>>16742213
>Ah yes, this paper was published by the National Library Of Medicine but no one caught this but YOU because you are such a gigabrain.
Because no one is able to read every paper ever, retard. Especially in a large journal like that. I know you don't know how research or statistics works, but I can assure you that the conclusion you and your grifter e-daddies are coming to is not the same as the actual author said in the paper:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3092984/
>Political liberalism and conservatism were correlated with brain structure
> Liberalism was associated with the gray matter volume of anterior cingulate cortex (Associated with decision-making, error monitoring, and even aspects of social cognition)
>Conservatism was associated with increased right amygdala size (plays a crucial role in processing emotions, particularly fear and aggression)
> Results offer possible accounts for cognitive styles of liberals and conservatives
1) He said it's POSSIBLE (not certain) that this accounts for the cognitive styles of liberals and conservatives
2) I still don't think the study is very good since it doesn't account for age and gender (61% of the participants are female and the study only deals with YOUNG adults), which are important factors for how one forms political opinions. That's why the sample size of the experimental population becomes very important since it's not representative of the general public and it isn't even close to monitoring or approximating bio-social phenomenaa you could match on an scale larger than maybe a county with a small population
Basically, this is a study that is interesting but very throwaway and I doubt the researcher continued down this line after this paper. Yet, retarded grifters and their idiot cohorts like you chomped down on it because it makes other side look bad without actually reading into the paper, basically proving them to be illiterate in both statistics and how to interpret research.