There is no argument against "Race science" (or really, what it really is, evolutionary biology in humans.) That isn't just bad faith skirting around the topic of actual biology, evolution and genetics, and instead just arguing that 19th century race science had incorrect classification of "races".
I've read tonnes of responses of scientists "debunking race science" and all of them are just engaging in bullshit semantics and don't actually address the data sets or medical/biological realities, that their own data shows. It's "Yeah Blacks don't exist, there are Bantu, Zulu, Kongo, Igbo etc" yeah.. what's the point here? That people in the 19th century had an incomplete take on science? Wow. Gravity ain't real because people were wrong about how it functioned before Einstein.
Can anyone explain, why Humans would not function biologically like ANY OTHER ANIMAL?
>Reminder that drift between genome in ethnicites, would result in on average, up to 12 other species, in ANY OTHER ANIMAL.
I havent seen that image since 2018. Really takes you back.
Yes itโs well known that academics were captured by fellow travelers after ww1. Thatโs why a trumps attack of the university is a good thing and he isnโt going far enough.
He needs to make sure they are poor and broken while he replaces them with non communist.
>>16703183 (OP)What exactly are the scientific claims and scientific achievements of this "race science"?
>>16703277the recognition that races of humans exist and we aren't all the same.
This is somehow a controversial position in the face of the long running leftard takeover of academia and their obsession with equiality.
>>16703332Cut the bullshit political posturing and give me a proper answer.
>races of humans existWhat is the meaning of this statement? Can you test for race in humans?
>we aren't all the same.Who ever claimed that?
Genes aren't real buddy. Show me a gene RIGHT MEOW
>>16703338I don't understand your confusion I simplified it as far as I possibly could to the bare tenets, ignoring the political hand in the suppression of this field would be ridiculous.
Are you planning to deny the outright denial of racual differences such as those oh so hilarious quotes that any difference in outcomes between say white and black is purely a result of discrimination?
>>16703338That different subspecies of specialized human groups exist.
>Can you test for race in humans?Yes, quite easily through genetics, xrays, blood tests. In fact, racial groups are extremely important for medical science. Sickle Cell Anemia, Marrow transfusions etc
>Who ever claimed that?reddit/r/EverythingScience/comments/1jyxgdb/scientific_consensus_shows_race_is_a_human/
reddit/r/EverythingScience/comments/1jyxgdb/scientific_consensus_shows_race_is_a_human/
>>16703442potential for an intersting thread
i'm just a science tourist, any opinions on this?
would like to know if it's something to be taken seriously, and if so, what is it showing, exactly?
(beuyonf what's written)
>>16703332>the recognition that races of humans exist and we aren't all the same.Say its officially recignized that homo sapiens is actually 12 species, and they get given the official latin name
What then?
>>16703742>What then?We have to pick the names obviously.
>>16703749this is retarded by ur logic all the things that swim in the ocean should just be called fish
>>16703338AI can tell the race of a person by looking at their bones.
>>16703780I'm not following the logic of this conversation.
>what if there are 12 species?>we pick names>and?>everything is the ocean is a fishLol what
>>16704675AI can tell the race of a person by looking at a heart monitor read out