Thread 16733352

Are humans getting more beautiful than ever? Will we arrive at a point where there will minimal difference between who is "ugly" and who is "beautiful"?

>>16733352 (OP)
No.

>>16733352 (OP)
average girl with a good hairdresser. As for your question, I cannot answer it without racism

There are some really beautiful humans with beautiful face mutations causing things like bigger than normal smiles, redder than normal lips, more perfect ears, facial symmetry and nose or more perfect arc'd eyes.

beauty is just information, genes passed on to offspring, I'm ugly and without mixing with the most beautiful person on the planet, will create only new ugly people.

>>16733358
They're really rare though. I seen four in my Lifetime. Trust me, these really beautiful people exist above the top of what you see in fame. Made from a very good mother and father who correlate well

>>16733352 (OP)
No?

>>16733357
If that is by any chance average then OP assumption would be correct.

>>16733352 (OP) Perception.

>>16733352 (OP)
>Less whites than ever
>Less redheads than ever
No, humans are not getting more beautiful at all what planet do you live on??
I imagine you could take any poster now, slap him down in the middle ages and the first peasant girl he sees is going to make his dick rock hard.
And I don't gamble.

>>16733352 (OP)
There will be a more pronounced gulf between the beautiful and the ugly.

>>16733358
>>16733352 (OP)
>>16733369

white people got selected for beauty, at some point, 4000 years ago, people started to think "I must get a beautiful wife no matter the cost" and the most succesful men did

>physical prowess: dont care
>intelligence: everything goes if she aint retarded at least

meanvile, black people got selected like this (4000 years ago, not talkinb about American slavery here)

>immunity to malaria
>good physical strength to battle with lions
>women who bring lots of babies
>how does she look like? dont care.

>>16733352 (OP)
>Are humans getting more beautiful than ever?
That was more than 30,000 years ago as hunter-gatherers, the average skull of hunter-gatherers exceeds the level of development of today's supermodels and movie stars.

>>16733556
Whites are the physically strongest race. They're also the biggest. In terms of raw athleticism, probably #2 (if you consider black Africans one race, though in truth they have a lot of genetic diversity and could be split into several races).
In terms of raw IQ they're 2nd behind East Asians, and in terms of intellectual output they're #1 by far.
Among the major races anyway. If you add Ashkenazi Jews as their own race (they occupy the intermediate between Southern Europe and the Levant), then Jews are #1 in IQ, and therefore whites #3, and in terms of intellectual output they are #2, but per-capita they are #1 (whites #2).
So the final stats are (parentheses denotes the value if you include Ashkenazi Jews. Total is out of 10-12 races in the case that black Africans remain as one race)
>Whites
IQ: 2nd (3rd)
Intellectual output/capita: 1st (2nd)
Beauty: 1st
Strength: 1st
Size: 1st
Athleticism: 2nd
They're also a race on the decline, and were totally and comprehensively conquered by Jews.

>>16733372
That is outrageous. Most non whites look like goblins, chimps, or demonic spawn.

>>16733556
>white people got selected for beauty, at some point, 4000 years ago, people started to think "I must get a beautiful wife no matter the cost" and the most succesful men did
It's more likely there was a confluence between reproductive tribal taboos, cultural use of body paint, predisposition to albinism, and retreating glaciers

>>16733556
>4000 years
Library. Burned. Why?
>>16734301
Really? Albinism? You know most Europeans tan, right?

>>16733409
Mmm yes, the sour stench of unwashed funk, the visuals of dirty clothes and matted-down hair, the intellect of fucking bonobo... definitely gets my dick hard

>>16733352 (OP)
Go outside
Short answer: No
Long answer: We are getting uglier, fatter, and dumber

>>16733556
You forgot bbc and muscles