Science doesn't know how to define magnetism properly. No wonder you're all confused.

All I want in life is to sexually abuse a genius man. Is that too much to ask for?

>>16731318 (OP)
let's hear the alternative

>>16731318 (OP)
Mah boi Ken has got you covered
https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small

>>16731318 (OP)
>I'm too stupid to understand it so it must be wrong

>>16731318 (OP)
Magnetism is very well understood.

>>16731498
which is why we have absolutely no problem making monopoles right?

>>16731513
No. Our understanding of magnetism makes it clear that magnetic monopoles are fake and gay.

>>16731498
oh yeah?
>neuronal current spikes are about 10 nanoamps to a microamp
>while cuddling, brains can be 10 cm apart
>1 microamp of current generates a magnetic field of 2 picoTesla by biot-savart law
>faraday's law states this induces a current on the order of 10^-28 amperes, far lower than can influence a neuron
>meanwhile, in reality, brainwave entrainment is a well-observed phenomenon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainwave_entrainment
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-04464-4
here we see the science shows brain-to-brain entrainment is observed, in direct contradiction to the prediction of maxwell's equations that describe magnetism. so, tell me again how well understood this is

>>16731516
None of that appears to demonstrate entrainment purely mediated by the brain waves themselves. The wikipedia article mentions entrainment mediated by external processes such as lights and sounds, and the paper is explicitly about entrainment mediated through speech. Why are you being such a faggot?

>>16731513
>Oh we understand [Thing]?
>Well can you violate core principles of how [Thing] works?
>Thought not, chud! Checkmate!
You are more stupid than you think

>>16731519
Brain-to-brain entrainment: EEG interbrain synchronization while speaking and listening

>>16731521
Yes. What does that have to do with
>neuronal current spikes are about 10 nanoamps to a microamp
>while cuddling, brains can be 10 cm apart
>1 microamp of current generates a magnetic field of 2 picoTesla by biot-savart law
>faraday's law states this induces a current on the order of 10^-28 amperes, far lower than can influence a neuron
>meanwhile, in reality, brainwave entrainment is a well-observed phenomenon
?
It doesn't matter how strong the field is. The entrainment is mediated through speaking and listening, not directly by the magnetic fields produced by the brain.

>>16731523
by what mechanism are you claiming my voice induces currents in your brain?

>>16731525
Are you retarded? Any perception produces currents in the brain. How exactly does that work? It's complicated. Anyway, I'm finished with (you).

>>16731527
what if i am?

>>16731527
An ion pump isn't a current.
or let me ask this question, where is the living body's potential reference?

>>16731629
I'm merely using his terminology. Whether it's technically a "current" is completely irrelevant, because the point is that the purported entrainment has nothing to do with direct brainwave/field interaction.

>>16731318 (OP)
Defining what magnetism "is" without resorting to nonsense equations spam is a major problem in the philosophy of science.
>t. not OP but probably read the same paper as OP

We don't really understand gravity either. Sure we can predict it and write pretty accurate equations, but we don't know why these things happen, just that they do.

>>16731513
ive literally made monopoles since I was a kid

if you cant figure it out then youre too retarded to be using the internet imo
>>16731662
what part do you not understand? we live in a universe with fields. is gravity also a mystery to you lot?

>>16731669
>fundamental force is fundamental
>REEEEEEEEEE
You'll never be satisfied.

>>16731671
i don't remember the paper an can't be asked, but I believe K Popper talked about it as well.
the point is moot though, I can tell in your posts you're a zealot who is already confused why anyone would pose such a question.

>>16731515
>i dont know how to make something that means its not real
got it chud

>>16731513
every electron is a magnetic monopole

>>16731471
>The "electron microscope" Lie
Lmao, this shit is hilarious. Where did you find it?

>>16731672
But why?

Post feynman_magnets.html