Thread 16759518

Where did he go?

>>16759518 (OP)
Israel

>>16759518 (OP)
moria

>>16759518 (OP)
OTK

>>16759518 (OP)
Russia apparently

>>16759518 (OP)
turkey, obviously

>>16760275

SHE is right here.

>>16759518 (OP)
Sells kebab in every major european city

>>16760270
Something like this. Bulgaria maybe.

About 40% of the entire Neanderthal genome is spread across the current human population, we pretty much just fucked them out of existence with our larger group sizes. Also this value reflects that only male Neanderthals could mate successfully with Female humans, which basically means they pretty much Fucked THEMSELVES out of existence which is kind of hilarious. Sapiens Sapiens Gyatt too strong

>>16759518 (OP)
Looks like he has a vending cart that sells crab juice

>>16759518 (OP)
that's just an average balkanoid

Everyone except Africans have some neanderthal DNA, we basically out fucked them like >>16761450 said. Whites, Asians, and Jews have the most, while Africans have 0%. Why? I don't know.

>>16761815
Since we have not seen Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA, we can assume that non-Africans are the result of male Neanderthals and female homo sapens.
While Neanderthals were considered somewhat sub-human, it was OK to say whites had Neandertal DNA but unacceptable to say also Africans south of Sahara had Neanderthal DNA. Then it appeared that Neandertals gave us the ability for abstract thinking, and then they simply had to find Neanderthal DNA also in Africans, and of course they found it. Expansion pressure ws out of Africa and Sahara was a huge barrier, so I am not sure how they proposed people would enter Africa against the flow of people leaving.

>>16761992
Out of Africa theory was debunked

>>16762158
So what is the consensus now?

>>16762312
In of Africa, Of out The Homo Sapiens

>>16759518 (OP)
That's just the average Bulgarian

>>16761992
Imagine what processing power a person with 100% neander genes had if 1 or 2 percent already make you this smart and how much they felt the need to fuck aggressively

>>16761992
Does the guy in this picture >>16759518 (OP) look smart to you?

>>16759518 (OP)
>literal neck muscles bulging upwards
>head mounted well below the obvious point
Imagine if they assembled the skeleton correctly. Just imagine the people whose trait you recognize.
But nah, can't see it because frail 90 year old posture.
Again. Not extinct. Extant, and fucking obvious. No, not (((obvious))). That shit's fucking fake.

>>16762681
Thankfully, smart does not correlate with looks. And I am grateful for that.

>>16762402
What does this even mean??

>>16762779
It does though, albeit not with good looks

>>16759518 (OP)
>history photographed
>a photo wax dummy
>not history anyway because its clearly prehistoric

>>16760275
Would upgrade her dna

>>16759518 (OP)
>>16760275
If East Asians have the most Neanderthal dna, why they always made these images of them looking like ancient cave Europeans?

Shouldn't they look more like Asians, aka slanted eyed bug people

>>16764875
>Neanderthal DNA map matches slanted eyed populations
>They looked like Euros with blue eyes and sheit

>>16764875
Wrong. Asians have the highest denisovan DNA, not neanderthal. The highest percentage of neanderthal dna is found in Italy. Also the neanderthals would have had light skin, but darker skinned inviduals would have existed in more southern places:
>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929717303798

>>16760346
Kek I said the exact same

>>16762158
No it wasn't. You took a headline at face value.

>>16762970
Something about muh white race probably.

>>16763001
>posts geeks
>calls them smart
Not how that works, mate.You'd think you'd notice terminology. You must be "very smart."

>>16759518 (OP)
>where did he go?
"he" didnt "go" anywhere. the species became extinct. but extinction is different from death.

>>16765419
>the species is extinct
Correction: we stopped categorizing the groups that exhibit those traits as neanderthal.
Most likely because "race isn't real."

>>16761815
Debunked
https://www.science.org/content/article/africans-carry-surprising-amount-neanderthal-dna

>>16765288
You'll never catch him

>>16760277
Lamo checked and underrated

>>16759518 (OP)
He rules the other monkes

>>16759518 (OP)
Where I am, because he's literally me

>>16766802
>https://www.science.org/content/article/africans-carry-surprising-amount-neanderthal-dna
I had a look
>It suggests much of that DNA came from Europeans migrating back into Africa over the past 20,000 years.
Is there any evidence that corroborates this? And why would Europeans go back to Africa whic was full of deserts and people already living there?

>>16769277
>Is there any evidence that corroborates this
Read the paper (even the article alludes to it.) North african populations have higher amounts of neanderthal dna than southern african populations, europeans have more neanderthal dna than north africans, and europeans/africans have more neanderthal dna in common than europeans/asians
>And why would Europeans go back to Africa
Too many reasons to think of, war, overhunting, climate, overpopulation, etc
>whic was full of deserts
Climates naturally change over time, deserts often go through cycles of humidification and desertification

>>16759518 (OP)
they run crypto scams now

>>16769290
>Read the paper (even the article alludes to it.)
I did. It was way too vague.
> North african populations have higher amounts of neanderthal dna than southern african populations,
First off, north africans are Arabs. Nobody disputed their genetics. The article states vaguely things happening within 20000 years but how do you discount any effects of Arab slave trade in African slaves?
>europeans have more neanderthal dna than north africans, and europeans/africans have more neanderthal dna in common than europeans/asians
Again the article was vague on how they determined what genes were in common with Europeans and Africans and also were of Neanderthal origins. They just decalre they discovered it.

>>16759532
Europeans have more neaderthal DNA than jews

>>16771149
>I did. It was way too vague.
You clearly did not. This is an anonymous forum, you do not need to lie to preserve your image because you have none
>north africans are Arabs
They did not use arabs in the study. They used data from the 1000 genomes project and the only super-saharran population used were berbers
>article was vague on how they determined what genes were in common with Europeans and Africans
Are you genuinely retarded?
>We applied IBDmix to samples... After filtering (STAR Methods), we identified 110.98 Gb of Neanderthal sequence among 2,504 modern individuals. When overlapping introgressed segments are merged, this equates to 1.29 Gb of unique Neanderthal sequence.

To the island of cyprus.

That photo was also taken in the last month

Some accountancy firm.

>>16769290
Isn't that because asians had a second admix event with denisovans?

>>16765288
>88
nice SS mustache tattoo kek

>>16764880

>Unnamed archaic slap bang in the middle of Africa

Who wants to be some scientists found out Africans have recent Erectus admixture but were shut down from releasing results

>>16773375

Lots of evidence a very specialised and low population high-altitude adapted species from around the Mongolian plateau/Tibet/Nepal/Everest mountain chain probably closest to Denisovans but possibly a distinct far-eastern Neanderthal relative whose cold adaptations allowed them an easier time adapting to the cold that is also often present at high altitudes.

It also looks more and more like Denisovans are just a slightly less archaic Erectus population rather than being adjacent to Neanderthals and the are only about as closely related to Neanderthals as Sapiens is.

I have a theory that the populations that mixed with the High-Altitude adapted species also became more successful in island/coastal environments due to increased ability to dive due to the same respiratory adaptations also helping with Respiratory endurance.

>>16773544
Weren't there other intermixes around sea and java?

>>16774231

Possibly, some of the the sentinelese islanders have absurd jawlines in photos and very wide faces overall, a bunch of them literally looked the black emojis lol, similar morphology to archaic skulls found in SEA without the brow ridges. They probably have the oldest lineage in SEA, possibly had interbreeding with a species similar but not as far gone as Floriensis at some point.

But what do I know. Being an armchairologist is fun anyway.

Maybe the Sentinelese have a bunch of Hobbit slaves working the cocununt mines on the island

>>16773332
>You clearly did not.
I did. Why should I lie?
>They did not use arabs in the study.
Irrelevant, and that does not address my question. Please try again.

>>16774662
>Why should I lie?
I truly have no idea. Maybe you were telling the truth and just lacked the ability to comprehend what you were reading.
>does not address my question
Then actually read the paper and learn how ibdmix's algorithm works. Outside of undergrad people usually won't have the patience to spoonfeed you publicly available information

>>16761450
does that mean neanderthal women were femcels?

>>16759518 (OP)
I swear this guy was driving the cab I was in yesterday.

Same thing that happened to other homo species. Fuccked out of existence and got absorbed by homo sapiens.

>>16761450
>we

>>16759518 (OP)
The Mushroom Kingdom.

>>16775824
>Same thing that happened to other homo species.
Yeah, right where we last saw him and redefined because "race isn't real."

>>16759518 (OP)
unironically white european women breed them out of existence. Over Neanderthal men realize how much better european women were they didn't go back to pure breeds.