← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16745201

18 posts 10 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16745201 >>16745276 >>16746928 >>16747103 >>16747180 >>16747181 >>16747416 >>16749937
Embedded and EE book recommendations
Does anyone here have book recommendations to get into embedded development ? I'd like to understand the physics behind electronics.
Anonymous No.16745276 >>16747128 >>16750848
>>16745201 (OP)
for as ubiquitous as electronics, i have yet to find a great single source of information on them.
i personally have a copy of Jaeger's Microelectronic Circuit Design that i bought for like $5 that i find surprisingly enlightening
(pdf: https://students.aiu.edu/submissions/profiles/resources/onlineBook/n8v5U8_Microelectronic_Circuit_Design.pdf)
Horowitz's The Art of Electronics is a commonly cited authorative book, although i've never gotten past the first couple chapters
(pdf: https://kolegite.com/EE_library/books_and_lectures/%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0/_The%20Art%20of%20Electronics%203rd%20ed%20%5B2015%5D.pdf)
truth be told, once you have basics under your belt, the application notes on datasheets are probably the best source of hard information on anything. buying parts and experimenting with them (or running simulations e.g. https://www.falstad.com/circuit/ or SPICE) is irreplaceable to understanding

i think learning electronics is difficult because it's a huge pile of approximations. i find it easier to start with maxwell's equations and then apply the approximations to derive circuit theory and other models. this is because maxwell's equations are what unify everything, so rather than memorizing a constellation of seemingly unrelated models with fuzzy domains of application, you can see how those models arise by making particular assumptions and approximations that fit the given thing under study. while it is a circuitous path, learning E&M first is what i'd suggest to somebody that really wants to know their shit, then start on electronics. the best resource for that is Griffith's Introduction to Electromagnetism.
(pdf: https://nucleares.unam.mx/~martinel/griffiths_4ed.pdf)
this will teach you very little about practical electronics, but it will well prepare you well for learning more about electronics in a structured way.
Anonymous No.16746928 >>16746929
>>16745201 (OP)
>>>/diy/ohm
Anonymous No.16746929 >>16747012 >>16747026 >>16747166
>>16746928
dead board
Anonymous No.16747012
>>16746929
Yes, that's what people go to that thread for help with
Anonymous No.16747026 >>16747110
>>16746929
not really. it's slower than /sci/ but still active, and much more helpful and hands on than this shithole
Anonymous No.16747103
>>16745201 (OP)
Paul Scherz wrote Practical Electronics for Inventors, but you'll find what books you need in order on /ohm/.
Anonymous No.16747110
>>16747026
Unironically reddit would be a better resource at this point
Anonymous No.16747128
>>16745276
Thanks for your in-depth answer. I've got some dev boards (PYNQ-Z2 and Basys-3) and I'll be trying out some useful projects with them.
Anonymous No.16747166
>>16746929
it's not dead, it's just not spammed 24/7 by ai agents like the popular boards
Anonymous No.16747180
>>16745201 (OP)
1/2
Anonymous No.16747181
>>16745201 (OP)
2/2
Enjoy
Anonymous No.16747416
>>16745201 (OP)
you could check out johnathan valvanos stuff. his website has a lot of open access shit from the courses he teaches, including projects etc. might be worth a look.
Anonymous No.16749937 >>16750046
>>16745201 (OP)
>I'd like to understand the physics behind electronics.
Physical electronics is very different from embedded electronics.
Anonymous No.16750046
>>16749937
>he thinks he understands anything about electronics because he took a computer architecture class as a CS major
the world isn't built of 1s and 0s, recognize the gulf between digital logic synthesis and electronics is as wide as the ocean
Anonymous No.16750848 >>16750952
>>16745276
>i think learning electronics is difficult because it's a huge pile of approximations.
A known good path to understanding basic electronics in general and RF electronics in particular, is to study for the /ham/ exam. Lately, also DSP is part of the skill set for a /ham/ operator. More info, with FAQ and library, is over in >>>/diy/ham
Anonymous No.16750952 >>16751242
>>16750848
ham is small potatoes, and half of the exam is knowledge of regulations, not physics/electronics
you won't get far if that's your main entry point to electronics, even with an extra license
that's not to shit on ham, it's just pointing out it's not a great resource for getting good at electronics in general (unless one make friends with people that are electronics experts by way of ham)
Anonymous No.16751242
>>16750952
>ham is small potatoes, and half of the exam is knowledge of regulations, not physics/electronics
You know I wrote about a part, not the totality, right? That is what I did and when I took the exam we had to know plenty of electronics. After all thel icense gives you permission to design and operate high voltage equipment. I did my degrees after that, including physics and electronics.
>you won't get far if that's your main entry point to electronics, even with an extra license
Do you have a license?
>that's not to shit on ham, it's just pointing out it's not a great resource for getting good at electronics in general (unless one make friends with people that are electronics experts by way of ham)
The /ham/ library contains books on electronics and circuit designs, did you check those out?