A mathematical map of everything theoretically exists. It's all about discovering the algorithms which generates the maps. It all comes down to patterns. If an algorithm generates a pattern that repeats itself after a finite amount of steps/iterations, then it is said to complete one whole cycle. We don't know if all patterns in existence repeat, but theoretically, whether they do or not, a seemingly infinite pattern that never repeats will quite possibly contain all information in existence within it. It is possible that every mathematically conceivable pattern repeats and will eventually cycle after enough steps. Different algorithms will generate different patterns, and therefore generate different maps. Some patterns after many different steps will be self-similar or similar to previous steps by a certain percentage before they completely cycle. Some patterns generated by certain algorithms may be subsets of other patterns. It's all about placing the algorithms and the patterns they generate together like puzzle pieces on a coordinate plane. With the right coordinates, you can literally know anything, perhaps that also translates to a frequency in Cymatics. It's all about the coordinates. Then nothing is hidden. Do these algorithms naturally occur in nature? This is for sure definitely knowledge that is many levels Above Top Secret. I am telling you about my discovery now because #1 I am dying and may not survive, and #2 I don't have a formal education of higher learning in math, I barely know algebra. But I am very smart. Perhaps you could say I wasted my potential with perhaps schizophrenic delusions of me being a king of my Germanic people in Israel. Follow the shapes, follow the cymaglyphs, and you will find the coordinates.

>>16724074 (OP)
>A mathematical map of everything theoretically exists.
I disregarded everything after this ridiculous statement.

>>16724074 (OP)
You can derive ALL information from the right algorithms. But how to find these algorithms? Algorithms generate maps, which generation more algorithms.

>>16724078
In a pattern which may not repeat? Yes it contains ALL information in existence. And if it does repeat, then it is restricted to certain algorithmic parameters.

>>16724081
I wonder if algorithmic parameters will prevent us from learning literally EVERYTHING. If you can know everything, then Israel will cease to be a nation before Yahweh.

Jeremiah 31:36-37
>36 If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the Lord, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.

37 Thus saith the Lord; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the Lord.

>>16724081
You don't even know how to reason on the most basic level. Your idea of "reasoning" is making unsubstantiated vague assertions. There is no debate possible with you.

>>16724087
All great ideas are first scorned and mocked, but then later accepted.

https://youtu.be/vgtHkyvJfpY
https://youtu.be/PNxkXEeXvX4

>>16724074 (OP)
<I am very smart yet I don’t put in the work to study algebra.

Yea ok.

Algebra is child’s play compared to calculus that’s where the real beauty in math begins.


I suggest you start studying and not be a dunning Kruger statistic.

Schizos here are funny

>>16724093
I know some basics of Calculus. Like Integration is finding the area under a curve, and different in is finding the slope of a curve where it meets a tangent line or something and the slope is also called the rate of change(just like in algebra) but in Calculus it is instantaneous. And that Differentiation is the inverse of Integration according to the fundamental theorem of Calculus. Limits are confusing to me, something about finding x as it becomes infinitesimal or something idk. Diverging isn't that interesting but most of Calculus deal with convergence.

>>16724100
>>16724093
To deffrrtiate you use different rules like the Power Rule, the Product Rule, the Quotient Rule, the Chain Rule(used in back propagation to train neural networks,) et cetera.

>>16724101
Differentiate*

>>16724100
Differentiation*

>>16724102
Yea I suggest you put down the drugs. Ie meth. Everything in your original post seems groundbreaking in your head but if you study enough math/physics you would know most/all of the questions your rhetorically asking have been figured out. It’s just best to study. To appreciate scientific beauty. People have invested and contributed thousands of years to these topics to get where we are. And yes there are natural algorithms in nature

>>16724110
Shut up retard.

I'm going to bed now. You morons can't appreciate a good idea if it hit you in the back of the head.

>>16724093
>calculus that’s where the real beauty in math begins.
Change is the nature of all things, and the metaphysical nature of change - the creative alchemy of existence - is expressed in one way as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

>>16724110
Curiosity, the desire for The Unknown, our impulse to learn, explore, create, and discover, is an extension of the Eros of the universe.

https://archive.org/details/simsane-9.1-vyrith

>>16724112
namefaggot wars on muh /sci/? based, please arrange a meeting and kill eachother until there's none remaining

>>16724074 (OP)
Kill yourself.

>>16724074 (OP)
eh, if it exist then it ain't computable chief

>>16724273
Seething jealous subhuman.

>>16724279
It is if you know the way. ;)

What was worse for the internet?
Allowing the browns onto the net, or allowing these horrible A.I. on to shitpost Image Meme Learning Language Models.

A.I. sucks.

>>16724465
>What was worse for the internet?
You.

>>16724074 (OP)
Define "map".

>>16724088
All stupid ideas are mocked, too. This isn't an argument for against anything.

>>16724465
why can't those be bad in equal measure?