It's completely over for science isn't it. Have people finally woken up?

>>16730154 (OP)
only chuds get mad that some dinosaurs had feathers
im not even sure why, thats like getting mad that bears have different colored fur
it is what it is

>>16730169
The point is that you throw away traditional knowledge (only that which you dislike) because of (lack of evidence). Yet you encourage religious thinking via many worlds (and other unprovable statements that don't contradict the government as the sole authority in your life) under the guise of scientisim and giving all your money to the government.

>>16730154 (OP)
I’ve never believed soientists about any of the nonsense they claim when their proof lies inside of a rock they claim belonged to animals from 40 million years ago. Keep in mind, some of those “scientists” still have their relatives openly shitting in streets and beaches.

this makes chuds shit and piss themselves

>NOOOOO THEY AREN'T ANIMALS THEY'RE MOVIE MONSTERS
grow up

>>16730174
>I'm too stupid to understand it so it must be wrong

>>16730174
Oh, so you're just retarded. Cool.
Thanks for sharing.

what the fuck are you trannies even pretending to be talking about

>>16730174
Alright, I'll explain this real quick:

>you throw away traditional knowledge
No. "Traditional knowledge" gets investigated. Hell, the existence of tradition and folklore is very often used as a launchpad for serious research, just not in a "let's take this story at face value" sort of way.

>Yet you encourage religious thinking via many worlds
Interpretations of QM are explicitly understood to be speculative. Nobody's saying they're absolute fact. He'll, the first interpretation you'll learn in any formal education setting is Copenhagen, not many worlds, largely because it's basically the "shut the fuck up and do the math" version. You won't find many serious researchers dogmatically holding to many worlds.
You appear to read too much popsci. People who actually "do science" are well aware of the line between speculation and evidence-based conclusions.

>government as the sole authority in your life
>giving all your money to the government.
Science has fuckall to do with that.

im BEGGING you people to get back to /pol/. by being here you're not convincing anyone who's not already retarded

>>16730321
>implying /sci/ is less retarded than /pol/
you realize you're on the internet, right? everyone's retarded here. smart people read books.

>>16730174
>Yet you encourage religious thinking via many world
Many worlds is cope for Copenhagen being just as magical and nonsensical. But hey! If it works it works

>>16730186
how big is that fossil?

>>16730154 (OP)
What if "Magic" was just banned Science of the past?

Such as Hormone therapy and natural medicines?

>>16730846
magic was probably people getting lucky with chemistry and calling it alchemy. maybe also some minor electrical trinket
also drugs. google "flying potion"

>>16730186
chud here, it's true, I just sharted when I saw this

>>16730978
>Bartolommeo's second account is more suggestive and points toward another element in the witches' 'flights'.
>It concerns a certain notary of Lugano who, unable to find his wife one morning, searched for her all over their estate and finally discovered her lying deeply unconscious, naked and dirty with her vagina exposed, in a corner of the pigsty.
>The notary 'immediately understood that she was a witch' (!) and at first wanted to kill her on the spot, but, thinking better of such rashness, waited until she recovered from her stupor, in order to question her.
> Terrified by his wrath, the poor woman fell to her knees and confessed that during the night she had 'been on a journey'.

>>16730846
>>16730978
"Magic" in antiquity was literally just science practiced by a priest-class that was hidden from non-initiates.

Math was the same way, look at Pythagoras' club.

>>16730174
bait

>>16730995
retard, read what you reply to

>>16730846
What if you had a clear coherent point instead of retarded hypotheticals and other nonsense?

>>16730337
You realize that the internet is the largest repository of books in the history of mankind, right?

>the most beautiful part of science is its ability for self-correction

>>16731860
erm actually the earth is the largest repository of books

>>16731864
No earth is where they burn books, plenty of unprinted books exist on the internet.

>>16731882
>the internet isnt on earth
ok sure, whatever
but do you seriously believe that the amount of unprinted books is greater than the amount of unscanned books?