Thread 16758744

18 posts 8 images /sci/

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:12:10 AM No.16758744 >>16758751 >>16758764 >>16758772 >>16758781 >>16758950 >>16758974 >>16759076

Screenshot_20250822-130952.png md5: 4aa7916b... 🔍

AI can now do original mathematics. How are the stemmies coping? The only jobs left for you will be in prostitution, so you'd better be practicing your butthole exercises kek.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:18:41 AM No.16758751

>>16758744 (OP)
Kek that just proves mathematics is all gibberish anyways

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:21:15 AM No.16758752

Didn't read. I hate AI.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:31:40 AM No.16758762 >>16758767

>a very specific problem that GPT-5 did in extremely specific conditions trained on extremely specific data that isn't practical for most modern use
>let the public over-sensationalize it since all they understand is 'GPT DO MATH' this will help us get more grant money
Also glowie fuck off and get fucked.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:32:38 AM No.16758764

>>16758744 (OP)
AIsisters won, ludditechuds lost.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:34:36 AM No.16758767 >>16758769

>>16758762
Holy goalpost moving, Batman.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:36:37 AM No.16758769

puppy.png md5: cf652a1d... 🔍

>>16758767
Slob on my knob.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:37:43 AM No.16758771

Humanities chads won.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:38:37 AM No.16758772

>>16758744 (OP)
Damn, they should let chatgpt work 24/7 maybe in this way AI can create new math areas.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:45:47 AM No.16758781 >>16758788

>>16758744 (OP)
This is fake, the training data already had 1.75 in it. Never believe anything AI salespeople tell you.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 5:52:34 AM No.16758788

>>16758781
what's 1.75l? Litres?

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 6:03:52 AM No.16758797 >>16758994

>>>/g/106330393
original post from Bubeck and not some hypeslop eACK account

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 10:40:01 AM No.16758950

>>16758744 (OP)
Yeah, but can it answer political questions in the way I want it to? No? Well, I'm afraid it's checkmate.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 11:06:02 AM No.16758974 >>16759073 >>16759193

maff.jpg md5: 97a22a05... 🔍

>>16758744 (OP)
Apparently it's a bunch of horseshit tho

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 11:26:05 AM No.16758994

>>16758797
>Bubeck and not some hypeslop eACK account
Is there a difference?

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 12:38:31 PM No.16759073

1727878316766902.png md5: 6e63cd2a... 🔍

Every problem was 'original research' the first time someone solved it and every problem has an army of midwits who couldn't solve it to save their lives. Tell me specifically who was trying and failing to figure out the simple looking (though I'm no expert) derivation in >>16758974 and what their CV looks like and I'll tell you whether I'm impressed or not.

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 12:43:18 PM No.16759076

>>16758744 (OP)
lmao good thing this type of math has nothing to do with reality. ideally they all lose their jobs

Anonymous 8/22/2025, 2:25:02 PM No.16759193

>>16758974
This is the kind of thing that the average Russian mathematician would simply state without details in his paper because the computation is "easy". There's nothing interesting about this proof, and it mostly shows that Bubeck would struggle in a first year grad class.