Thread 16738034

>being a homo is genetic
>its okay to be a homo now
>homos get with men instead of marrying women and reproducing then getting side homo action
>the genes that result in the various flavors of phenotypic homosexuality are rapidly depleted from the pool
>brief 100yr zenith of homos
>then 1 million year nadir

Scientifically speaking, is there any other outcome? Sure a random mutation could bring it back, but not on the scale of millions of people.

>>16738034 (OP)
I don’t believe homosexuality is genetic, I believe it is spread through child molestation. But what your [math]\it reductio[/math] doesn’t take into account is that homosexuals usually are happy and willing to fuck a female, for example as part of a larger orgy event, or if she is a child etc.

>>16738034 (OP)
>>being a homo is genetic
it's not, you become a homo from childhood trauma

>>16738041
hahahahahaha
I have gay people in my life that I hate too

There is nothing wrong with being homo but there is everything wrong with being gay. Yes there is a difference.

Sometimes, homos marry women, have children, get divorced, and get with men. I've known 2 in my lifetime. I don't think it'll disappear from not breeding when this happens.

I actually read an article about this very topic some time ago.
Essentially what was hypothesized is the gene in question may not be a "gay gene" per se. But a cocksucking gene.

They went into some stats showing that the mothers of gay men tended to have a lot more sexual partners in their life time. Same applied to the sisters of gay men. So the reason homos are still around isn't even to do with any sort of stigma. It's just a trait that is advantageous to one sex while detrimental to another. The women become turbo sluts and pump out turbo slut daughters and faggot sons.

>>16738034 (OP)
>yadda, yadda
>baldness "gene"
>not sexy, no sexing
>why still "gene"¿
>checkmate peapod breeders
Your gay uncle provides more resources to the group than you knocked-up mom.
Populations evolve, OP, not individuals.

>>16738034 (OP)
Twin studies provide strong evidence that being homosexual is not a heavily genetic trait; there are plenty of identical twins where one twin is gay but the other is not.

>>16738034 (OP)
>Scientifically speaking, is there any other outcome?
What if it's not a gay gene but a being attracted to guys gene? It will proliferate because of women (as always.)

>>16738034 (OP)
>he thinks homo is genetic
Your mistake is seeing afflictions and reading traits. They are damaged. The features you use to spot them are inflicted.

>>16738034 (OP)
It’s just probably a random trait that makes our species function alternately from the norm.

The vast array of different personality traits make humans very diverse in the outcomes and actions humans choose in the way we live our life.

Certain characteristics make you choose certain paths in life. Every personality is an important integral part of our species and is the reason we have arrived at the place we are in history.

Maybe it’s no accident that we are here.

Gay people have always existed and always will.

Being a homo is probably not genetic, but a social trait that emerges when we reach later stages of rat utopia. If you dont want your son to be a fag, you'd need to have time to parent them and not be an asshole. Industrialized society makes this nearly impossible if you're wage slaving and leaving them with your wifey for the most critical years of their development.