>>16760213
>a 3D model is made on autocas, NX or whatever software, and then they take the blueprints you need to make the part.
So what? The source material is the 3D model. The blueprints are like a small sample of information that you can put in paper and it only works for simple solids. On the computer you can see the same 3 common views, any projection from any angle, any cut, any measurements of distances and angles absolute and relative. You can zoom in small features.
>3D model is useless in actual work
If the part is made with a CNC machine you will make the program in an external computer and simulate it. You will then do small changes based on the and materials actually available, and then start making defective parts in a soft material (likely aluminium) to work out the kinks, then change to the relevant material, change the program a bit to see that it works and then repeat it 500 times.
On a manual machine theres still a program of sorts, a sequence of operations you have to follow though its not written as software. You can do all this with a computer, the planning of operations.
Paper is useful if you want something portable that you can take with you to the machine but might as easily get a tablet.
When the part is simple like a cube with a hole, or 2 holes, it makes no difference.
Machinist hold to blueprints only because its tradition, like medical doctors that force interns to do 36 hour shifts only because they were forced to do so.