Why do dogs have to die, scientifically speaking?

So we can find out about insulin.

>>16702565 (OP)
Better question is, why the fuck do we not have a complete biologicial encyclopedia of the aging process? This shit should've been solved 20 years ago

>>16702565 (OP)
if we don't let him torture dogs, he will torture humans
https://odysee.com/@Realfake_Newsource:9/RFNS-10.21-003-020:3

>>16702565 (OP)
You didn't work on an eternal life mechanism? :(

>>16702565 (OP)
If they didn't, they'd just keep reproducing until the earth's surface is nothing but a roiling sea of dogflesh.

Why are they alive in the first place?

>>16702634
True. You’d think old age would be the first thing humanity would race to solve since the advent of the Scientific Method

Because you didn't feed them fortified Apigenin.

>>16702760
They didn't eat the rat poison grandpa left out for them.

>>16702775
Can we talk about this? Why haven't we cured ageing yet.

>>16703014
One of the problems may be that we are actively designed to age and die by our biology. If human beings didn't and were biologically immortal then you'd have a population dominated by postmenopausal women and men who had already reproduced who knows how many times (therefore limiting the gene pool) and who now have declining sperm quality. You may also have biological features that kill us early but give us an advantage in our reproductive years so they're still spread.
Imagine, say, a trait that increases your chances of getting lung cancer and makes it more aggressive once you hit your 60s and beyond, but in exchange it means you can absorb more oxygen and use it more efficiently. This means making you slightly smarter and stronger, improving your general health, making you hold your breath longer, etc. Even though this kills you quicker it would still be an advantageous trait and get passed down because it would still be beneficial throughout a woman's reproductive years and through a male's primary reproductive years. It's not impossible that human biology has countless little traits like that

>>16702760
Humans creating dogs was a huge mistake. There are only very few actually useful dogs living today, guide dogs, sniffing dogs, search and rescue dogs, and not much else.

https://youtu.be/DrFa8MHjZvY&t=407

>>16703497
Looks like the video had to be reuploaded.

https://youtu.be/ib-D1EelH4Y&t=411

>>16702565 (OP)
because god said they do

Because the world is a Corrupted hell unlike Eru intended for us in the music and now dogs get to join him sooner

>>16702565 (OP)
Planned obsolescence. Breeders could increase their lifespan, but won't because they want you to come back and buy another.

>>16703765
I don't like this god guy. Allows faggots to exist. Makes my life shit. He kills the puppers.

>>16702565 (OP)
>telomere shortening
>DNA damage accumulation
>epigenetic damage accumulation
>protein misfolding
>accumulation of senescent cells
>reduction of immune function?
>base level inflammation
And probably other things I forgot.

>>16703896
Dogs are a bigger problem than you can even imagine. They aren’t just a source of noise or a potential attack.

>>16702565 (OP)
So that humans can know sadness and loss.

>>16704626
Wtf I love dogs now