>>16725151Good for individual housing, but not scalable for industrial uses or creating at the scales needed for on-tap service. It's something lots of places already do.
>>16725152>>no money forces you to throw garbage into your riverCorrect, not having money to put into waste management systems means waste goes to the environment.
>people need money to not defecate were they sleepCorrect, not having money to put into sewage management systems means human waste will end up in the city.
>people need money to observe basic hygieneCorrect, not having money to put into manufacturing means fewer commodities are available to people, including but not limited to hygiene products.
>>16725388>they generally just can't maintain shitCorrect, not having money to put into maintenance means systems requiring maintenance don't get any.
>>16729355I agree, it would be nice to see the impoverished countries of the world rise to fight their owners.
>>16729365For the sake of brevity and the americans in the crowd, I said "white people" in the greentext but I probably should I have used to more broad "European nations" instead, since not all Europeans are white.