How would higher education look like if we didn't let women in?

>>16724956 (OP)
full of homosexuals I pressume

less indebted

>>16724956 (OP)
Probably quite a bit younger and more brilliant because birthrates would obviously be far higher.

>>16724956 (OP)
Don't give the gays any more ideas

>>16725040
>>16724957
>muh seggs
What about education you raging faggots?

>>16725050
>What about education
It would be like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece

>>16725106
>he believes in the LGBTQA+ retcon of ancient greece

>>16724956 (OP)
Functioning institution instead of the gossiping kindergarten we have today. Female professors aren’t the main problem; it’s the admin.

>>16724957
>full of homosexuals I pressume

>>16725124
So administrative bloat is really just what happens women get into education?
God that's so depressing but explains a lot.

>>16725147
Not entirely, but they’re a symptom of it. It’s like with every other corporate environment. Professors will argue with admin over having chalkboards instead of shitty whiteboards because the latter is cheaper, meanwhile admin has a horde of Karens responsible for shit like female-exclusive scholarships, DEI, “outreach” (getting paid to spam emails), useless “entertainment” and “engagement” programs for undergrad Stacies, blah-blah-blah.

>>16725166
>Stacies have to be entertained to study
Who the fuck cares? If you don't want the degree drop out retard, nobody is forcing you, it's not like you understand any of what's taught to you anyways

>>16725168
How long will it take you to pay off your student debt?

>>16724956 (OP)
Less retarded, same amount of corruption.

>>16725168
You clearly haven’t been to college. 90% of undergrads go for the “experience” just to graduate with a mediocre GPA and get the coveted piece of paper with their name on it. Culling these retards obviously makes for a poor business model. And US colleges are businesses first and foremost.
>degree drop out
That again is a poor business model. The admin literally designs courses so that it’s impossible for students to fail and profs are told to comply. I constantly got comments from my TA supervisors about my “harsh” grading, which is a codeword for “you should never grade below a C as long as the assignment was submitted”. There’s also the amazing “student feedback” where a professor’s career may get stalled because he wants to make the course actually challenging and worth a damn. The students just bitch to admin about it and give him low scores on those feedback forms.

>>16725174
0, I am european

>>16725185ooof>>16725174

>>16725182
Sounds like a problem that would heavily improve if we barred women from entry, or if you had admission exams
Also there's no fucking way there'd prostests for palestine if women werent shoehorned into universities

>>16725190
It’s not a bug. It’s a feature.

>>16724956 (OP)
there's a woman in your pic thoughbeit

>>16725211
Spousal hire before it was made official.

why would you not let women in? that would reduce academic output, not that much but it would still be reduced. if your only goal is to increase worthy academic output just make it hard to get into a good university and create a national stigma against low tier university graduates like in china where if you didnt graduated from peking or tsinghua you are worthless. your post should be "how would higher education look if we didn't let the business of universities be a thing?" in that case society would be really competitive, academic output would be meaningful, and being a graduate would mean something important. that would also mean we'd have mit, standford, harvard scholarships or graduates lurking on this board instead of the arrogant stem graduates from unknown university calling everyone retards for questioning something.

>>16725280
>that would reduce academic output
what would increase academic output more - women in academia, or women breeding more potential academics?

>>16725280
i think downstream you would be barring people from higher income jobs, which in turn reduces overall consumption and blah blah blah, the economic situation is just too fragile for such a change

>>16725280
>that would reduce academic output
replication crisis

>le girls are le silly
I thought this was a high iq board

>fails to notice Curie

>>16724956 (OP)
Where's Lise Meitner in that photo?

>>16725218
Curie gets a pass because she worked on radioactivity before the full effects of radioactivity on the human body were well known.

>>16725428
>>16725540
Right, radiation fried her ovaries (the organ that makes foids stupid)

>>16725371
>>le girls are le silly
Nigga that's a scientific truth

>>16725371
many do are. not all tho

>>16725540
>she gets a pass because she was a lab rat
PhD student tier shit

>>16724956 (OP)
Well, women sneak in anyway

>>16724956 (OP)
>How would higher education look if we didn't let women in?
Or
>What would higher education look like if we didn't let women in?
It would look like either of those. Not what you wrote.

>>>/pol/510576423