>>16730174
Alright, I'll explain this real quick:
>you throw away traditional knowledge
No. "Traditional knowledge" gets investigated. Hell, the existence of tradition and folklore is very often used as a launchpad for serious research, just not in a "let's take this story at face value" sort of way.
>Yet you encourage religious thinking via many worlds
Interpretations of QM are explicitly understood to be speculative. Nobody's saying they're absolute fact. He'll, the first interpretation you'll learn in any formal education setting is Copenhagen, not many worlds, largely because it's basically the "shut the fuck up and do the math" version. You won't find many serious researchers dogmatically holding to many worlds.
You appear to read too much popsci. People who actually "do science" are well aware of the line between speculation and evidence-based conclusions.
>government as the sole authority in your life
>giving all your money to the government.
Science has fuckall to do with that.