>16701651
Anonymous No.16701513 [Report] >>16701519
>>16701508
Imagine making a bad omelette ten times in a row and then storming out of your kitchen while muttering "cooking is hard" under your breath. That's SpaceX right now lmao
Anonymous No.16701514 [Report]
>>16701512
Elon doesn't give a shit. He's just tweeting crap about his drug test.
Anonymous No.16701516 [Report] >>16701518
https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1935567072114667775
>Starship 36 exploding during testing tonight.

kino
Anonymous No.16701518 [Report]
>>16701516
The tanks look ok desu
Anonymous No.16701519 [Report] >>16701527
>>16701513
Being a level-headed engineer and having to work under a lunatic has got to be demoralizing.
Anonymous No.16701520 [Report] >>16701522
https://x.com/rookisaacman/status/1935571474678460754
Anonymous No.16701522 [Report] >>16701525
>>16701520
Literally who?
Anonymous No.16701524 [Report] >>16701541
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1935531784978186276

first time I've seen Musk mention Sergio Gor
he was supposedly the perso that convinced Trump to drop Jared Isaacmans nomination due to a grudge against Musk, Musk called him out in a cabinet meeting for working too slowly
Anonymous No.16701525 [Report]
>>16701522
not sure if bait or retarded
Anonymous No.16701527 [Report]
>>16701519
Maybe their morale would improve if they built a rocketship that didn't explode
Anonymous No.16701528 [Report]
>>16701143
Looks cool. If they'll be financing this themselves, then I support it.
Anonymous No.16701529 [Report] >>16701545
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1935452434039718375
>The WSJ & New York Times fake “journalists” lied through their teeth about me.
>Now let’s see their drug test results.
>They will fail.

Musk also showed test results from hair
Anonymous No.16701530 [Report]
>>16701251
Wow.
Anonymous No.16701531 [Report]
https://x.com/_Testflight_/status/1935327312372973683
Anonymous No.16701532 [Report]
>>16701472
And just think of all the science they'll be able to do on the ground to iterate future ships while they wait for Massey's to be fixed!
Anonymous No.16701533 [Report]
>>16701503
>All stars appear white, yes even red dwarfs.
Is this actually true or not? I keep hearing about this and based on just putting a light source with the temperature of an incandescent bulb in a 3d scene and cranking up the luminosity stupidly high kind of gives me that impression but I was never able to accurately test it because programs like Blender are a shit and don't work well with astronomically high values for distance and light, and Space Engine & Universe Sandbox are toys in the department of accurate light colors.
Anonymous No.16701534 [Report]
https://x.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1935550661396984216
>Ship 36 explodes during static fire attempt at Massey's.
>Here's what it looked like earlier this afternoon, June 18th.
Anonymous No.16701535 [Report]
>>16701505
oh yeah? which star system?
Anonymous No.16701536 [Report] >>16701990
>>16701069
just post the Handmer article, its also where the pic that is posted more often comes from

https://caseyhandmer.wordpress.com/2019/11/28/domes-are-very-over-rated/
Anonymous No.16701537 [Report] >>16701543 >>16701621
>randomly explodes on the pad

Starship program is cooked lmao welcome to the Chinese century lads.
Anonymous No.16701541 [Report] >>16701546 >>16701553
>>16701524
Is Musk trying to set the world record for accumulating the most enemies?
Anonymous No.16701543 [Report] >>16701548 >>16702595
>>16701537
masseys should be fixed before v3 ship is ready
might mean that the remaining v2s (S37 and S38) are skipped if it takes too long to fix
Anonymous No.16701545 [Report] >>16701876
>>16701529
Not saying that's fake but why on Earth would you believe a billionaire's claim of having a negative drug test? Do you really think he couldn't easily buy a negative result?
Anonymous No.16701546 [Report]
>>16701541
he was already an enemy before this post
Anonymous No.16701548 [Report]
>>16701543
the boosters
Anonymous No.16701550 [Report]
https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1935570009587110152

something that have come up to me has been sabotage through being sloppy on purpose
Anonymous No.16701552 [Report] >>16701560 >>16701566 >>16701705
>>16701511
>if you look at it, its white
>shows optical image showing the visible incandescent tint
Anonymous No.16701553 [Report] >>16701559 >>16701569
>>16701541
Gained himself one enemy and probably gave that guy significantly more
Anonymous No.16701554 [Report]
>>16701301
so the header tanks failed or something?

https://x.com/CSI_Starbase/status/1935549822674592233
Anonymous No.16701555 [Report]
>wake up
>somehow even worse news
>go to sleep
>wake up
>somehow even worse news
>go to sleep
>
haahaha oh my fucking god
Anonymous No.16701557 [Report] >>16701574
If Alpha Centauri has planets, where would the orbital plane be? We already know Proxima Centauri's is only partially aligned, and the orbit likely means it cannot be the same as the binary pair.
Anonymous No.16701559 [Report] >>16701564
>>16701553
Gor was already an enemy
Anonymous No.16701560 [Report]
>>16701552
Ok now look at the middle. It's white. There is a slight red tint but it's overwhelmingly white
Anonymous No.16701562 [Report]
two more weeks right
Anonymous No.16701564 [Report]
>>16701559
Well the math works out even better, then
Anonymous No.16701566 [Report]
>>16701552
Does it look like this? The way it's always drawn? A dim, baleful red sun rising enormously over the horizon its wretched planets?
No it looks like a normal white star with a hint of red around the edges.
Anonymous No.16701569 [Report]
>>16701553
At least Gor's rockets don't explode
Anonymous No.16701570 [Report]
>>16701143
doesn't really fit the aestethic of SpaceX
Anonymous No.16701572 [Report]
The first evidence of failure isn't even where the tanks are. Main nor header.
Kind of looks like a feed line problem.
Anonymous No.16701574 [Report]
>>16701557
>Rigel Kentaurus has a planetary candidate observed through direct imaging, possibly a super-Neptune
>it shows up basically top down or bottom up from Eaety's perspective
Well, I guess that answers that question.
Anonymous No.16701575 [Report]
>>16701155
first this and then the explosion
Anonymous No.16701577 [Report]
will this cause an investigation?
Anonymous No.16701586 [Report] >>16701590 >>16701595 >>16701647
>>16701410
nigga this is masseys, not the launch site
Anonymous No.16701590 [Report] >>16701593 >>16701604
>>16701586
Nigger the entire site was destroyed
The fireball reached all the way from Masseys to the launch site
Anonymous No.16701592 [Report] >>16701598
>>16701316
kino, especially the secondary explosions at the start
Anonymous No.16701593 [Report]
>>16701590
Anonymous No.16701595 [Report]
>>16701586
Nigger the entire coast of texas was destroyed
The fireball reached all the way from Masseys to Houston
Anonymous No.16701598 [Report]
>>16701592
https://x.com/rodamn/status/1935559093797920888
Anonymous No.16701601 [Report] >>16701602
lmao. That was a nice adventure, but now it's over.
Anonymous No.16701602 [Report]
>>16701601
this is one of many similar test explosions
its nowhere near over
Anonymous No.16701604 [Report]
>>16701590
Anon stop being retarded, S36 had at most a 10% prop load.
Anonymous No.16701605 [Report]
>>16701326
"cool"
its fine
Anonymous No.16701607 [Report]
>>16701326
>I don't think we making it out of the hood (Earth) bro
Anonymous No.16701608 [Report]
>>16701341
it blew up
Anonymous No.16701609 [Report] >>16701613 >>16701999
More scientists wasting everyone's time. A 30,000 km space elevator beanstaking Ceres. For all that work, not as much benefit as you might think. 60% reduction in energy to toss mass off surface and a 15% fuel savings.
Anonymous No.16701612 [Report]
>>16701382
the valuation is driven by starlink more than anything, I doubt this will affect the valuation much
Anonymous No.16701613 [Report] >>16701641
>>16701609
what's the point of a space elevator for a body with such low gravity
Anonymous No.16701614 [Report]
Toliman telescope when?
Anonymous No.16701615 [Report]
>>16701393
lmao
Anonymous No.16701619 [Report] >>16701623 >>16701643
>>16701382
How much is it down in %?
Anonymous No.16701620 [Report]
>>16701435
nah
Anonymous No.16701621 [Report]
>>16701537

V2 are exploding further back in the launch process. Next one blows up in the Gigabay.
Anonymous No.16701623 [Report]
>>16701619
There's no meaningful valuation of SpaceX shares so there's no price
Anonymous No.16701627 [Report]
>>16701451
5 miles from starfactory, almost 7 miles from the launch site
Anonymous No.16701630 [Report]
Another Starship destroyed the second tower
Anonymous No.16701631 [Report]
>>16701425

> Two launch towers
> One test site

Whoops! Found the Gate.
Anonymous No.16701632 [Report]
>>16701502
"fun"
not so sure about that lol
Anonymous No.16701633 [Report]
Stop being so negative folks, failure is how we learn, how else could they have learned that methane can explode?
Anonymous No.16701635 [Report] >>16701646 >>16701712
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71AwkBt3_ts
>SpaceX Starship 36 Explodes During Flight 10 Testing at Starbase

compilation of some NSF cameras
Anonymous No.16701641 [Report]
>>16701613

Someone trying to make tenure got a paper out of it. That was the point.
Anonymous No.16701643 [Report]
>>16701619
they get valued just a few times a year during secondaries (times when some outsiders can buy stock from current stockholders, including employees) or when SpaceX raises funds
last time SpaceX was valued at 350 bil
if I had to guess, this will not have an impact, the general trajectory has not changed and SpaceX has no real competition right now in launch or satellite broadband even if kuiper has had one launch
Anonymous No.16701644 [Report]
Thunderf00t won
Musk lost
Anonymous No.16701646 [Report] >>16701712
>>16701635

> Move the forward flaps slightly
> The ship explodes in a massive fireball

Okay, let's not do that again.
Anonymous No.16701647 [Report]
>>16701586
nigger the entire earth has been knocked off its axis
Who knows where we'll end up now
We might even end up in the orbit of Mars
Anonymous No.16701648 [Report] >>16701661
>>16701341
Catastrophic Over Pressure Event
Anonymous No.16701650 [Report] >>16701657
https://x.com/theshapeofstars/status/1935553476001485171
Anonymous No.16701651 [Report]
>>16701512
Anonymous No.16701652 [Report] >>16701747
> NASA's FIRMS (Fire Information for Resource Management System) detected the blast.

*waves*
Anonymous No.16701653 [Report] >>16701658
The solution is just to build China size solid motor factories to drop the cost to nothing and do away with this reusable liquid propellant nonsense
Anonymous No.16701654 [Report]
https://x.com/StarshipGazer/status/1935612630057546071
Anonymous No.16701656 [Report] >>16702005
The Long March 9, which extensively references the Starship, will be delayed.
Anonymous No.16701657 [Report]
>>16701650
Why do spaceflight enthusiasts sound like homosexuals now?
Anonymous No.16701658 [Report]
>>16701653
Anonymous No.16701659 [Report] >>16701712 >>16701793 >>16702028
https://x.com/RyanHansenSpace/status/1935582031255085273
>Initial armchair aerospace engineer analysis suggests one of the COPVs in the payload bay, which are arranged around the header tank transfer tubes, may have blown and punched a hole in the windward side of the ship while also severing both header tank transfer tubes. Ship belly starts to unzip and the fwd dome is damaged leading to mixing and ignition. Important to note that there were workers up around the payload bay on S36 in recent days after the successful single engine static fire.

https://x.com/RyanHansenSpace/status/1935587787891515775
>Here are the COPVs in question. There are 6 dark cylinders, 3 on each side of the header tank transfer tubes. This is right at the base of the nose cone where the initial puff appears.
Anonymous No.16701660 [Report] >>16701664
https://x.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1935567018163315039
>These 2 images were taken 3 months apart: February 24 - May 25, 2024.
>Hopefully the stand can be repaired soon.
Anonymous No.16701661 [Report]
>>16701648
source?
Anonymous No.16701662 [Report]
Can't catch a break with those ULA snipers
Anonymous No.16701663 [Report]
>that moment when you finally find that one scientific paper you were looking for and it scratches the autism just right and gives the data you needed for the project
Anonymous No.16701664 [Report]
>>16701660
Anonymous No.16701666 [Report]
https://x.com/JerryPikePhoto/status/1935566487219216625
>60 FPS Half-Speed replay of Ship 36s RUD tonight
Anonymous No.16701667 [Report] >>16701669 >>16701670
https://x.com/TheRocketFuture/status/1935565787286364386
>Close Detailed Video of the SpaceX Starship Explosion from 1.8 miles Starbase, TX
4K version will be available shortly in the other place.
>Some animals in the foreground, a safe distance away, but scared for sure!
Anonymous No.16701668 [Report]
>SpaceX really became a powerhouse after CRS-7 RUD
>Starship first major RUD today
You know what this means right?
200 launches a year soon
Anonymous No.16701669 [Report]
>>16701667
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yw_AABU4h1E

the 4k
Anonymous No.16701670 [Report]
>>16701667
kek, dozens of beetles might have died right there
Anonymous No.16701671 [Report] >>16701672 >>16701673 >>16701675
What the fuck happend to SpaceX
Anonymous No.16701672 [Report]
>>16701671
Talent bleed. I'd fuck off to if I was asked to go back wageslaving like a third rate worker instead of comfy WFH.
Anonymous No.16701673 [Report]
>>16701671
It's just a rough patch.
Anonymous No.16701675 [Report]
>>16701671
this is not unusual
Anonymous No.16701676 [Report] >>16701679
Why did Elon risk the Trump curse? He'll be broke in 2 years ;_;
Anonymous No.16701677 [Report]
https://x.com/ShanaDiez/status/1935579087487013232
Anonymous No.16701678 [Report]
https://x.com/AlexanderJ91756/status/1935572224410620107
Anonymous No.16701679 [Report]
>>16701676
He has lost the mandate of heaven...
Anonymous No.16701680 [Report]
>>16701251
>>16701301
>>16701313
so... two more weeks?
Anonymous No.16701681 [Report]
RIP SpaceX
Anonymous No.16701682 [Report]
good morning esefg-

oh...
Anonymous No.16701683 [Report] >>16701684
https://x.com/ESGhound/status/1935552978666025239
Anonymous No.16701684 [Report] >>16701687
>>16701683
N1 on steroids. The cybertruck of aerospace
Anonymous No.16701685 [Report]
https://x.com/DrChrisCombs/status/1935552833740316887
Anonymous No.16701687 [Report]
>>16701684
is it you that has been posting this? faggot
Anonymous No.16701688 [Report]
On the test stand, the mighty test stand,
The Starship RUDs tonight

Near the Starbase, the peaceful Starbase,
The Starship RUDs tonight
Anonymous No.16701690 [Report] >>16701693 >>16701695 >>16701699 >>16701841
https://x.com/peterrhague/status/1935605246077636956
Anonymous No.16701691 [Report]
I think the test stand might be ok actually, minus the smaller bits
Anonymous No.16701692 [Report] >>16701694 >>16701698
Should just make an expendable Starship at this point. No flaps or landing hardware. Just a steel tube with some engines under it. Sure, would cost like 20 million extra a launch but now you can get +250t to LEO.
Anonymous No.16701693 [Report]
>>16701690
Holy mother of copes
Anonymous No.16701694 [Report]
>>16701692
i think this is what they will pivot too
Anonymous No.16701695 [Report] >>16702619
>>16701690
I don't think Elon gives a shit about Mars anymore so he won't be trying hard for anything
Anonymous No.16701696 [Report]
beatings will continue until success rate improves
Anonymous No.16701698 [Report]
>>16701692
How would that prevent it exploding before orbit?
Anonymous No.16701699 [Report]
>>16701690
Anonymous No.16701702 [Report]
this is a nothingburger, SpaceX will fix the test site in a month or two and launch S37 and S38 and then switch to Block 3 and keep launching
its the middle of June now, the first Block 3 will launch by the end of the year or start of next year, so there is still like 6 months before that
masseys fix takes 1-2 months that still gives 4 months to launch the final block 2 stacks

this might actually not effect the timeline at all
Anonymous No.16701703 [Report] >>16701710 >>16701720
Hey PSA if you're in the area I'd seal your doors and windows. This thing has distributed several TONS of silica fiber (from the tiles) towards population centers. This stuff is akin to Asbestos. Stay safe.
Anonymous No.16701705 [Report]
>>16701511
>>16701552
>False color Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 image taken in 2013. The bright lines are diffraction spikes.
both of you are btfo
Anonymous No.16701706 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701708 [Report]
@anon Hey I have to go to the bathroom, can you watch Ship 36 real quick
Anonymous No.16701709 [Report]
HULLO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0C_L-qgHsE0
Anonymous No.16701710 [Report] >>16701711 >>16701720
>>16701703
its not going to be airborne you retard
Anonymous No.16701711 [Report] >>16701714 >>16701720
>>16701710
its already deposited dust and shit everywhere down wind
Anonymous No.16701712 [Report]
>>16701635
>>16701646
forward flap tested not long before the explosion
how could that affect the COPVs? >>16701659
maybe the flap movement was just a coincidence
Anonymous No.16701714 [Report] >>16701720
>>16701711
dust, not atomized tiles
Anonymous No.16701716 [Report]
ULA sniper
Anonymous No.16701718 [Report]
someone's getting fired and screamed at lmao
Anonymous No.16701719 [Report]
CNN: Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Rocket Test
Anonymous No.16701720 [Report]
>>16701703
>>16701710
>>16701711
>>16701714
Few if any towns in that area, just cows and fugitive kangaroos. Port Isabel and SPI are upwind of whatever is in that radar image.
Anonymous No.16701722 [Report] >>16701725
lol
Anonymous No.16701723 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701725 [Report]
>>16701722
kek
Anonymous No.16701726 [Report]
Good morning /sfg/, thinking abo- OH MY GOD
Anonymous No.16701729 [Report]
Yeah, that shit won't have a human boarding it until 2035. I can't fucking believe chinks will get back to the moon first.
Anonymous No.16701732 [Report]
Block 2 really gets the biggest useless piece of shit award
Anonymous No.16701734 [Report]
I told you to start learning Mandarin, you didn't listen.
Anonymous No.16701735 [Report] >>16701736 >>16702016
well class, what did we learn?
Anonymous No.16701736 [Report] >>16701763
>>16701735
spics are bad workers
Anonymous No.16701740 [Report]
>>16701251
HOLY SHIT LOOOL
Anonymous No.16701741 [Report]
>>16700950 (OP)
Anonymous No.16701742 [Report] >>16701744
Anonymous No.16701744 [Report]
>>16701742
he's seething lmao
Anonymous No.16701747 [Report]
>>16701652
hey
Anonymous No.16701749 [Report] >>16701752
at the rate starship is regressing i expect the stainless steel rolls to start spontaneously combusting in a weeks time
ChatTDG !!Z0MA/4gprbd No.16701750 [Report] >>16701764 >>16702621
>>16701424

XD
Anonymous No.16701752 [Report]
>>16701749
kek
Anonymous No.16701757 [Report]
they probably need hazmat suits to enter the area
Anonymous No.16701760 [Report] >>16701762 >>16701763
it's brain drain is my opinion.
Anonymous No.16701762 [Report]
>>16701760
Clearly.
Anonymous No.16701763 [Report] >>16701770 >>16701804
>>16701760
No, it's >>16701736
They hire retards who don't care about QC.
Anonymous No.16701764 [Report]
>>16701750
>MR MUSK, WHERE ARE YOU?
Anonymous No.16701765 [Report]
Mars in 2026
Trust the plan
Anonymous No.16701767 [Report]
well, time to get a different hobby for the next six months
Anonymous No.16701770 [Report] >>16701782
>>16701763
haven't they made some kind of commitments to hire locally a lot
but this could be just a freak accident like with AMOS-6 COPVs
something weird new happening that they know how to prevent in the future
Anonymous No.16701771 [Report] >>16701773 >>16701776
So guys we're still good for Starship Flight 10 at the end of June?
Anonymous No.16701773 [Report]
>>16701771
yeah it'll be the bomb
Anonymous No.16701776 [Report]
>>16701771
Yes, June 2026
Anonymous No.16701778 [Report] >>16701780 >>16702018
Procyon A is weird. Despite being 1.478-1.5ish solar masses, it is already appears to be in the subgiant phase despite models predicting a 1.5 solar mass F-type star to have a lifetime of 3.75 billion years, yet estimates put Procyon A as being less than 2 billion years old. Assuming the model is correct, it would need to be closer to 1.9 solar masses initially and have shed about 0.5 solar masses to get to where it is now.
Anonymous No.16701779 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701780 [Report] >>16701809
>>16701778
>Procyon A is weird
YOU'RE weird
Anonymous No.16701782 [Report]
>>16701770
That wouldn't be such a big deal if management wasn't retarded. If you had smart and responsible people then they would fire those lazy retards.
Anonymous No.16701784 [Report]
https://x.com/BCCarCounters/status/1935656559037563280
>Just in case it was not clear, the @FAANews
has confirmed to me that ground testing is not a licensed activity with the FAA, that demands any sort of mishap investigation.
>This will be a purely SpaceX conducted investigation.
Anonymous No.16701787 [Report] >>16701793 >>16701799 >>16701874 >>16702227
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1935660973827952675
>Preliminary data suggests that a nitrogen COPV in the payload bay failed below its proof pressure.
>If further investigation confirms that this is what happened, it is the first time ever for this design.
Anonymous No.16701790 [Report] >>16701795 >>16701859 >>16702227
When are we cancelling Starship?
Anonymous No.16701793 [Report]
>>16701787
so one of these >>16701659
Anonymous No.16701795 [Report]
>>16701790
"does nothing" is really descriptive
Anonymous No.16701796 [Report] >>16701802
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1935662667492139188
Anonymous No.16701797 [Report]
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1935657396229329167
Anonymous No.16701799 [Report]
>>16701787
so it got sniped?
Anonymous No.16701801 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701802 [Report]
>>16701796
He’s at his low point
Anonymous No.16701803 [Report] >>16701854
SpaceX's failure might convince Honda to start a permanent rocket division since their competitor is facing problems
Anonymous No.16701804 [Report]
>>16701763
Nail on the head. t. Knower
Anonymous No.16701805 [Report] >>16701811 >>16701831
I know; I’ll call the president a pedophile and call for his impeachment then blow up my rocket
Anonymous No.16701808 [Report] >>16702308
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BgJEXQkjNQ
>SpaceX - Static Fire Anomaly - AMOS-6 - 09-01-2016

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMOS-6_(satellite)
>On 2 January 2017, SpaceX released an official statement indicating that the cause of the failure was a buckled liner in several of the Composite overwrapped pressure vessel (COPV) tanks, causing perforations that allowed liquid and/or solid oxygen to accumulate between the liner and the overwrap, which was ignited by friction.[14]
Anonymous No.16701809 [Report]
>>16701780
>YOU'RE weird
I AM.
Anonymous No.16701810 [Report] >>16701835 >>16702142
>Elon stops tard wrangling SpaceX for half a year
>Nothing but failure after failure after failure
So much for the "he just got lucky and hired the best people for the job by pure accident" cope
Anonymous No.16701811 [Report] >>16701840 >>16702020
>>16701805
lmao you're really seething huh
Anonymous No.16701813 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701814 [Report] >>16701980
COPV HATE
Anonymous No.16701815 [Report]
Rock bottom vibes
Anonymous No.16701816 [Report] >>16701820 >>16701823 >>16701826
>SpaceX is finished because defective COPV exploded
go back to /pol/ retards
Anonymous No.16701818 [Report] >>16701873
Anonymous No.16701819 [Report]
are these COPVs even parts they make themselves? or are they supplied from a third party
Anonymous No.16701820 [Report] >>16701821 >>16701965
>>16701816
Coping like it’s not a big deal lol
Anonymous No.16701821 [Report] >>16701824 >>16701829 >>16701833
>>16701820
The flight failures weren't a big deal and this is considerably less than that
Anonymous No.16701823 [Report] >>16701825 >>16701842
>>16701816
>Dude it's not their fault they put defective COPV in the exact place they can blow up the entire rocket when they fail
Anonymous No.16701824 [Report]
>>16701821
Thanks for doubling down and proving my point :)
Anonymous No.16701825 [Report]
>>16701823
>fault
You don't understand. The magnitude of a problem doesn't depend on who is at fault
Anonymous No.16701826 [Report] >>16701834
>>16701816
They have been making COPVs for how long now? It’s meant to carry human beings.
Anonymous No.16701829 [Report] >>16701834
>>16701821
At a certain point your iterative program has to stop blowing up and actually start working
Anonymous No.16701830 [Report] >>16701836 >>16701858
You guys don't get it, they got so much data out of this failure, it was totally worth it
Anonymous No.16701831 [Report] >>16701840
>>16701805
shut the fuck up
Anonymous No.16701832 [Report]
I'm a tier-1 muskrat and I trust the plan. Mars could explode and Elon would still have a colony on it by 2032.
Anonymous No.16701833 [Report] >>16701838
>>16701821
>erm yeah, the rockets were failing in flight but now they are failing before they can even be stacked for flight. Therefore it’s better!
Yes yes everything is normal comrade, perhaps I am delusional and should go to the infirmary!
Anonymous No.16701834 [Report]
>>16701826
>>16701829
Bitchmade kek
Go work for Peter Beck
Anonymous No.16701835 [Report] >>16701865
>>16701810
So, he's going to stop all the other distractions and re-dedicate himself to SpaceX since it cannot operate successfully without him?
Or he's going to keep acting like a spastic junkie that can't pay attention to anything for more than a few minutes? Can we get him some of that autism he claims to have so he will use autism's "deep special interest" power to get him to focus on Starship?
Anonymous No.16701836 [Report]
>>16701830
Kek
Anonymous No.16701837 [Report]
>>16701134
they arent generating aerodynamic lift therefor they are in space.
Anonymous No.16701838 [Report] >>16701840
>>16701833
>made up sentence that was never said
kys
Anonymous No.16701839 [Report] >>16701843 >>16702088
>>16701447
how can you have 8 flights and 9 failures you stupid cunt?
Anonymous No.16701840 [Report] >>16701844
>>16701811
>>16701831
>>16701838
Gonna cry?
Anonymous No.16701841 [Report] >>16701846
>>16701690
The 2026 window wasn't on the table even without the ship 36 RUD.
Anonymous No.16701842 [Report]
>>16701823
>in the exact place
You mean anywhere on the rocket lol
Anonymous No.16701843 [Report]
>>16701839
It’s called Starship being a piece of shit and failing in the sky and on the ground
Anonymous No.16701844 [Report]
>>16701840
holy seethe
Anonymous No.16701846 [Report] >>16701849 >>16701850 >>16701853 >>16701865
>>16701841
So Elon was wrong
Anonymous No.16701849 [Report] >>16701861
>>16701846
you are a tranny
Anonymous No.16701850 [Report]
>>16701846
Never heard of Elon Time?
Anonymous No.16701853 [Report]
>>16701846
He exaggerates these things all the time and sets expectations slightly higher than reality
Anonymous No.16701854 [Report] >>16701856
>>16701803
Does Japan's post-WWII restrictions on guided rockets impact Honda's ability to get into the market?
Anonymous No.16701856 [Report]
>>16701854
No
Anonymous No.16701857 [Report] >>16701863
https://x.com/PjMichael8/status/1935657277370905072
Anonymous No.16701858 [Report]
>>16701830
Anonymous No.16701859 [Report] >>16702583
>>16701790
Nothing wrong with getting rid of 32% of NASA. Problem is which 32% they get rid of. Unfortunately we know that orgs like NASA when forced to downsize, tend to let go of the people actually doing productive work while keeping the management layers and all the nepo hires.
Anonymous No.16701861 [Report] >>16701865
>>16701849
I'm not, but Elon's son certainly is
Anonymous No.16701863 [Report]
>>16701857
NOOOOO
You HAVE to make an expendable rocket now because the COPV exploding means reusable rockets are a bad idea retard
Anonymous No.16701865 [Report] >>16701868
>>16701835
>>16701846
>>16701861
>elon
>elon
>elon
you're parasocial with elon musk
lmao
Anonymous No.16701868 [Report] >>16701872
>>16701865
Don't project, and he's not going to give you a couple doge coins to defend him
Anonymous No.16701871 [Report] >>16701875 >>16701882 >>16701986
HOW DID HE KNOW???

>>16700837
Anonymous No.16701872 [Report] >>16701904
>>16701868
that is crazy kek. you are obsessed with "him"
touch grass immediately
Anonymous No.16701873 [Report] >>16701989
>>16701818
Anyone have the photo of the Starship wreckage that looks like a face
Anonymous No.16701874 [Report] >>16701878 >>16701880 >>16701884
>>16701787
I thought Starship is/was going to use autogenous pressurisation. The nitrogen was just a temporary thing? Go all in.
Anonymous No.16701875 [Report]
>>16701871
Not prophetic when starship currently has a 100% failure rate
Anonymous No.16701876 [Report]
>>16701545
>muh billionaire
Communism isnt an American thing. Hello commie
Anonymous No.16701878 [Report]
>>16701874
It's for spin start and purging not tank press
Anonymous No.16701880 [Report]
>>16701874
Yes true, though there is rumor they are giving up on autonomous pressurization
Anonymous No.16701882 [Report]
>>16701871
Inside job
Anonymous No.16701884 [Report]
>>16701874
raptor 3 will fix this
Anonymous No.16701885 [Report] >>16701893
Can they go back to the suborbital type test stand for cryo and static fire at the launch site?
Probably Massey's gonna take a while to repair
Anonymous No.16701887 [Report] >>16701892 >>16701895
It's still crazy to me that out of 9 Starship flights, SpaceX hasn't had a single one that ended without issues.
Also, why not just downsize the payload, and rocket size and make many of them for a Mars mission?
big dildo = big issues
small dildo = small issues
Anonymous No.16701890 [Report] >>16701894
Crazy how aside from one successful hop landing and the catching of super heavy (which granted is a great feat) spacex is still at the same place they were in 2020. It’s been five (5) years yet the same failures are keeping the program stalled. We were watching tanks hop and pop and explode during the pandemic. Maybe someone higher up at spacex can suggest they actually try iterating with their iterative program?
Anonymous No.16701891 [Report] >>16702814
@grok why don't you just design the spaceship?
Anonymous No.16701892 [Report]
>>16701887
Big rockets amortize fixed mass parts and are more efficient.
You always wanna go big although stuff like the heat shield and Raptor could have probably been ironed out at smaller scale first
Anonymous No.16701893 [Report]
>>16701885
no, there is no suborbital test stand at the launch site and building one would take longer than fixing this one
Anonymous No.16701894 [Report] >>16701900
>>16701890
IFT-1 was in 2023 wtf are you talking about?
And since IFT-1 there's been a bunch of milestones reached.
Anonymous No.16701895 [Report] >>16701903
>>16701887
wrong
flight 5 had no issues

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_flight_test_5
Anonymous No.16701896 [Report] >>16701898
Remember when people were doomerposting saying it would take a year to recover from this? Then it took like 2 months lol its the same thing
Anonymous No.16701898 [Report] >>16701906
>>16701896
its nowhere near the same thing
this is a nothingburger compared to IFT-1 pad explosion
Anonymous No.16701899 [Report] >>16701909
Remember when tards were blaming FAA for slowing down Starship progress?
I bet they only did so well before because FAA forced them to a proper investigation and fix stuff, now they have free reign and look where it got them
Anonymous No.16701900 [Report] >>16701902
>>16701894
>since IFT-1 there's been a bunch of milestones reached
Lol
Anonymous No.16701902 [Report]
>>16701900
just last flight they reused a booster
Anonymous No.16701903 [Report]
>>16701895
>flight 5 had no issues
wrong
ChatTDG !!Z0MA/4gprbd No.16701904 [Report]
>>16701872

Lucky guess.
Anonymous No.16701905 [Report]
It's unironically not that bad because V2 ships are useless and won't launch any real payloads beside shitlink simulators, Massey's will be repaired in time for V3
Anonymous No.16701906 [Report] >>16701907
>>16701898
Is that photo not from IFT-1?
Anonymous No.16701907 [Report] >>16701913
>>16701906
I mean IFT-1 pad explosion was much worse and still just took a few months to fix
this explosion delays things, but its not a massive problem like the doomers think it is (and think every mishap is basically)
they are going to fix masseys and keep testing
Anonymous No.16701908 [Report]
Incredible amounts of sugarcoating from Muskrats ITT
Anonymous No.16701909 [Report] >>16701916
>>16701899
>now they have free reign
But nothing changed with the FAA?
Anonymous No.16701910 [Report] >>16701912
Mr GPT told me one of the SLS RS25 engines costs more than a full starship stack. Is that true or is samas baby hallucinating again?
Anonymous No.16701912 [Report] >>16701921
>>16701910
Yeah it's true
Anonymous No.16701913 [Report] >>16701915
>>16701907
>I mean
gb2r
Anonymous No.16701914 [Report] >>16701917 >>16701920 >>16701923
so what happens now?
Anonymous No.16701915 [Report]
>>16701913
stfu fag
Anonymous No.16701916 [Report]
>>16701909
Like they're still requiring investigations for the last flight failures.
All the test tank ground explosions didn't reauire investigations either
Anonymous No.16701917 [Report]
>>16701914
they fix the test stand and find out why the COPV exploded and keep testing
Anonymous No.16701920 [Report]
>>16701914
Another melty from the ‘Lon
Anonymous No.16701921 [Report] >>16701925 >>16701938
>>16701912
kek then what is all this shitflinging even about? I knew oldspace was a joke, but this is completely insane.
Is anduril vs traditional arms suppliers similarly crazy? I feel like I need to buy some stocks
Anonymous No.16701923 [Report]
>>16701914
Two weeks resets, again.
Anonymous No.16701925 [Report] >>16701935
>>16701921
Nah defense is a bit different. Everything is overpriced and there’s no incentive to undercut. Anduril products won’t be as good, and anything that IS as good or better than what boeing or lockmart or grumman or raytheon etc will be given the same price range contract.
If we go to war; buy. That’s true of everyone tho
Anonymous No.16701927 [Report]
>>16701383
Yes.
Anonymous No.16701934 [Report] >>16701966
>>16701251
Imagine 1000 people in this pos when it exploded.
Anonymous No.16701935 [Report]
>>16701925
>no incentive to undercut
Yeah but if I as a potential investor and non-us taxpayer only care about company profitability that's a plus.
Anonymous No.16701938 [Report]
>>16701921
SLS is just especially egregious and also human rated and also not produced in any real numbers so it's not comparable
Anonymous No.16701939 [Report] >>16701942 >>16701950 >>16701964
/sfg/ is ALIVE
Anonymous No.16701942 [Report] >>16701946
>>16701939
Ship 36 status?
Anonymous No.16701946 [Report]
>>16701942
In a better place.
Anonymous No.16701947 [Report] >>16702001
https://x.com/jackywacky_3/status/1935673043008835903
Anonymous No.16701950 [Report]
>>16701939
You could even say /sfg/ is EXPLODING
Anonymous No.16701951 [Report]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJRzQsLZGg
Anonymous No.16701953 [Report]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATP6_fFLFp0
Anonymous No.16701955 [Report] >>16701957 >>16702082
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qw3uaLRrYNY
Anonymous No.16701957 [Report]
>>16701955
there was a fire still 1.5h ago
Anonymous No.16701961 [Report] >>16701967
>>16701088
You could plug a hole in the ISS with your palm
Anonymous No.16701964 [Report]
>>16701939
Rapidly expanding post rate. It's on fire.
Anonymous No.16701965 [Report]
>>16701820
COPVing
Anonymous No.16701966 [Report]
>>16701934
You're confusing Starship with BFR
Anonymous No.16701967 [Report]
>>16701961
but i definitely saw a large xenomorph hybrid sucked out of a quarter sized hole. are you trying to tell me that movies dont always strive for scientific accuracy?
Anonymous No.16701968 [Report] >>16701979
>>16701273
Holy shit you're right. He lost the mandate of heaven after the Christmas meltdown
Anonymous No.16701971 [Report] >>16701977 >>16701991 >>16702082 >>16702103
https://x.com/clwphoto1/status/1935681757577166904
Anonymous No.16701977 [Report]
>>16701971
>scorched tanks
Anonymous No.16701979 [Report] >>16701987 >>16702036
>>16701273
>>16701968
Grim. Doesn’t help that he’s tweeting edgy atheist bioshock quotes. The hubris! He flew too close to the sun with his wax wings and God is enacting divine justice
Anonymous No.16701980 [Report]
>>16701814
ACAB
ALL COPV ARE BAD
Anonymous No.16701986 [Report]
>>16701871
He didn't say when.
Anonymous No.16701987 [Report]
>>16701979
He said "no gods" not "no God"
Anonymous No.16701988 [Report] >>16701992
>>16701326
https://youtu.be/SibnQt-oh2g
Anonymous No.16701989 [Report]
>>16701873
snate
Anonymous No.16701990 [Report] >>16701995
>>16701536
I already posted the article and I'm the one that posts the picture every day
Anonymous No.16701991 [Report]
>>16701971
doesn't look that bad
some starship debris around
Anonymous No.16701992 [Report] >>16701993 >>16702000
>>16701988
Anonymous No.16701993 [Report]
>>16701992
Holy fucking shiiiiiit. Kino. Sad, but kino
Anonymous No.16701995 [Report]
>>16701990
yeah I saw that
Anonymous No.16701997 [Report]
Anonymous No.16701999 [Report]
>>16701609
Did you guys know you can buy the materials for a Ceres space elevator on Amazon?
Anonymous No.16702000 [Report]
>>16701992
Anonymous No.16702001 [Report]
>>16701947
Anonymous No.16702002 [Report] >>16702003 >>16702025
So much for beating China to the Moon lol
Anonymous No.16702003 [Report] >>16702132
>>16702002
never spacex's goal
Anonymous No.16702005 [Report]
>>16701656
This is actually really funny kek
Anonymous No.16702008 [Report]
Anonymous No.16702012 [Report] >>16702017
New Glenn status?
Anonymous No.16702016 [Report] >>16702021 >>16702022 >>16702024
>>16701735
Hardware rich development is fine if you can mass produce hundreds of engines and your rocket hull can be contructed in an open field. But if your rocket is exploding and destroying critical infrastructure that can't be mass produced in a factor, suddenly you have issues.

I completely expected something like to happen btw. Rockets exploding is fine in orbit, but not so fine when it's happening to your launchpad. Even when SpaceX is able to produce dozens of Starships a year, if 1/20th of them explode on the launchpad or fail the tower catch, that's months of delay irregardless of how fast you can produce new rockets.

It's just the testing site today, but we will eventually see a launchpad go up in flames and a failed catch. Artemis III by 2035?
Anonymous No.16702017 [Report]
>>16702012
Not exploded (yet)
Anonymous No.16702018 [Report]
>>16701778
>observe stars for 0.0000001 billion years
>from several light years away
>from just the surface
>try to extrapolate to +/- several billion years
There's going to be a lot of weird shit when our model is this unavoidably inaccurate
Anonymous No.16702020 [Report]
>>16701811
No one who likes spaceflight isn't seething right now
Anonymous No.16702021 [Report] >>16702023
>>16702016
>irregardless
Anonymous No.16702022 [Report] >>16702023
>>16702016
that's why there's 5 launch pads
Anonymous No.16702023 [Report] >>16702029
>>16702022
But only one testing site?
>>16702021
ESL doesn't know how irregardless is meant to be used
Anonymous No.16702024 [Report] >>16702035
>>16702016
COPV was a problem for F9 as well, so this point is retarded
Anonymous No.16702025 [Report]
>>16702002
There's an argument that
1. it doesn't matter we already went to the moon 50 years ago
2. when Starship is operational we'll build colonies there
3. exploration missions =/= utilization (which is what matters)
Anonymous No.16702028 [Report] >>16702032 >>16702188
>>16701659
>WHAT?! ADD EVEN MORE FIRE SUPPRESSION YOU SAY?!

Unironically how do you fix COPVs ripping your ship in half
Anonymous No.16702029 [Report] >>16702040
>>16702023
its never meant to be used
Anonymous No.16702032 [Report]
>>16702028
you make better COPVs
Anonymous No.16702035 [Report] >>16702037 >>16702041 >>16702044
>>16702024
Every tower catch is running the risk of a massive catastrophic failure.
Anonymous No.16702036 [Report]
>>16701979
>atheist bioshock
jewish
https://youtu.be/RrFnsax4lvE?si=9Muab87KMqQx5tz4
If Elon were actually redpilled instead of whatever it is that's rotting his brain, several problems just wouldn't have happened.
Anonymous No.16702037 [Report] >>16702049
>>16702035
so what?
Anonymous No.16702040 [Report] >>16702042
>>16702029
it is
Anonymous No.16702041 [Report] >>16702049
>>16702035
so is driving your car on the highway
Anonymous No.16702042 [Report] >>16702045
>>16702040
its used by retards
Anonymous No.16702044 [Report] >>16702049
>>16702035
The booster is an empty tin can.
It would not be so bad if it exploded on the tower / pad while landing.
Before launch full stack explosion would absolutely melt the entire launch site to the ground though.
Anonymous No.16702045 [Report] >>16702046
>>16702042
its misunderstood by retards
Anonymous No.16702046 [Report] >>16702055
>>16702045
its not a real word, you are retarded
use regardless
Anonymous No.16702047 [Report] >>16702053
I don't understand why they can't just build and slap an adapter on Pad A and put Starship on top of it. We have seen them improvise shit all the time like the Raptor dance floor and disposable hot stage adapter. Would take no longer than a week to construct something that could adapt Starship to the normal pads rather than rolling up and down the road to masseys every fucking time. Would save a lot of time in the future too
Anonymous No.16702049 [Report] >>16702055
>>16702037
So having dozens of launches a year isn't feasible until Starship gets F9 tier reliability. When you're launching and catching that often, even slight chances of RUD on both takeoff and landing means that you're gonna roll snake eyes eventually. And of course, the sheer size and scale of Starship, the way SpaceX is pushing the performance of the engines and the fact that the design isn't even fully finalized yet, means that it's probably gonna to be decades before Starship is anywhere near the reliability of the F9.

Good thing that Lunar and Mars missions using Starship don't need 15+ refueling missions that has to be conducted within a period of weeks to avoid excessive fuel boil off... oh wait.
>>16702041
Maybe if my car was a cybertruck
>>16702044
Even a minor explosion will result in lots of damage to the tower, moving parts+the engineering complexibility needed to support Superheavy means that minor damage will still take it out of commission for a long while.
Anonymous No.16702050 [Report]
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/irregardless
>Although well attested, this word is widely regarded as nonstandard and incorrect. Its use is proscribed by many speakers, who consider it inappropriate in any formal setting.[1][5]
Anonymous No.16702052 [Report]
How much less thrust is needed for the upper stage if they switch to expendable?
Anonymous No.16702053 [Report] >>16702069
>>16702047
they could, but is that quicker than just fixing the test pad? and how much quicker is it
Anonymous No.16702054 [Report]
>>16700966
Look... they don't... you can't... It's fine!!!! Just shut up, OKAY!?!
Anonymous No.16702055 [Report] >>16702059 >>16702064
>>16702046
>its not a real word
yes. thats the point

>>16702049
>Maybe if my car was a cybertruck
catastrophic accidents happen everyday with or without a cybertruck.
Anonymous No.16702058 [Report] >>16702187
>>16700971
This is implicitly acknowledging they're not building shit.
Anonymous No.16702059 [Report] >>16702060
>>16702055
the point is to be retarded on purpose? are you just pretending? kek
Anonymous No.16702060 [Report] >>16702063
>>16702059
>the point is to be retarded on purpose?
its just a joke and used ironically. are you pretending to be autistic?
Anonymous No.16702063 [Report] >>16702070
>>16702060
Anonymous No.16702064 [Report] >>16702067 >>16702068 >>16702072
>>16702055
The point is that Starship by it's very design, development process, scale and size is gonna to be prone to failing more often than other rockets. Same for the tower catch. And again, due to said scale, them exploding or failing the landing is gonna cause alot more damage. A fully fueled Superheavy+Starship stack exploding will be legit a mini-nuke.
Anonymous No.16702067 [Report] >>16702079
>>16702064
it is what it is
Anonymous No.16702068 [Report] >>16702079
>>16702064
>A fully fueled Superheavy+Starship stack exploding will be legit a mini-nuke.
sure. thankfully it shows no signs of doing that.
Anonymous No.16702069 [Report] >>16702080 >>16702082
We really should have abandoned Block 2 after the third failure. I don't understand Musk's obsession with this piece of shit. If Block 3 truly fixes all these problems then they should have abandoned Block 2 a long time ago. It clearly is a failed experiment
>b-b-but not enough Raptor3s are ready!
If you just stop exploding you won't need to build more than a handful at a time.

>>16702053
Yes? They have to order/build new tanks, basically replace a whole facility and infrastructure that got nuked.

Giving Starship a way to use Pad A and Pad B would be 1000x easier of a solution right now than rebuilding Masseys. Plus the road closures and the fact that compared to Masseys Pad A is literally indestructible
Anonymous No.16702070 [Report]
>>16702063
just because you dont get a joke doesn't mean its retarded. try to remember that.
Anonymous No.16702072 [Report] >>16702079
>>16702064
Yeah that's why they're using their infinite Starlink money to constantly test to failure, and then significant Starlink launches to test hundreds of flights in normal operations, so when people finally ride it it's as safe as Falcon 9
Anonymous No.16702073 [Report] >>16702087
>>16701251
>Saarshit V2 has failed more times than V1 at this point with zero successes to offset
LMAOOOOOOOOOOO
Anonymous No.16702074 [Report]
>>16701120
>>16701134
They only fly when they're not in space. Groundsit or Groundroll, Airflight, and Spacedrift.
Anonymous No.16702079 [Report] >>16702086 >>16702091
>>16702067
No, it's a consequences of Elon's "hardware rich development". Again, you can pump out rockets from a factory by the hundreds, you can weld together stainless steel plates in open fields. But there's always gonna to be bottlenecks somewhere, and that somewhere is gonna to be launchpads if Starship keeps exploding at this rate, especially if Elon continues to push for more and more launches.
>>16702068
Starship has been going backwards for the last year.
>>16702072
Again, you can pump out Starships by the hundreds. Doesn't mean shit if the critical infrastructure like launchpads get blown up every 10th launch or 10th failed landing. Bottlenecks always exist somewhere. What's next? Building dozens of launchpads?
Anonymous No.16702080 [Report] >>16702098
>>16702069
but block 3 doesn't automatically just fix everything
this COPV failure is probably completely independent of Block 2 vs Block 3 and I would guess the leaks in the autogenuous pressurisation are also an independent problem not fixed by raptor 3s
Anonymous No.16702082 [Report] >>16702098 >>16702111
>>16702069
also they don't have to rebuild everything, the amount of damage is still unknown >>16701971
>>16701955
Anonymous No.16702083 [Report]
>>16701143
No, it's a grift from someone who wants to take a cut or maybe even all the dollarydoos.
Anonymous No.16702085 [Report] >>16702114
https://x.com/Dillonshrop06/status/1935560820009705920
possible partial power outage happened because of the starship explosion rattling something
Anonymous No.16702086 [Report] >>16702089
>>16702079
> Building dozens of launchpads?
yes actually
Anonymous No.16702087 [Report]
>>16702073
Because some times the best part is an actual part and not just shaved away in hopes that it's not necessary.
Anonymous No.16702088 [Report]
>>16701839
Because another one just cooked off on the ground long before launch? Holy fuck you're retarded.
Anonymous No.16702089 [Report] >>16702094 >>16702189
>>16702086
>Expendable launch infrastructure
Anonymous No.16702091 [Report] >>16702095 >>16702097
>>16702079
>Starship has been going backwards for the last year.
only when the booster comes back to land. bad jokes aside, yeah, its not done great recently but thats not to say its a permanent decline. just relax. why the driving urge to complain so much?
Anonymous No.16702094 [Report]
>>16702089
they will keep blowing up as much as is necessary until a rapidly reusable starship is reached
Anonymous No.16702095 [Report]
>>16702091
>why the driving urge to complain so much?

Oh I don't know, maybe Elon gutting NASA, creating DOGE, sucking off trump; only to have a tantrum afterwards. All while ignoring SpaceX
Anonymous No.16702097 [Report] >>16702100 >>16702101
>>16702091
he has EDS
Anonymous No.16702098 [Report] >>16702099 >>16702122
>>16702080
>block 3 doesn't fix everything
It (according to Musk) fixes the leaking that have blown up the last three IFT flights. SpaceX just needs to bite the bullet and move on to it already. The COPV failure is just a flashy nothingburger, it isn't a hard problem to solve just build stronger COPVs.

>>16702082
Pretty sure at least one of the tanks outside exploded. There is a reason that all the large vertical methane and oxidizer tanks around Pad A were turned into small horizontal ones behind a concrete blast shield
Anonymous No.16702099 [Report] >>16702102
>>16702098
That was what he said about block 2
Anonymous No.16702100 [Report]
>>16702097
many such cases
Anonymous No.16702101 [Report]
>>16702097
I have Elon Nigger Fatigue
Anonymous No.16702102 [Report] >>16702123
>>16702099
He only said block 2 would fix the nonexistent payload to orbit issue

We clearly see the leaks come out of both the raptor2 seams and the aft attic, both of which don't exist on Block 3.
Anonymous No.16702103 [Report] >>16702106 >>16702108 >>16702111
>>16701971
Anonymous No.16702106 [Report]
>>16702103
Not optimal
Anonymous No.16702107 [Report] >>16702192 >>16702194
Anonymous No.16702108 [Report]
>>16702103
Fishing starship parts
Anonymous No.16702109 [Report]
>>16701261
excellent observation
Anonymous No.16702111 [Report] >>16702113
>>16702082
>>16702103
I don't know man those tanks look pretty fucking close to the explosion. I think it is time to test Starships on Pad A and later B as well. It's not like they are testing that many different ships in tandem these days anyway, capacity is hardly an issue
Anonymous No.16702113 [Report] >>16702115
>>16702111
Most of the pipes probably need replacing too.
Anonymous No.16702114 [Report] >>16702124
>>16702085
nah i think it's just the camera exposure adjusting
Anonymous No.16702115 [Report]
>>16702113
>pipes
They are definitely fucked from that. You could see it wipe out the power as far as the factory with how much it shook the ground
Anonymous No.16702117 [Report] >>16702118 >>16702120 >>16702209
Why do they keep putting tons of unprotected infrastructure and tanks right next to the giant explodey fuel silo? Are SpaceX retarded?
Anonymous No.16702118 [Report]
>>16702117
No space
Anonymous No.16702120 [Report] >>16702129
>>16702117
Is this a new Massey's ship test stand? I don't know what I am looking at when people post random pictures
Anonymous No.16702121 [Report]
>>16701155
>An SPMT broke last night
>>16701251
>static fire test explosion
Elon shouldn't have made that tweet. Everything went downhill ever since.
Anonymous No.16702122 [Report]
>>16702098
it hasn't been the same leak
7 was a oxygen/fuel leak above the ship engine firewall (so in pipes leading into engines)
8 was a leak in the engines themselves
9 was a propellant leak probably (not known where yet) with autogenous pressure loss

v3 will solve flight 7 problem by not having a firewall/area where pressure can build up, but would not automatically solve the leaking issue in the pipes, they have to solve that anyway for block 3
8 is again a problem in the v2 raptors and at this point I think it is unknown if that is a problem that is inherent to v2 raptors or something that might be a problem for v3 raptors as well
9 again some other leak, might or might not be fixed "automatically" with block v3s
if anything v3s will be longer with longer propellant vacuum jacketed pipes

the COPV failure has nothing to do with V2 or V3 either I'm pretty sure

so 3/4 problems will have to be solved with or without moving onto raptor 3 I would think
Anonymous No.16702123 [Report]
>>16702102
the attic didn't cause the leak did it? the attic just enabled the leak to become a catastrophic problem by building up the pressure
Anonymous No.16702124 [Report] >>16702128
>>16702114
look closer, a few of the lights go off while others stay on
Anonymous No.16702127 [Report] >>16702130
Anonymous No.16702128 [Report] >>16702147
>>16702124
oh yeah the space x logo flickers for a sec
Anonymous No.16702129 [Report]
>>16702120
yes
Anonymous No.16702130 [Report]
>>16702127
>are ya winning, block 2?
Anonymous No.16702131 [Report] >>16702133 >>16702600
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGMta2525W4&
Anonymous No.16702132 [Report] >>16702134 >>16702138
>>16702003
So why did SpaceX pitch the Lunar starship HLS as an important part of Artmeis III? Because at this rate, it's Starship HLS that's gonna to be the main bottleneck of Artmeis III
Anonymous No.16702133 [Report]
>>16702131
>account for explosions under the ship
>forget to account for explosions above the ship
Oopsy
Anonymous No.16702134 [Report] >>16702146
>>16702132
for cash nigga
also Artemis 3 is still probably going to be the long lead item
Anonymous No.16702138 [Report] >>16702146
>>16702132
Beating out their competitors for the money
Anonymous No.16702142 [Report] >>16702160
>>16701810
>Elon acts like a turboretard, on top of abolishing WFH
>Talent start looking elsewhere before their SpaceX line on their CV becomes worthless
wow such surprise
Anonymous No.16702146 [Report] >>16702162
>>16702138
>>16702134
I thought Starlink was an infinite money printer?
Anonymous No.16702147 [Report]
>>16702128
>not even neon, just white LEDs
Grim
Anonymous No.16702150 [Report] >>16702158 >>16702211
>wake up
>check /sfg/
>spaceflight is over
Oh
And here I really thought we had a chance
Anonymous No.16702158 [Report]
>>16702150
There's no way to sugarcoat these composite overwrapped pressure vessels.

We should have known from the Titan submersible this was not the way
Anonymous No.16702160 [Report] >>16702167
>>16702142
You can't build starships from home
Anonymous No.16702162 [Report] >>16702169
>>16702146
more money never hurts
it also gave more credibility to the programme at the time, starlink wasn't really that mature then
not sure if the credibility or money is really needed now but it wasn't possible to know how well or quickly starlink would succeed

SpaceX got the initial award in April 2021 (before litigation and so on from bezos) but the competition was started in 2019
starlink was far from a guaranteed success at that time
Anonymous No.16702166 [Report] >>16702168 >>16702170 >>16702196
https://x.com/JerryPikePhoto/status/1935710504015593563
>Status of Masseys Test site as of this morning
Anonymous No.16702167 [Report]
>>16702160
>home
He was in the white house playing Diablo on his gaming PC like a retard while ships burned
Anonymous No.16702168 [Report] >>16702170
>>16702166
Anonymous No.16702169 [Report] >>16702171 >>16702173
>>16702162
As it is, Starship HLS is gonna be the main delay for Artemis III. I won't be surprised if Artemis III happened somewhere in the mid-2030s. The 15+ refueling trips for every landing is fucking stupid, even if Starship is wayyyy cheaper than SLS
Anonymous No.16702170 [Report]
>>16702166
>>16702168
Figuratively nothing left
Anonymous No.16702171 [Report]
>>16702169
it won't
Anonymous No.16702173 [Report] >>16702198
>>16702169
The real question is why, for the first time ever, has a COPV exploded? Are they pushing the pressure to extreme levels or did the autistic CEO start removing material from critical components to "save mass"?
Anonymous No.16702176 [Report] >>16702182
I think this is the highest resolution official render of CZ-10 we have yet kek.

According to the official planning
>In flight abort test of the CZ-10-launched Mengzhou
>Low altitude (hopper) test of CZ-10
are still planned for this year. However the main launch infrastructures at pad 301 of Wenchang and its associated dual VAB aren't nowhere ready for a launch this year.

Former could use a solid rocket or a CZ-5B, later may use one of those makeshift launch pad that were used for the test flight of the CZ-12A prototype a few months ago.
Anonymous No.16702177 [Report]
https://x.com/clwphoto1/status/1935681757577166904

From the boat
Anonymous No.16702179 [Report] >>16702184 >>16702213
>>16700950 (OP)
meanwhile, scientists:
>“The models were right”: astronomers find ‘missing’ matter
https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/XMM-Newton/The_models_were_right_astronomers_find_missing_matter
engineeggers BTFO
Anonymous No.16702182 [Report] >>16702224
>>16702176
Looks like they are really rushing for their lunar landing if they are testing the Mengzhou so much years before the intended rocket for it launches.
Anonymous No.16702184 [Report] >>16702186 >>16702203
>>16702179
all this time they had a 'dark' matter component of regular matter? lmao
Anonymous No.16702186 [Report]
>>16702184
it was under the couch
Anonymous No.16702187 [Report]
>>16702058
So one VR experience probably made by some intern just invalidates all the pictures and videos of them building shit?
Anonymous No.16702188 [Report] >>16702191
>>16702028
stop proonting them
Anonymous No.16702189 [Report]
>>16702089
>make everything reusable apart from the launchpads
eh, close enough
Anonymous No.16702191 [Report]
>>16702188
Are SpaceX's COPVs proonted?
Anonymous No.16702192 [Report]
>>16702107
Damn that's a lot of dirty air spraying out over texas.
Anonymous No.16702193 [Report] >>16702197 >>16702201
https://x.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1935567018163315039

maximum 3 month delay
minimum ~1-2 month
Anonymous No.16702194 [Report] >>16702195 >>16702200 >>16702217
>>16702107
>brownsville
Anonymous No.16702195 [Report] >>16702217
>>16702194
>On February 4, 1846, President James K. Polk instructed American General Zachary Taylor and his troops, including 2nd LT. Ulysses S. Grant, to begin moving south towards Brownsville. Once Taylor arrived, he built Fort Texas. It was later renamed Fort Brown in honor of Major Jacob Brown,[12] one of two soldiers who died during the siege of Fort Texas.[11][13]
Anonymous No.16702196 [Report]
>>16702166

"How did Starship do? To shreds you say. "

"How is the Test Site holding up? To shreds you say."
Anonymous No.16702197 [Report]
>>16702193
I'm gonna bet 2 1/2 weeks. After all, they could just skip the static fires entirely
>inhales copium
Anonymous No.16702198 [Report] >>16702202
>>16702173
>or did the autistic CEO start removing material from critical components to "save mass"?
but how could he do that when everyone says he was ignoring starship because he was in DC too much?
Anonymous No.16702200 [Report]
>>16702194
>KBRO
Anonymous No.16702201 [Report]
>>16702193

"Mars in 2026! 50/50 chance."
Anonymous No.16702202 [Report] >>16702206 >>16702586
>>16702198
They aren't mutually exclusive. Musk not being at SpaceX and Musk being at SpaceX both can fuck up Starshit in different ways
Anonymous No.16702203 [Report]
>>16702184
do you know what dark means?
Anonymous No.16702206 [Report]
>>16702202
of course
very convenient
Anonymous No.16702208 [Report] >>16702214 >>16702216 >>16702221 >>16702226 >>16702249
https://x.com/brickmack/status/1935707861939572959
For your consideration
Anonymous No.16702209 [Report]
>>16702117
best part is no part
Anonymous No.16702211 [Report] >>16702218
>>16702150
>wake up
>go to /sci/ 'log
>/sfg/ has 400 more posts during euro hours
uh oh
Anonymous No.16702213 [Report]
>>16702179
>it's antimatter
Anonymous No.16702214 [Report]
>>16702208
>MISHANDLERS COULD BE HERE
>MISHANDLERS COULD BE ANYWHERE
>I HATE MISHANDLERS
Anonymous No.16702216 [Report]
>>16702208

Now the Nitrogen tanks they added to suppress explosions in the hull are also exploding.

That's adorable!
Anonymous No.16702217 [Report]
>>16702194
>>16702195
nominative determinism
Anonymous No.16702218 [Report] >>16702219 >>16702220
>>16702211

SpaceX decided they had to do a test at Midnight because -- why were they doing a test at midnight? Couldn't they wait for morning and the day shift?
Anonymous No.16702219 [Report] >>16702235
>>16702218
Doesn't matter it still would have exploded, just later
Anonymous No.16702220 [Report]
>>16702218
>shift
work only stops when you pass out from exhaustion
Anonymous No.16702221 [Report] >>16702228
>>16702208
It's time for SpaceX to start dressing like adults!
Anonymous No.16702224 [Report] >>16702239
>>16702182
Mengzhou/Next generation crew capsule is just an older project than CZ-10.
They've been working on Mengzhou since early-mid 2010s, flew a subscale tech demo in 2016 (top left) then a full scale prototype to High earth orbit in 2020 (top right).

Meanwhile the CZ-10 architecture as we know it (before it was a more direct CZ-5 derivative with a different lunar architecture, bottom left) only dates from 2018, then because of the internal rivalries within the Public aerospace sector (Crewed spacecrafts are only made by CAST, but launchers are made by CALT, SAST, CASIC... see bottom right) they had to do an internal selection process over various launcher designs by different bureaux/subsidiaries. Full and exclusive start of CZ-10 dev probably only started in 2020.

Right now it is largely speculated that the ground infrastructure at Wenchang is the long lead item for CZ-10 and the reason why the maiden flight was delayed from late 2025 to 2026, and now speculated to be late 2026
Anonymous No.16702226 [Report]
>>16702208
Genuine question, how do Starship stans cope at this point in time?
Anonymous No.16702227 [Report]
>>16701787
>>16701790
COPV and SEETHE
Anonymous No.16702228 [Report] >>16702251
>>16702221
SLS chads I kneel. I am sorry I ever doubted you. At least you don't combust during a regular static fire test
Anonymous No.16702230 [Report]
>a tiny COPV tank explosion is enough to tear a hole through both propellant tanks
Bros maybe making the hull of a few millimeters of ultrathin steel wasn't a good idea
Anonymous No.16702232 [Report] >>16702236
SpaceX is currently doing a massive unintended experiment as the largest private company in the US and the future of US spaceflight. The experiment is to see how an operation breaks down if you have a system that ensures there is absolutely no institutional knowledge built up over longer than three months.
Anonymous No.16702235 [Report] >>16702240 >>16702241
>>16702219

I've worked graveyard. The workers and quality of work that late are -- suboptimal. Maybe someone who wasn't falling asleep or wired on go juice might have noticed the problem early enough to head it off.
Anonymous No.16702236 [Report]
>>16702232
SN-era SpaceX was incredibly based. 2025 SpaceX is incredibly cringe and incompetent
Anonymous No.16702238 [Report] >>16702243 >>16702253
I love how even the most pro SpaceX pro Elon Musk place on the entire internet is now calling out their failures and calling him an idiot, the world is healing.
Anonymous No.16702239 [Report] >>16702270
>>16702224
Weird that launchpad infrastructure is what is delaying the CZ-10 considering how fast China tends to build large scale infrastructure projects. The LM-10 was in development for such a long term, surely they had all the time in the world to develop the launchpad infrastructure years in advance?
Anonymous No.16702240 [Report]
>>16702235
Would they have known the COPV pressure was too much for it to handle without rupturing?
Anonymous No.16702241 [Report] >>16702260
>>16702235
noticed what? there is nothing to notice if this was some internal lamination
Anonymous No.16702243 [Report] >>16702247 >>16702248
>>16702238
1 mistake is fine
2 mistakes in a row is questionable
3 mistakes in a row is alarming
4 mistakes in a row someone isn't doing their fucking job properly. Musk can't just sweep this under the rug like he always does
Anonymous No.16702245 [Report] >>16702252
COPVs are gay anyway.
Make them out of stainless like the rest of the rocket and then you can have the beaners bang on them to their hearts content without breaking.
Dispensing with aerospace procedures and hyper caution is good m actually
Anonymous No.16702246 [Report] >>16702258
Guess I better start learning Mandarin.
Anonymous No.16702247 [Report] >>16702250
>>16702243
this is just not true at all
its a different problem every time
Anonymous No.16702248 [Report] >>16702256
>>16702243
>Musk can't just sweep this under the rug like he always does
Why? You're gonna make him?
Anonymous No.16702249 [Report]
>>16702208
>Elon Musk will finally learn that middle managers are absolute scum, worse than useless
tell me how I know he hasn't worked a single day in his life without saying anything.
Anonymous No.16702250 [Report] >>16702265
>>16702247
The problems have something in common. I know second order problem solving is difficult below a certain IQ threshold but please try to keep up.
Anonymous No.16702251 [Report]
>>16702228
having taxpayer cost-plus money helps a lot
Anonymous No.16702252 [Report] >>16702254 >>16702255 >>16702259 >>16702467
>>16702245
Anon, the COPV rupture breaking the steel propellant tanks is what caused the explosion.

SpaceX needs titanium.

Or tungsten.
Anonymous No.16702253 [Report]
>>16702238
Because he was in the perfect position to change things for the better but fucked it up spectacularly.
Anonymous No.16702254 [Report]
>>16702252
listen to me...

AD...
A...
MANT...
I-UM!
Anonymous No.16702255 [Report] >>16702262 >>16702264 >>16702278
>>16702252
>titanium
/sfg/ pick the color for your titanium starship
Anonymous No.16702256 [Report]
>>16702248
/sfg/ will make him. He lurks here and he folds like a deck of cards under peer pressure, we have seen it
Anonymous No.16702258 [Report]
>>16702246
Why?
Anonymous No.16702259 [Report]
>>16702252
Any rupture of a 300 atmosphere containing man sized pressure vessel is gonna break shit.
You need to prevent the rupture by making the vessel out of reliable material like stainless steel.
CF is unreliable if you don't handle it right.
Anonymous No.16702260 [Report] >>16702271 >>16702272
>>16702241

> SpaceX did nothing wrong! It was God's plan that tank exploded!

And now people are claiming perfect knowledge of the sensors and monitoring of a Starship subsystem, as well as Supply Chain qualification and inspection. And that no mistakes were made. As debris rains down across the Mexican Border.

The Cope.
Anonymous No.16702262 [Report]
>>16702255
Hmmm, I choose the brassy rose. Also this would be really fun if this ended up being a thing where we can choose the colors of our starships in the future
Anonymous No.16702264 [Report]
>>16702255
Green is my favorite color but purple metal is sexo. Reminds me of the Covenant from halo
Anonymous No.16702265 [Report] >>16702274 >>16702275
>>16702250
they don't other than your schizo EDS
they iterate, find new problems, fix those problems, new problems come up and so on
if it was the same problem you would have a point
but it isn't, so you don't
Anonymous No.16702269 [Report]
Elonbros fuck the titanium COPVs what if jusr make the aft of the ship titanium so it can't leak anymore
Anonymous No.16702270 [Report]
>>16702239
The wenchang construction teams (there are several, notably one under CALT, and another under the PLA) seem to hit some delays nowadays, the Hainan Commercial pads had a good year of delay and still faces infrastructure problem after their inaugural launches, there may be general problems with the teams there, also seaside construction in a jungle with regular typhoons may not be easy.

By contrast launch pads spring up like mushrooms in Jiuquan, Space Pioneer and Landspace's just got operational with two more in advanced construction, and CASC apparently started construction on a CZ-12/12A/12B (Zenit/F9 size) pad with the goal to finish it in only 5 months from groundbreaking; Haiyang (Shendong) is also quickly growing with 3 new "pads" (CZ-12A test infrastructure which according to a recent announcement will be reused for future launches, Space Epoch's and a new multipurpose sea launch platform) becoming operational since the start of the year.
Anonymous No.16702271 [Report]
>>16702260
There's a poster here that will insist nothing is wrong no matter how bad things get and if you start to convince him he'll accuse you of concern trolling
Mental illness level stuff. I think spaceflight might be his only source of personal hope in life
Anonymous No.16702272 [Report] >>16702285
>>16702260
moving the goalposts
the post I was replying to was whining about this test being done at night
doing it during the day would not have helped with the COPV issue in any way
Anonymous No.16702274 [Report] >>16702276
>>16702265

> New problems are good!

Is that really where you want to go with this?
Anonymous No.16702275 [Report] >>16702280
>>16702265
>if it was the same problem you would have a point but it isn't
Again, I understand second order problem solving can be difficult. Feel free to take some time to ponder before making your next post. I'm sure you'll get there with some supplemental time.
Anonymous No.16702276 [Report] >>16702281 >>16702282
>>16702274
new problems are inevitable
Anonymous No.16702278 [Report]
>>16702255
>CSGO knife Starship
Anonymous No.16702280 [Report] >>16702290
>>16702275
let me guess, its Elons fault (by either being there or not being there)
Anonymous No.16702281 [Report] >>16702282
>>16702276
No, actually, it is possible to build a rocket that eventually doesn't explode in unexpected ways every flight. This has been conclusively proven, actually.
Anonymous No.16702282 [Report] >>16702286
>>16702276
Wrong

>>16702281
Anonymous No.16702285 [Report] >>16702291
>>16702272

> m-m-moving the goal post!

Had to move. Because fiery debris from the most recent Starship explosion was raining down on us.
Anonymous No.16702286 [Report] >>16702293
>>16702282
if you never try anything new then I guess
Anonymous No.16702288 [Report]
Show me what a COPV made out of rosy titanium would look like. I know one of you tankwatching nerds can 3D model
Anonymous No.16702290 [Report]
>>16702280
>CEO not present
>no institutional knowledge maintained
>overworked employees
>waning morale
The only other possible reason is that there are fundamental problems with Starship itself, which is a premise I refuse to accept due to the implications that has for my own personal suicide
Anonymous No.16702291 [Report] >>16702300
>>16702285
disingenuous faggot
Anonymous No.16702293 [Report] >>16702308
>>16702286
>new
They've been attempting the same exact mission profile 4 times now, without even minor progress
Anonymous No.16702300 [Report]
>>16702291

> Stop making fun of my boyfriend! He just borrowed that money from me until his band gets signed!

And Elon fangirls hit bottom.
Anonymous No.16702302 [Report]
The funniest part is how it doesn’t get better, it just keeps getting worse
Anonymous No.16702305 [Report] >>16702309
Next time launch pad explosion
Anonymous No.16702306 [Report] >>16702327
Ahem...

> Four straight V2 failures in a row with disparate causes strongly suggests an institutional/procedural deficiency in current design verification and review processes and/or manufacturing oversight and acceptance testing. IMO if these aren't assessed and rectified then there is absolutely no reason to assume that V3 ship will proceed any more smoothly. This is a people/organizational problem, not a gadget problem.
Anonymous No.16702307 [Report] >>16702312 >>16702375 >>16702379
Maybe SpaceX should add a pusher plate to the ass of Starship, so it can use all these explosions to get to orbit like an orion drive
Anonymous No.16702308 [Report] >>16702318 >>16702329 >>16702608
>>16702293
are you pretending not to know or do you not actually know?
they are different problems
are you the person that insisted that SpaceX was lying about the root cause of Flight 8 being different from Flight 7?

a COPV exploding has absolutely nothing to do with leaks in the raptor engine and could have happened during any flight if this same design was used

for instance the COPV that caused the loss of AMOS-6 had been used multiple times before >>16701808, the only difference was that they loaded somewhat colder helium

https://web.archive.org/web/20170216160231/http://www.spacex.com/news/2016/09/01/anomaly-updates
> In the short term, this entails changing the COPV configuration to allow warmer temperature helium to be loaded, as well as returning helium loading operations to a prior flight proven configuration based on operations used in over 700 successful COPV loads. In the long term, SpaceX will implement design changes to the COPVs to prevent buckles altogether, which will allow for faster loading operations.

there will be no new problems if you never try anything new and this can be seen by looking at what the rest of the aerospace industry has achieved compared to SpaceX
Anonymous No.16702309 [Report]
>>16702305

Next time vehicles in the employee parking lot start randomly blowing up.
Anonymous No.16702312 [Report]
>>16702307
kek
Anonymous No.16702318 [Report] >>16702322 >>16702326
>>16702308

> there will be no new problems if you never try anything new and this can be seen by looking at what the rest of the aerospace industry has achieved compared to SpaceX!

I can take four consecutive flights on any airline and be reasonably confident I won't die from the plane exploding.

Can't say for Starship, can you?
Anonymous No.16702319 [Report]
fuck you.
Anonymous No.16702322 [Report] >>16702342
>>16702318
because starship is still under development
fucking retard
Anonymous No.16702326 [Report] >>16702346
>>16702318
Your mom can ride my cock four consecutive times and still claim she doesn't cheat on her husband. What's your point?
Anonymous No.16702327 [Report] >>16702330 >>16702332
>>16702306
Yep, see whole threads by former Starbase worker from last month
https://x.com/MorganWKhan/status/1922148207242666266
Anonymous No.16702329 [Report] >>16702736
>>16702308
and I mean even if you look at "legacy" aerospace manfucturers like ULA, they had an explosion during Centaur V testing and a SRB anomaly on flight 2 (that could have easily blown up the whole rocket if it failed slightly differently)
Anonymous No.16702330 [Report]
>>16702327
maybe its time to get rid of the tent era mexicans
Anonymous No.16702332 [Report]
>>16702327
>I've been told there is rocks, bolts, trash, and human waste inside these vehicles but have not been able to verify.
Anonymous No.16702336 [Report]
elon doesn't seem to give too much of a shit lmao
Anonymous No.16702342 [Report] >>16702357
>>16702322

> They're supposed to explode!

Can't think of any aircraft/space vehicle where the first four units all exploded sequentially. Maybe the V2, but that was 80 years ago during war time conditions.
Anonymous No.16702345 [Report] >>16702347 >>16702402
Anonymous No.16702346 [Report]
>>16702326
Well, she doesn't lie either, which makes you my father. Welcome back to life, I love you.
Anonymous No.16702347 [Report]
>carbon fiber is a good boi he don't do nuffin
>>16702345
Rolling starships to a separate place for testing was always retarded
Anonymous No.16702349 [Report] >>16702353
too many people itt have been rude to me for no reason
just put in a tip to CNN that the "rocket experts" in the spaceflight thread on 4chan's science board are helping Iran
fuck you
Anonymous No.16702353 [Report]
>>16702349
Anonymous No.16702357 [Report] >>16702364 >>16702818
>>16702342
The consequence of "moving fast and break things" is that things can and will break
Anonymous No.16702364 [Report] >>16702378 >>16702383
>>16702357
They are moving fast and breaking things without fixing any of the problems that caused them to break things. Get off Elon's dick, I beg you
Anonymous No.16702365 [Report]
how come iran can make icbm at less than 500k each but oldspace cant make an orbital rocket for less than a billion
Anonymous No.16702366 [Report] >>16702380 >>16702388 >>16702738
COPVs can't even be reused for that long without suffering damage apparently, why the fuck were they chosen for a reusable spacecraft anyway? Is SpaceX actually retarded?

https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/nesc/advances-in-understanding-copv-structural-life/
Anonymous No.16702375 [Report]
>>16702307
>under Imperial law, planets without crewed space travel at the time of assimilation into the Second Empire became colonies, governed by outworlders and at the mercy of the Imperial Traders Association; but planets with crewed space travel, even primitive space travel, became self-governing
>Back in Haven, Dougal's men used the acquired knowledge to build a primitive crewed spaceship, adopting a low-tech design of Robert Goddard—a rapid firing cannon using high-explosive shells detonating behind the ship to provide propulsion (but which might blow up the ship).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David%27s_Spaceship
Anonymous No.16702376 [Report] >>16702742
>if only you knew how carbon-fibered COPVs really are
Anonymous No.16702378 [Report] >>16702382
>>16702364

12 months until the first tankers for Mars 2026 have to start launching. Almost ready to go. Just a few more minor bugs to work out.
Anonymous No.16702379 [Report]
>>16702307
Why is it a plate? Wouldn't it be more efficient if it was a bell shape around the explosion? Otherwise wouldn't half the explosion just do literally nothing?
Anonymous No.16702380 [Report] >>16702386
>>16702366
I thought they werent using COPVs in the original design. must be another trash tier choice. Starship is beyond saving.
Anonymous No.16702382 [Report]
>>16702378
There will be an eleventh completely unrelated issue that causes S69 to explode during manufacturing
Anonymous No.16702383 [Report] >>16702387
>>16702364
they fix the problems that broke things but new things break
Anonymous No.16702386 [Report]
>>16702380
They were going to make the propellant tanks for ITS out of carbon fiber iirc but then they realized that is fucking retarded and stopped. Not sure why they didn't with the COPVs. With carbon fiber you lose
Anonymous No.16702387 [Report] >>16702394
>>16702383
How convenient
Anonymous No.16702388 [Report] >>16702392 >>16702399
>>16702366
probably just a temporary solution
changing COPVs between flights is not a big deal while you work on more pressing matters and SpaceX has a lot of experience with using them
Anonymous No.16702392 [Report]
>>16702388
>not a big deal
Except that time when it became a Massey's-sized deal
Anonymous No.16702394 [Report] >>16702397 >>16702408 >>16702413
>>16702387
this is the whole point of doing things quickly
so you can fix them quickly
instead of designing something for years for it to break anyway because reality is more complicated than the engineering model/simulation you used
Anonymous No.16702395 [Report] >>16702400
https://x.com/RyanHansenSpace/status/1935743922380104121
Anonymous No.16702397 [Report] >>16702409 >>16702462
>>16702394
>instead of designing something for years only for it to work perfectly on every launch
Anonymous No.16702399 [Report]
>>16702388

Blowing up another rocket and a critical testing facility seems kinda pressing. Makes you wonder what other spiders are hiding in the bedsheets.
Anonymous No.16702400 [Report]
>>16702395
They will stick with V2 Starship because they are obsessed with watching it fail and explode. Raptor 3 will come out in two more weeks (tm)
Anonymous No.16702402 [Report] >>16702415
>>16702345
Remember when this nig nog said it would be a year before another launch back when the concrete got messed up
Anonymous No.16702404 [Report] >>16702410 >>16702422 >>16702756
>Ctrl+F Angara
>no results
Seems like Elon's blunder stole Putin's thunder. First non-test payload for the Angara A5 Proton replacement launched last night.
Anonymous No.16702405 [Report] >>16702412 >>16702419
another example of oldspace development methods used is Blue Origin, yet their second stages keep imploding
doing things fast is good actually
problems tend to prop up whether you do hardware rich iterative development or not
Anonymous No.16702408 [Report]
>>16702394
they forgot the move fast part. its been well over a decade since the program began.
Anonymous No.16702409 [Report] >>16702420
>>16702397
such as?
Anonymous No.16702410 [Report]
>>16702404
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHJijS8_ywo
Anonymous No.16702412 [Report]
>>16702405
The real differentiator is whether you are hiring smart whites/asians, or oldspace boomers and pajeets. BO and SX both have the latter now
Anonymous No.16702413 [Report] >>16702420 >>16702421 >>16702423 >>16702473
>>16702394

Just worked, no failures and developed in less time than Starship is taking.
Anonymous No.16702415 [Report]
>>16702402
This time he is right though. There is no reason they shouldn't just adapt Starships to Pad A, at least for now. When have they ever needed to test a booster and ship at the exact same time? We are literally at least a couple YEARS away from that becoming a real problem
Anonymous No.16702419 [Report] >>16702424
>>16702405
fundamentally different issues though. New glenn is minmaxxed to fuck, which is why the second stages in real life conditions sometimes collapse. Its because its a mature design (in CAD) being pushed too far.
SpaceX on the other hands does shit on the fly and makes hundreds of retarded decisions which add up. Starship is FAR from minmaxxed. It's famously dozens of tonnes overweight and gets heavier with each change. Useable paylaod of 16t to leo shoiuld tell you there is a problem.
Anonymous No.16702420 [Report]
>>16702409
Chad SLS

Also Blue Origin's rocket, which while it has landing issues, can still make it to orbit on its first try, unlike Starshit

See:>>16702413
Anonymous No.16702421 [Report] >>16702427
>>16702413
to be fair there was a hell of a lot more money and manpower thrown at that beautiful rocket, and it was fully expendable, a bit smaller and a bit less powerful
Anonymous No.16702422 [Report]
>>16702404
We're waiting for the mission success confirmation and the high resolution footage that will come with it
Anonymous No.16702423 [Report] >>16702428 >>16702432 >>16702433 >>16702434
>>16702413
lol
Anonymous No.16702424 [Report]
>>16702419
They do things to reduce mass, which causes problems, which causes them to add solutions which ultimately add more mass than they started with. It is extremely funny, and it never stops happening
Anonymous No.16702427 [Report] >>16702488
>>16702421

> Fully expendable

So is Starship. It isn't supposed to be, but....
Anonymous No.16702428 [Report]
>>16702423
Anonymous No.16702432 [Report] >>16702436 >>16702450
>>16702423
>landed on the moon several times
>can't get to orbit without beyblading in LEO
Saturn V:1
Starship:0

Still exploded less times than Starship btw
Anonymous No.16702433 [Report]
>>16702423
not really comparable. one thing that the guys working on Saturn had was that a lot of them had come right through from the Redstone-Mercury days when they were blowing stuff up every week. all of that experience went into a project which had a really flexible budget and all the political support you could ask for. They did great work
Anonymous No.16702434 [Report]
>>16702423
Apollo 1 was more successful than Starshit
Anonymous No.16702436 [Report] >>16702439 >>16702446
>>16702432
again with the goalpost moving, what an absolute faggot
did Saturn 5 have problems or not? turns out it did
Anonymous No.16702438 [Report]
>IS THAT A MEXICAN IN A TENT? OH MY SCIENCE, AMBATU COMPOSITE-UNWRAP AAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK
Anonymous No.16702439 [Report] >>16702441
>>16702436
Starship can’t even open its door nigga
Anonymous No.16702440 [Report]
DOOR STUCK DOOR STUCK

I BEG YOU

PLEASE ;(
Anonymous No.16702441 [Report] >>16702442
>>16702439
faggot
Anonymous No.16702442 [Report]
>>16702441
You got one word in your repertoire there, buddy? You’re like a starship, a one-trick-pony (it only knows how to explode!)
Anonymous No.16702446 [Report] >>16702452
>>16702436

> Saturn had p-p-PUH-problems too!

Are you unfamiliar with the concept of proportionality?
Anonymous No.16702450 [Report]
>>16702432

Now SpaceX can't get out of the 210 Area Code without exploding. It's getting worse.
Anonymous No.16702452 [Report] >>16702454
>>16702446
I wasn't the one making the claims of a perfect program
Anonymous No.16702453 [Report] >>16702462
Saturn V is such a different vehicle from Starship that comparisons from either side dip into arguing from analogy. Stop it you two
Anonymous No.16702454 [Report] >>16702462
>>16702452

> Saturn V that blew up: Zero

Don't know why you think you're winning here.
Anonymous No.16702462 [Report]
>>16702454
did it work perfectly?>>16702397
no

>>16702453
didn't bring up Saturn 5 but you are right, Starship is a much more complicated program as well and has demonstrated things that Braun could only dream about (a booster reuse)
Anonymous No.16702466 [Report] >>16702471
can't wait for eager's follow up video!
Anonymous No.16702467 [Report]
>>16702252
COPV ruptured below the specs limit. So thats an issue. Not just for steel but also for any other material because every material has design stress limits, if they breach below the stress limits its not material property issue but design spec issue
Anonymous No.16702471 [Report]
>>16702466
Small PP
Anonymous No.16702473 [Report]
>>16702413
You may not like it but German engineers built that rocket
Anonymous No.16702485 [Report]
https://x.com/realhomerhickam/status/1935754918666629126
>If ever @SpaceX needed some love, it's now and I'm ready to give it to them. When I was sick, I got an amazing card from @elonmusk signed by dozens of his hard-working employees, not to mention tons of swag. I love you, @SpaceX. You are a great American company that has risked everything to make us a spacefaring country and world. God bless and keep you! Prodigious.
Anonymous No.16702487 [Report]
just send S37 without static fire
YOLO
Anonymous No.16702488 [Report] >>16702494
>>16702427
right and the booster catch is doing very well. turns out self landing reusable saturnV rockets is hard job.

im sure youve had this endlessly explained to you many times here but you keep spewing your bullshit over and over again. i wonder whats wrong with you.
Anonymous No.16702489 [Report] >>16702495 >>16702496 >>16702499 >>16702501
https://x.com/ashleevance/status/1935759765684338702
Anonymous No.16702494 [Report] >>16702497
>>16702488

> I'm just going to pretend the most recent booster also exploding in a fireball on return didn't happen. My cunning plan can not fail!

Please stop. You're making everyone sad.
Anonymous No.16702495 [Report]
>>16702489
A quick glance at the name and I assumed it was another concubine
Anonymous No.16702496 [Report]
>>16702489
'tis but a flesh wound
Anonymous No.16702497 [Report] >>16702502
>>16702494
EDS posters make everyone sad constantly
Anonymous No.16702498 [Report] >>16702500 >>16702523
>if you admit the rocket exploded you are not aligned with the cause
Anonymous No.16702499 [Report] >>16702502
>>16702489

> Letting the exploding rockets guy rewire your brain.

Thanks, but no thanks.
Anonymous No.16702500 [Report] >>16702505 >>16702506
>>16702498
if you constantly over and over again find yourself going on and on about the failures in a gleeful manner, you have lost the plot entirely.
Anonymous No.16702501 [Report] >>16702620
>>16702489
https://x.com/ashleevance/status/1935761212069102077

might be a video documentary? Ashlee has been doing those now, also started a podcast, I listened an episode with Palmer Luckey and it was pretty interesting
Anonymous No.16702502 [Report] >>16702514
>>16702499
This anon >>16702497 already did that. It seems to be working phenomenally. He is literally incapable of even thinking something negative about the starship program.
Anonymous No.16702505 [Report] >>16702514
>>16702500

> This isn't funny you guys! Stop right now!

We'll stop when Elon stops blowing stuff up like a defunct Vegas casino.
Anonymous No.16702506 [Report] >>16702514
>>16702500
You argue with anyone who declares there are fundamental problems at SpaceX or with Elon despite repeated explosions. If you've raised a man to godhood and refuse to discuss real implications for spaceflight then you've lost the plot.
Anonymous No.16702514 [Report] >>16702517 >>16702531
>>16702502
>incapable of even thinking something negative about the starship program.
not at all. i just dont feel the need to endlessly bitch about it while sounding happy and enjoying myself.

>>16702505
>>16702506
more EDS from the same guy. if you find yourself thinking of people who understand that sometimes things go boom as having 'raised a man to godhood' then you've had enough internet for this month.
Anonymous No.16702515 [Report]
Two V2 left, both of which will explode. Then on to blowing up the new and improved V3.
Anonymous No.16702517 [Report] >>16702530
>>16702514

> Things blow up all the time! It happens!
Anonymous No.16702523 [Report]
>>16702498
Wrong pic
Anonymous No.16702530 [Report] >>16702535
>>16702517
it must be so stressful for you being this unreasonable and obsessed. just try relaxing a bit and enjoying whats going on in the new space race. try not to think about elon so much too.
Anonymous No.16702531 [Report] >>16702541
>>16702514
Do you think the Starship program is going well? Is it going as well today as six months ago?
Anonymous No.16702535 [Report] >>16702541
>>16702530
>just don't talk about major events in spaceflight on this spaceflight forum
I see the problem now. You don't realize you can just turn the screen off
Anonymous No.16702541 [Report] >>16702547
>>16702531
it could definitely be going better but that goes for most programs. of course it would nice if each flight went perfectly but a few bad runs dont cause me much long term angst. theres other stuff going on, other launches to look forward to. i just cannot understand the endless focused seething generated by elon. you have elon on the brain. Acute Elonitis.

>>16702535
how you can think that applies to me is truly a mystery. im not the one going on and on and on about some problems in a particular program run by a particular space company.
Anonymous No.16702547 [Report] >>16702555
>>16702541

> it would nice if each flight went perfectly

Flight? Starship just blew up on the ground. The engine wasn't even firing. It was just sitting there trying to hold pressure and it exploded.
Anonymous No.16702555 [Report] >>16702562
>>16702547
yeah yeah ok anon. i know thats its completely impossible for you to be reasonable about this subject so theres no point carrying this on.

enjoy your quest to constantly and joyfully bitch about things, i hope it brings you much happiness and fulfillment. reddit thanks you for your service
Anonymous No.16702562 [Report] >>16702566
>>16702555
You have argued with at least three people this entire time. It's not the same guy. You're being enough of a freak that other people are jumping in. You've also been doing this for months so everyone fucking hates you now.
Anonymous No.16702566 [Report]
>>16702562
you are schizophrenic
Anonymous No.16702570 [Report]
>Scrap Version 2 of Starship
>Scrap Version 3 of Starship and Superheavy
>Scrap both pads, both Megabays all work at Florida
>Redesign the entire platform for 12m like God intended
>You now have plenty of room for engines and mass to add FIRE SUPPRESSION NITROGEN when your mexi-welds leak again
>Also keep space free in the top of the towers for hydrogen fueled upper stages
Anonymous No.16702571 [Report] >>16702660
>>16701504
>The Soviets figured this stuff out in the 70s...
Well.....
Anonymous No.16702577 [Report] >>16702595
How many more Starships do they have in the gigabay that are ready/close to ready for testing?

How long can they take to repair the static fire test site?
Anonymous No.16702581 [Report]
Hot take: everything is going to be alright.
Anonymous No.16702582 [Report]
>>16701120
It's more like throwing yourself at the ground and missing.
Anonymous No.16702583 [Report]
>>16701859
It's always the science projects isn't it? I really want all those things that help us figure stuff out, like the crater radio telescope on the moon, a giant gravitational wave detector, etc.
Anonymous No.16702586 [Report]
>>16702202
Sounds like your theory is infinitely adjustable and untestable
Anonymous No.16702587 [Report] >>16702589
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgvzo1EoaoI
>Episode 201 (with Casey Dreier and Eric Berger)

Anthony is joined by Casey Dreier, Chief of Space Policy at The Planetary Society, and Eric Berger, Senior Space Editor at Ars Technica, to talk about the NASA 2026 budget proposal, the Jared Isaacman saga, and all the space policy storylines you could imagine.
Anonymous No.16702589 [Report] >>16702592 >>16702772
>>16702587
https://spacenews.com/the-administrations-anti-consensus-mars-plan-will-fail/

casey wrote an opinion piece a few days ago
Anonymous No.16702592 [Report]
>>16702589
>The act of sending humans to Mars should reflect the best of ourselves, a projection of our ideals of cooperation, commitment, and tenacity. It should embrace scientific goals and build stronger alliances. It should serve a clear national interest. The 2026 budget plan does none of this. It is an act of sabotage and, ironically, of self-sabotage. Its legacy will not be boots on Mars, merely a lingering societal regret at throwing away so much, so quickly, to achieve so little.
Anonymous No.16702595 [Report] >>16702600
>>16702577
2 >>16701543
Anonymous No.16702598 [Report]
>>16700950 (OP)
Will they actually increase the cadence next year? Or will it be again ~5-6 launches?
Anonymous No.16702600 [Report]
>>16702595
the first block 3 ship is not expected to be finished until the end of the year but Masseys test site is also used for cryo testing of both boosters and Starships, not just static fires, so if some of that got damaged it might affect the development of block 3 as well >>16702131
Anonymous No.16702608 [Report] >>16702613
>>16702308
>a COPV exploding has absolutely nothing to do with leaks in the raptor engine
It means sloppy work
Anonymous No.16702612 [Report] >>16702628 >>16702629
>>16700950 (OP)
4 days until the First Look of the Vera Rubin Observatory.
Anonymous No.16702613 [Report]
>>16702608
maybe, or it could be something completely novel
Anonymous No.16702616 [Report] >>16702647
its crazy that spacex cant figure out a basic ass rocket. we're not asking for orion drives here.
Anonymous No.16702619 [Report]
>>16701695
I don't either but some spinning space stations would be cool
Anonymous No.16702620 [Report] >>16702624
>>16702501
She's pregnant
Anonymous No.16702621 [Report] >>16702648 >>16702695
>>16701750
Anonymous No.16702623 [Report] >>16702630
https://x.com/StarbaseTX/status/1935784373992714428
Anonymous No.16702624 [Report] >>16702665 >>16702668
>>16702620
its a dude
Anonymous No.16702625 [Report]
I wonder what this looks like in visible light. Red prominence's look really badass during eclipses.
Anonymous No.16702628 [Report] >>16702632
>>16702612
>wide field survey telescope
it will not produce pretty pictures! it will catalog billions of tiny dots barely moving or changing in brightness. valuable data but not something that makes you go aww
Anonymous No.16702629 [Report]
>>16702612
In the 5 coming years, I'll go /out/ as much as possible to do my milky way /p/hotography.
Anonymous No.16702630 [Report] >>16702654
>>16702623
Srarbase City will soon be a ghost town as the starship project winds down
Anonymous No.16702632 [Report]
>>16702628
it will find the ayys zooming around our neighborhood
Anonymous No.16702638 [Report]
How long until Falcon 9s start exploding
Anonymous No.16702647 [Report]
>>16702616
*basic ahh my fellow zoomer
ChatTDG !!Z0MA/4gprbd No.16702648 [Report] >>16702652
>>16702621

Add some vinegar and you got a salad bowl colony. Assume the oil is so the water does not boil off ...
Anonymous No.16702652 [Report]
>>16702648
human salad
Anonymous No.16702654 [Report] >>16702655
>>16702630
Scarbase
Anonymous No.16702655 [Report]
>>16702654
Saarbase
Anonymous No.16702660 [Report]
>>16702571
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RD-270
Anonymous No.16702665 [Report]
>>16702624
ok. well, he's pregnant. remember: it's 2025.
Anonymous No.16702668 [Report]
>>16702624
>A man named Ashlee
Americans are something else
Anonymous No.16702671 [Report] >>16702690 >>16702732
https://www.spacex.com/updates/#starship-static-fire-update
Anonymous No.16702679 [Report] >>16702682 >>16702688 >>16702757
https://x.com/booster_10/status/1935786283667771533
>Aerial view of Masseys test site after Ship 36 exploded during testing.
Anonymous No.16702682 [Report] >>16702684 >>16702722
>>16702679
I guess this is a screenshot from

https://www.youtube.com/live/Qy_VCU3xzeU

https://x.com/FelixSchlang/status/1935761531691532348
>Our photographer @Jordanguidry6 is in the air right now. We'll know more about the damage at SpaceX's Massey Test Facility shortly!

this guy is an annoying faggot but seems like this time they were first to take aerial pictures of the site
Anonymous No.16702684 [Report]
>>16702682
Anonymous No.16702686 [Report]
Kitten Space Agency in game, earth atmosphere now with ozone
Anonymous No.16702688 [Report]
>>16702679
Doesn't look that bad
Anonymous No.16702689 [Report]
Anonymous No.16702690 [Report] >>16702691 >>16702699
>>16702671
tldr: spics installed a damaged COPV and QA didn't give a damn
2 weeks
Anonymous No.16702691 [Report] >>16702716
>>16702690
Does ICE need to visit Starbase?
Anonymous No.16702693 [Report]
Anonymous No.16702694 [Report]
Anonymous No.16702695 [Report]
>>16702621
forced meme
Anonymous No.16702697 [Report]
Anonymous No.16702698 [Report]
Anonymous No.16702699 [Report]
>>16702690
no they didn't. it didn't explode. stop concern trolling. ship 36 will launch humans to mars tomorrow
Anonymous No.16702707 [Report]
TLDW; it did mostly nothing but the water tanks and nearby pipes got really, really fucking hot

Is the next V2 ship close to ready or is it fucked? How about V3 ships? Do we even have any in construction yet?
Anonymous No.16702709 [Report]
Anonymous No.16702712 [Report] >>16702718 >>16702726
https://x.com/mcrs987/status/1935801053712195754
Anonymous No.16702716 [Report]
>>16702691
Maybe
https://www.ice.gov/webform/ice-tip-form
Anonymous No.16702718 [Report] >>16702720
>>16702712
owari da
Anonymous No.16702720 [Report]
>>16702718
More like "not great, not terrible."
Anonymous No.16702722 [Report]
>>16702682
by this guy I mean the WAI host

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnOHpxHd1cg
Anonymous No.16702726 [Report]
>>16702712
>explosion rotated the Earth 30 degrees
It's never been more over
Anonymous No.16702729 [Report] >>16702733
lol
Anonymous No.16702732 [Report] >>16702738
>>16702671
How long have these fuckers been making COPVs for? Big sign the company is cooked.
Anonymous No.16702733 [Report]
>>16702729
go back, luke.
Anonymous No.16702736 [Report]
>>16702329
https://x.com/torybruno/status/1646572389193625600
>Outside of the test rig/ stand. Test article is inside (you can’t see it). Hydrogen leak. H2 accumulated inside the rig. Found an ignition source. Burned fast. Over pressure caved in our forward dome and damaged the rig.

from 2023
Anonymous No.16702737 [Report] >>16702741
Anonymous No.16702738 [Report] >>16702742
>>16702732
Carbon-fiber fucking sucks as a material long-term and has to be handled very carefully so it doesn't explode into spaghetti under pressure like a rope holding a ship at bay >>16702366
Anonymous No.16702741 [Report]
>>16702737
lol
Anonymous No.16702742 [Report]
>>16702738
>>16702376
Anonymous No.16702746 [Report] >>16702753
Raptor is cheap and starlink is printing money, but how much longer can SpaceX afford to sink money into Starship if it keep failing? If it's 2029 and it's still a coinflip if Starship makes it to orbit, when will it be time to pull the plug and start over?
Anonymous No.16702748 [Report] >>16702749
https://x.com/ycombinator/status/1935795261126889944

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFIlta1GkiE

new interview, mostly about AI
Anonymous No.16702749 [Report]
>>16702748
Anonymous No.16702752 [Report]
Anonymous No.16702753 [Report] >>16702758
>>16702746
>start over
Never and it doesn't make any financial sense to do that. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with Starship. Competent people would have taken her to orbit already. It's these boneheaded decisions, insufficient monitoring, and obsessions with mass savings that lead to the ship spiraling out of controlling and exploding when gently touched
Anonymous No.16702756 [Report]
>>16702404
>Putin's thunder
Nobody outside the odd person here watches Russian launches. They show nothing but 55 different angles of Angara clearing the tower then nothing.
And it's likely put it in the wrong orbit, again.
Anonymous No.16702757 [Report] >>16702759
>>16702679
https://x.com/FelixSchlang/status/1935816880624734666

better resolution
Anonymous No.16702758 [Report] >>16702764 >>16702767
>>16702753
Without the extreme mass savings, Starship looks to have a payload closer to the FH than the Saturn V. At that point you're looking at 30+ refueling trips for a Lunar/Mars mission...
Anonymous No.16702759 [Report]
>>16702757
that looks expensive
Anonymous No.16702764 [Report] >>16702766
>>16702758
You get a functioning overbuilt vehicle first and then iterate it down, just like they did with Falcon 9 except they are retarded now.
Anonymous No.16702766 [Report]
>>16702764
move fast and break things
Anonymous No.16702767 [Report] >>16702776 >>16702777
>>16702758
>payloadpayloadpayloadpayload
It's irrelevant. The fact that Starship can be refueled (and even refueled using another planet's resources one day at that) and 100% reused makes it have a literal infinite budget. As long as it can make it to space with 0.00000000000001kg of extra payload on board then the system works.
>30 refueling trips
Yes, and it takes about as long to do as refueling 3 ships if you actually start mass manufacturing swarms of ships to rendezvous instead of exploding one every month on earth. There's literally no risk, there is only 1 of these 30 ships that has people on it
Anonymous No.16702769 [Report]
Zeta Riticuli
Anonymous No.16702772 [Report]
>>16702589

> Trump's cuts to JPL's funding threatens the existence of life on Earth, says Casey, head of JPL's pep squad. Also, there are more than two genders, and Casey is at least three of them.
Anonymous No.16702773 [Report] >>16702782 >>16702833
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAcR7kqOb3o
>Orbital Data Centers Yes or No

new eager
Anonymous No.16702776 [Report] >>16702780 >>16702789
>>16702767
That's just silly. You can't just launch 30 rockets at once, I don't care how cheap they are.
Anonymous No.16702777 [Report] >>16702789
>>16702767

> Yes, I have never heard of the term incremental cost. And I do passionately believe that 1 nanogram of payload per launch works economically.
Anonymous No.16702780 [Report]
>>16702776
concern trolling
it will be fine
Anonymous No.16702782 [Report] >>16702816
>>16702773
so is it yes or no?
Anonymous No.16702787 [Report]
What are the most stylish looking page catalogs for celestial objects?
Anonymous No.16702789 [Report] >>16702797
>>16702776
Anon, in Musk's official starship plan, 1,000 starships are sent to Mars at once. If 1,000 ships at the same time is expected, then 30 at the same time is not that weird

>>16702777
At least in the beginning, a little bit of fuel is literally the payload. Any amount of payload is payload, you just need to build more ships. Additionally, nobody has even built a payload that Starship can use. For reference, even Falcon Heavy gets jack shit to do, and even then the only reason it is used is typically for special orbits, NOT because the payload is heavier
>BUT MUH STARLINKS
Starlink 2.0 minis have kept the company running so far, and I can assure you no matter how underwhelming of an amount of Starlinks a heavy beefed up Starship will carry, literally no other company will have as many laser links in 100 YEARS as SpaceX has in orbit today.
Anonymous No.16702797 [Report]
>>16702789

> Any amount of payload is payload, you just need to build more ships.

Just highlighting that. If you completely ignore the cost of getting payload to orbit, marginal and amortized overhead, the numbers work.
Anonymous No.16702799 [Report] >>16702800 >>16702802 >>16702815
https://x.com/FelixSchlang/status/1935823701183795667
Anonymous No.16702800 [Report]
>>16702799
We will rebuild
Anonymous No.16702802 [Report] >>16702805
>>16702799
Just adapt the main pads at Starbase for Starship. SpaceX is retarded
Anonymous No.16702805 [Report] >>16702811
>>16702802
and what if there is a problem like this there? one of the reasons these are far away from the actual orbital launch pads is so the systems there don't get fucked up
massively bigger tank farms, tower systems and so on
Anonymous No.16702811 [Report] >>16702820
>>16702805
>what if there is a problem like this there.
That place could tank Hiroshima if it really wanted. The tanks are low, far, and behind several meters of reinforced concrete ramps. The pad itself is bolted by steel and concrete deep underground, practically the whole top 15 meters of the ground there is completely artificial and bolted to the earth. The piping and connectors are hidden under literal blast doors. The tower itself would shred an airliner like a cheese grater with hardly a scratch.

If Starship exploded on Pad A or Pad B, the holddown clamps would be gigafucked, but that's just about the only thing, and those are replaceable. Reminder this whole thing is designed to survive a whole fully fueled superheavy and starship detonating without ending the program
Anonymous No.16702814 [Report]
>>16701891
Designing a spaceship is a massive undertaking that goes way beyond just sketching a cool concept. It involves thousands of engineers, scientists, and specialists working together to tackle insane challenges—propulsion systems, life support, structural integrity, thermal protection, and more. Each part has to be tested to the extreme, and even then, failures like explosions can happen. I can provide insights, analyze data, or suggest ideas, but the actual design? That’s a human team effort, with people like those at SpaceX iterating through trial and error to push the boundaries. Respect to them for keeping at it despite setbacks.
Anonymous No.16702815 [Report]
>>16702799
All things considered, i was afraid the tank farms would be damaged, but they look okay for the most part other than the charring. Even the two container offices look to be fine aside from charring. There's probably some smaller damages to metal pipings but Im not expecting much damage tbqh. The main damage is the stand itself, atleast the top part of the stand.
ChatTDG !!Z0MA/4gprbd No.16702816 [Report]
>>16702782

Depends on delay.
Anonymous No.16702818 [Report]
>>16702357
"Moving fast" doesn't help when it's just running in circles with your ass on fire.
Anonymous No.16702820 [Report]
>>16702811
Also, you don't really need to risk them at all if you think about it. You can just cover the clamps with the adapter ring that connects starship to Pad A, that way the adapter takes the brunt of the damage instead of the complex clamps. Just don't use the clamps at all. Starship doesn't have very many engines for them to be necessary, as shown by the test stands
Anonymous No.16702821 [Report] >>16702826 >>16702830
Watching a lot of Scott Manley and wow does he have a hate boner for China. Like he's one of those reddit types that tries to be non-political and delivers news and info in a neutral way, but he's always throwing in some subtle and non-subtle jabs at chinese space news whenever he talks about them. In some extremely petty ways too.
Anonymous No.16702826 [Report] >>16702828
>>16702821
He's a reddit lefty and you can tell from his deliveries on all things SpaceX. He can't help it, he's human after all.
Anonymous No.16702828 [Report]
>>16702826
The Reddit left loves China though
Anonymous No.16702829 [Report] >>16702834
Is it the V2 rapture engines that is causing all these failures lately? If so why do they not scrap them and avoid all the disastrous PR? They clearly don't work and the V3s are different and already being made, so just scrap them instead of using them up for the sake of using them.
Anonymous No.16702830 [Report] >>16702832
>>16702821
Maybe don't drop your rockets filled with the most toxic propellants known to man on inhabited villages if you don't want people to talk shit about you?
Anonymous No.16702832 [Report]
>>16702830
He shits on their attempts to solve this issues though
Anonymous No.16702833 [Report]
>>16702773
Anonymous No.16702834 [Report] >>16702835
>>16702829
No, thermal cycling of the composites of a nitrogen COPV mad it microtear then inevitably rupture and the intense pressure blew a gaping that connected the LOX and methane tanks together so the fuels mised. A little bit of ignition and the whole thing detonated instantly
Anonymous No.16702835 [Report]
>>16702834
Full of typos but you get the idea