Anonymous
6/19/2025, 9:01:12 PM No.16702557
2+2=5
Replies:
Thread 16702557 - /sci/ [Archived: 784 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/19/2025, 9:13:32 PM No.16702569
>>16702557 (OP)
quick mafhs
quick mafhs
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:09:05 AM No.16702841
>>16702557 (OP)
cool it with the pro semitism
cool it with the pro semitism
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 12:46:40 PM No.16704126
>>16702557 (OP)
no it doesnt.... idoit
no it doesnt.... idoit
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 2:08:49 PM No.16704213
>>16702557 (OP)
If we define Succ(Succ(Succ(Succ(0))) as 5, then sure.
If we define Succ(Succ(Succ(Succ(0))) as 5, then sure.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 3:56:32 PM No.16704301
Anonymous
6/21/2025, 7:13:11 PM No.16704425
>>16704059
There is a conceptual frame here, so he is wrong in his abstract case, because the fundamental root of an n-dimension is the n-dimensional point and because of telic recursion the precession of some moment of flux is 'bilateral.' So the general case is not 1x1 = 2 but a unit interaction is not reducible to 1.
There is a conceptual frame here, so he is wrong in his abstract case, because the fundamental root of an n-dimension is the n-dimensional point and because of telic recursion the precession of some moment of flux is 'bilateral.' So the general case is not 1x1 = 2 but a unit interaction is not reducible to 1.
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 12:38:13 AM No.16704670
>>16702557 (OP)
It's wild to me when people who are intelligent think so much and come full circle to what does 2+2 equal
It's wild to me when people who are intelligent think so much and come full circle to what does 2+2 equal