>>16744005 (OP)
crazy that someone can get Michael Peskin to come on and have a respectable conversation with him and then wreck it all by behaving like an absolute clown in the comments
I wonder what these guys think of appearing in his video when this is how he's going to behave after having them on lol
>>16744095
I think this is clear evidence peskin wasn't really sure who Dave was or what Dave does. I assume Dave sent out a few emails praising himself, enouncing Sabine, linked 1-2 videos from each, and Peskin agreed to meet for $$$. I cannot fathom Peskin agreeing to talk to this loser if he knew this is how Dave behaves.
>>16744007
LOL.
Was this the 3.5 hour video he made where he interviewed 5 string theorists to "debunked" someone?
If so I can "debunk" him in the same way but in a lot less of time by referring to legendary mathematician and physicsist Sir Roger Penrose (who intellectually Josef Fritzels all of those people he had on to interview).
Penrose states that string theory is a branch of mathemathics and not a branch of physics, because its untestable - cant run Experiments and verify it
I had Sabine appear in a dream of mine, actually ;^).
I was in this giant garage warehouse, and found this bin of free tools. I set them aside, I had claimed them in my mind. I'm walking away and this German speaking woman approaches and starts taking them. I turn around and see this, confront her. We argue. The tools are mine. Then I wake up.
Gentlemen please. Let us reduce this controversy to two simple statements.
There are superior people like Sabine who should be lauded as living Gods.
Then there are subhumans like Dave who need to be forcefully sterilized, with a blunt butter knife, for the good of Humanity.
That's really all that needs to be said and if anyone disagrees then they should become well acquainted with blunt butter knives as well.
I have spoken. You pond slime may go about your business now.