Why do normies hate science?

>>16738142 (OP)
its boring and they have better shit to do like make money and post on instagram.

>>16738142 (OP)
Scientists are normies. If they didn't conform then they wouldn't even get a degree let alone get the exclusive favor of being part of a research group never mind getting others to give them money for their research. Scientists even have partners and kids and pay taxes and vote and go to parties and drink and all the normie stuff.

>>16738142 (OP)
>Why do normies hate science?
Because science is in an ever constant state of being corrected they hate being wrong, this is why when they become academics they lie, steal, and cheat.

Academia is simply a position of power to them, they hate Truth, they love power.

>>16738142 (OP)
it gets in their way of their feelings

>>16738196
>>16738173
>>16738142 (OP)
because you locked them in their houses for a year and called for them to be rounded up in concentration camps if they didnt get vaccinated against a disease you created

>>16738199
both people on the left and right are moving away from science
>anti-vaccine, anti-space exploration, trannies are real women

Scientist are the most conformist bunch.

>>16738142 (OP)
Idk but I hate science because it has been corrupted by every task it has been tasked with.

>>16738142 (OP)
doing science requires higher order thinking. rejecting poorly founded, impulsive conclusions is difficult when there is no immediately apparent reward for doing so.

>>16738199
being this much of an alcoholic is a skill issue.
>>>/pol/ stay on your containment board for fuck's sake.

>>16738142 (OP)
They don't understand it, because they way people are told science works in elementary school is condensed to a point of absurdity.
There was a massive anti-science and anti-intellectual push during the pandemic (which you can see all over this fucking website) because a lot of people were seeing how science actually works for the very first time, and they had a spastic emotional reaction to it.
It's much easier to stick to your lifestyle of slamming 4 beers for breakfast every day, than interrogate whether one of your existing beliefs could be Wrong.

>>16738199
This.

"The Science" (sponsored by Pfizer) was used as an excuse to censor, threaten, subjugate, imprison, and ruin anyone who didn't cooperate with absurd COVID demands. And to control and steal from those who did cooperate. Any actual scientists, doctors, journalists etc who spoke out were shut down by the full force of tyrannical governments and the corporate news industrial complex. The good name of science was appropriated on the world stage for greedy and authoritarian ends.

People generally trusted scientific institutions and scientific consensus before their faith in science was weaponised against them. Now many people see science as just another lying whore of the corrupt establishment, even though what was shoved down people's throats was the opposite of real science: useful conclusions, confirmed by transparently biased "science," followed by intolerance of dissenting ideas.

And we still have people like this: >>16739131, trying to sweep the mountain of bullshit under the rug by ridiculing angry victims of this monumental fraud. It's disgusting.

>>16739136
>ridiculing angry victims
it's a public service. you're degenerate cunts with sub-90 IQs that have openly, proudly declared that you can not function in a civilized society.
in more prosperous times, we had wars overseas that we could ship creatures like you to, so you could run out into No Man's Land and die a useless death.

>>16739132
>someone dies from a treatable illness because the hospital turned them away due to the COVID lockdown
>they happen to have tested positive for COVID (without symptoms) weeks before
>this is now counted as a "COVID death," adding to the statistic used to demand more lockdowns
SCIENCE!™

Anything is possible when you just make shit up.
There's no meaningful difference between dying "with" COVID-19 and dying "from" COVID-19 if you don't have severe brain damage from childhood lead exposure and adolescent alcoholism.

>>16739138
Do you have anything more substantial than empty, baseless abuse? Civilisation is supposed to be based on reason, not arbitrary compliance with self-destructive bullshit being imposed by tyrants and profiteers. I suppose North Korea is the pinnacle of civilisation in your mind.

>>16739144
It's dishonest to imply that someone who was hit by a bus died from the flu they happened to have at the time. It's dystopian to impose restrictions based on that blatant epidemiological fraud. It's evil to do so for profit, and it's idiotic to support it because you don't understand it.

>>16739152
>Civilisation is supposed to be based on reason
It is. You're just too fucking stupid to grasp it, and you insist on pretending that's everyone else's problem.

>imply that someone who was hit by a bus died from the flu they happened to have at the time
Once again,
>Anything is possible when you just make shit up.
The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate that your example happened, to a statistically significant degree. Like if more than 0.01% of all recorded Covid deaths (so approx. 700 people, worldwide) were people that were hit by buses.

>>16739144
Yeah there is. The chief health officer of Alberta tried portraying a 14 year old who died of brain cancer as a COVID-19 victim and only backtracked and apologized after widespread criticism. There are plenty more stories like that. The purpose was to spread fear not provide accurate data.

>>16739154
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-reported-sars-cov-2-deaths-in-england/covid-19-confirmed-deaths-in-england-to-31-december-2020-report

>COVID-19 deaths
>In this report [COVID-19] deaths are defined as:
>a death in a person with a laboratory-confirmed positive COVID-19 test and either died within 60 days of the first specimen date
>or
>died more than 60 days after the first specimen date, only if COVID-19 is mentioned on the death certificate

They told you not to do your own research, and you faithfully obeyed. That is why you are ignorant of this subject.

>>16739165
>They told you not to do your own research, and you faithfully obeyed.
No. They told people like (You) not to do your own research, because you have no background in science and struggle to decipher the academic language in which papers are written. You can't parse the difference between two given papers' methodologies, yet you demand to be treated like an expert because you've read the screeds of 44 different Facebook methheads.
I did plenty of my own research and came to deductive conclusions based on what I read. I might as well be a deity compared to creatures like (You).

>>16739156
>There are plenty more stories like that.
Anecdotes are not data. You have to show statistical significance, you stupid cunt.
This is why you aren't treated like a functional adult by anyone of value.

>>16738219
>anti-space exploration
Flat Earth is anti-science. Not supporting government spending on space exploration isn't necessarily anti-science, it's just having different budget priorities.

>>16739167
I notice you didn't even try to address the government's own admission that COVID-19 deaths were counted based on positive test results up to 2 months prior to death, regardless of the actual cause of death. Or the fact that this would massively inflate the numbers used to frighten people into compliance. Nope, you prefer to rely on shaming, insults, abuse, and baseless assumptions about people who disagree with you.

Can you, with your godlike powers of deduction, answer this: If someone tested positive for COVID-19, and 6 weeks later died in a car crash, would their death be counted as a COVID-19 death according to the methodology described by Public Health England in the link I provided?

My assumptions are not baseless.
Post degree, salary, and current blood-alcohol level.

>>16739167
Nta but your are obviously a retard and the other guy is right. Why even come to a science board if all you are going to do is denigrate and refuse to engage with his talking points. You are projecting your own stupidness. You're acting like you need to be genius IQ to read a fucking paper especially nowadays when you can just ask gpt to explain something you don't get

>>16739169
I'm so glad you made a snotty reply so I can provide evidence. Not that you'll accept any of it.


Independent research:
https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022-10-05-Correlation-Proof-that-Canadas-COVID-19-mortality-statistics-are-incorrect.pdf


Testimony to the National Citizens Inquiry from William Munroe - former BC population statistician:
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/witness/william-munroe/


Disclaimer from the government on Ontario on statistics:
>Any case marked as "Fatal" is included in the deaths data. Deaths are included whether or not COVID-19 was determined to be a contributing or underlying cause of death.
>As a result of how data is recorded by health units into public health information databases, the ministry is not able to accurately separate how many people died directly because of COVID versus those who died with a COVID infection.


And official confirmation from the health authority of Canada's largest province:

>Dr. Kieran Moore, Ontario’s chief medical officer, confirmed that approximately 50% of COVID hospitalizations represent people who aren't actually there suffering from COVID, but have gone to the hospital with something else.
>“We know roughly 45 percent of admissions to hospital are incidental to being diagnosed with COVID-19. In the intensive care unit, roughly 20 percent are incidentally testing positive. It may be that some of these deaths are incidentally correlated to COVID-19,” he said.

because even normies are aware the way people use the term "science" is dumb as shit.
>science says you must wear the mask to not spread the virus
>did you see that liquid changing its color? thats sience *basedface*
>yes bro telegony was science back in the days, nowadays is not. dont you know science is constantly changing?
and there is also how people use "science"
>what worked for you wont work for others, there is no scientific evidence
>the international community which is only usa, did not approve your paper because it lacks scientific rigor

Remember, science always changes. what is supposed to be an universal and necessary truth is not true years later, so it was never science in the first place but we called it science, and this might still happen today and we will still call it science, and if we dont we are labeled as retards. this is what no definition does to a mf, and people wonder why normies hate science.

>>16739178
>so it was never science in the first place
just say you don't get epistemology, it's OK bro

>@16739176
>I'm a-a-actually happy that you c-c-c-c-called me a stupid cunt Le xDDdD
cope, seethe, mald. I'm under no obligation to take you seriously, you are not my peer.

>>16739185
Why should anyone here take you seriously when all you can provide is shit flinging and invisible scientific qualifications?

I'm just doing the public service of calling retards what they are.
Nobody's obligated to "take me seriously," all I'm arguing is that nobody should take you degenerate anti-intellectual faggots seriously either.

>>16739191
>degenerate anti-intellectual faggots
This more accurately describes you than anyone else here.

>>16738142 (OP)
science is jewish magic

>>16739201
Which board do you think you're on?

>>16739199
>n-n-n-n-n-no y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-you
Cope.
Seethe.
Mald.

>>16739205
Not only is it true, it's the only thing you have convincingly demonstrated in this entire thread.

I wouldn't be here bullying you if you worthless drug addicts could learn to stay on Facebook.
Quit shitting up every half-decent blue board with your inbred prattle.

>>16738142 (OP)
Boring. Overly technical. Too much thinking.

It’s literally a personality trait that makes you like science.

Maybe it's because we're afraid to be a little poetic.
>"We have harnessed the element of lightning and put it into our the palm of our hands"
>"Well akshually..."

>>16738142 (OP)
1) it's hard
2) when it isn't hard and proves me wrong, it is an attack on my identity, which should be illegal
3) when its easy and proves me right, other people hate it because they're stupid and evil

>>16738219
tranny science is weird because for some absurd reason, administering cross sex hormones does lead to relatively good patient outcomes despite nature being quite clear about its chromosomes

>>16738142 (OP)
Class instinct.

>>16739178
It's a good thing being retarded isn't a death sentence, otherwise you'd be fucked.

>>16739176
>independent research is a bunch of disgraced PhDs with expertise hardly related to the subject that believe viruses aren't real and a "health coach herbalist" (not a single epidemiologist)
>anecdotal testimony by a statistician
You still haven't shown statistical significance like he asked, just a bunch of anecdotes and junk science. Anybody can write a shit paper and submit it to a garbage journal or researchgate.

>>16739551
Not that Anon, but:
I don't discriminate against "disgraced PhDs" these days myselfs. Since scientific institutions were hijacked by money and power interests, you can easily become "disgraced" for telling an unpopular or unsanctioned truth. Meanwhile, many PhDs in good standing are glorified corporate spokesmen, political activists, or government stooges.

You say that Anon hasn't shown statistical significance. Did you miss the second half of their post? Those are (apparently) official government sources confirming statistically significant figures. Are you saying Ontario's chief medical officer used junk science to find his data? Or did he not say that: "...approximately 50% of COVID hospitalizations represent people who aren't actually there suffering from COVID..."

If that's what Ontario's chief medical officer said, then it doesn't matter how disgraced the PhD who included it in their paper is, or how garbage the journal it's submitted to.

>>16738142 (OP)
when your spokespeople are autists, soibois and sanctimonious pseuds, is it any surprise the normies reject your screeds?

>>16738142 (OP)
Normies fucking LOVE science. They hate scientific rigor.

>>16738142 (OP)
It's not as if science has been caught lying to the public severely hundreds of times for political purposes.

>>16739720
it's not science itself that lies
it's fraudulent scientists and scientific institutions who lie about science for greed or power that give science a bad name

They don't. But when was the last time someone tried to present it to them as accessible, without coming across as painful and obnoxious? The kind of well-educated people you find on places like 4chan and other websites tend to look down their noses at people with less knowledge, and come across as abrasive and arrogant. The only people who really try to reach them are people like Neil Degrasse Tyson, and he's still rude and obnoxious.

>>16739191
We salute you. The internet is becoming more retarded by the minute and instead of educating themselves for free, people choose to get their info from their aunt and some dude. Convenience lowered the intelligence of the internet collectively like it did for the Auto. People just simple can't be assed.