Thread 16709826

is a tordao a "defeatable" natural disaster? lke if you shot a super strong gust of wind at the nado and knocked it over / blow it away would it stop

>>16709826 (OP)
Do you post in any other threads here, perchance?

>>16709826 (OP)
>super strong gust of wind
you mean like the gust of wind created a nuclear explosion?

apparently we could do it pretty easily

Could a nuke destroy a tornado? I feel like it must be able to

>>16709836
>planetary crust

dbz predicted the future of home architecture

Idk why we haven't built these in tornado prone areas yet but eventually we will

>>16709836
>easily

>swarms of drones constantly scanning every wooded area for discarded lit cigarettes
>orbital fire sprinklers
>global terrain reshaping
>force fields
>energy diffusing sea domes
>high atmosphere vortex disruptors
>ocean temperature modulation
>planetary-scale wind manipulation
>magma pressure regulators
>core convection dampening
>full atmospheric temperature regulation
>planetary-scale weather balancing
>climate-stabilizing exostructures
>global cloud factories
>real time tectonic stress release
>planetary crust management systems

They told me AI was going to get smarter over time.

>>16709880
In the same way that a shotgun blast to the face will fix your stuffy nose.

>>16709836
It's curious how people are believing in more and more actual science fiction that won't be possible for thousands of years if ever.

We could drop giant domes onto the tornados from above, trapping them inside the dome until their energy runs out.

>>16709902
>>16709916
i don't think it's that far fetched, the military has technology that's well beyond what we're currently aware of. I'm pretty sure some of the most advanced tech we have now is stuff from like the 1980s in a war

>>16709830
or a lot of small gusts of wind like many people firing automatic weapons at the tornado

>>16709892
The percentage of buildings in tornado prone areas that are actually damaged by tornadoes is extremely small. That's why we don't massively increase the expense of building to address a low probability event but we do have many small increases in cost that are more in line with the risk. Things like strapping down mobile homes to ground anchors (good for wind in general, not just tornadoes) and securing trusses to resist lift are worth the cost. Making everything out of concrete is far out of line with the risk.

>>16709826 (OP)
A large array of wind turbines is said to kill hurricanes. That was posted after Katrina levelled New Orleans.

>>16711778
so ur saying the whole coast becomes....a Hadrian's wall of turbines....lets say 60 miles inlet?

>>16711867
That, and probably even bigger. Essentially this guy (a professor, I think) wanted to fill the entire Gulf with wind turbines. At the time, that would have been 5 MW turbines, now people are designing 40 MW turbines, so you might divide by 8.

>>16709826 (OP)
>tordao
ten thousand days since a properly spelled OP was posted here. if misspellings like this do not jump out from the text for you, it means you haven't read enough in your life to be worthy of my attention. get lost.

>>16709892
Tornado prone areas also have heat and frost to worry about, so they usually just invert and bury structures like that instead of building them up.

>>16709836
Sure, just let me look for some of my orbital mirrors