>>16702696
I'm not against codifying results or reading.
>no offloading things
When did I say that?
Very bad faith.
Every offload has a cost. Don't pretend they don't. Sometimes the gain is worth it. Other times it is not. Sometimes the cost is hidden/delayed.
>>16702653
Anon's mind is poisoned. He can only reason in shill fragments. Many such cases.
The scary thing about the AI trend is it is replacing the reasoning, not just data storage/fetch.
Most shitty software kinda exemplifies the cost already. We have codemonkeys using copy/paste incorporating flawed code into their own shit. It was happening before AI with stackexchange and github. There are also spooks/hackers putting out flawed code in the hopes that lazy retards will opt for the easy copy/paste option. Nobody would build flaws into AI though.
Most domestication relies on providing an easier option that seems to give equal or better quality of life in the short term.
The long term cost is usually cultural or genetic atrophy and some form of enslavement.
Have fun fighting over who gets the privilege to be the house negros.