Thread 16764033

>>16764033 (OP)
>high IQ
>believes bronze age jewish fairy tales
never the two shall meet

>>16764033 (OP)
The chance of someone actually having an IQ of 276 is essentially zero, if he really was as smart as he said he was he would've chosen a more realistic IQ to lie about having

If his is 276 then mine is 1,000.
>three honorary doctorate degrees in the fields of psychology, cognitive science, and education
I would school him all day long in these fields. I wouldnt really be interested in his research, he would be extremely interested in mine...and I havnt even mentioned Theology yet.

>>16764161
you sound threatened

>>16764218
>threatened
How could I be threatened by an acolyte of mine? His fields are the very ones I revolutionized by connecting them to other fields, such as Pure Mathematics and BioPhysics, and how each of those connects to Theology. That the Bible is a several thousand year old book on Developmental Cognition and Genomics through Eugenics, that "tribes and kingdoms" are markers for Systems Biology demarcations in the planetary Social Ecology.

Ive also lived in Korea for about a year, so my scent markers Ive left around therr are still fresh.
[kicks up dirt with my hind legs]

https://youtu.be/UY-8r3QDzyw

There's so much weird immoral shit and inconsistencies you could cite from the Bible it's not even worth breaking down

Oh no no no
/x/ bros?

>>16764238
>Nazi flag
>Europa is a Talmudic, Nafri/Asiatic colony now.
How well did that work out? Hitler fell for the Greek tragedy meme...being told a prophecy of Europa and in his very actions to prevent it...he ensured it.

Oh no no no /his/ters!

>Judah
Judah and Israel are the two Kingdoms, and Judah was lost repeatedly, scattered into other nations, becoming a "rootless international cliqué"...now hold Europe as a vassel.

>>16764250
>now hold Europe as a vassel.
And the US no longer.
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Central_Command
"In January 2021, Israel became the 21st country of the CENTCOM AOR, added to another 20 nations including Afghanistan, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, [...]"

Israel and Judah reunited in Israel, by freeing the Jews from slavery in neo-Babylon-Cairo (the US, this is why there is a pyramid on its money). How one is reconcilled in the US dictates the kingdoms on the other side of the world. Systems Biology on a planetary scale.

Just because a kingdom is living under a vassel doesnt mean that vassel doesnt own its own vassels...the King of Kings means the Kings are still Kings, Emperor is more fitting here as it denotes the difference between King and Emperor. Emperor of Mankind.

>>16764231
Infidels cannot interpret scripture, it is a maze of seemingly contradictory concepts because its flipping back and forth between Cognitive perspectives, a Matrix of perceptions and points of view.

>>16764238
KILL ALL NAZIS !

>>16764238
Nazism is bad and should disappear from earth forever
Im a proud nazi killer like my grandpa during WWII be careful idiot

Naziism is type of hueman, they perceive reality in a certain way and that way is known as Naziism (now). They can-not-see God, theyre "G-d's special people" because of that.

Master race, pure race lineage, ethno-state, mystical history...Anon...c'mon...

>>16764370
>KILL ALL NAZIS !
"Final Jewish solution."
>>16764371
>Nazism is bad and should disappear from earth forever
"Absolute extermination of Jews."

Youre a full blown genocidal Nazi...meanwhile the actual Nazis are allied with Israel and Judaism, you not so much. This is why the ADL gave Elon his Nazi salute pass...New World Order, nothing you know is what you thought, the history you grew up with has no relation to the present, you live on an alien planet now.

>like my grandpa during WWII
>be careful idiot
no u

You huemans, you marry Satanism and Holiness so now when one is swapped for the other you dont even notice. Hark, such fallible mortal-beings...such eternal irony.

>>16764238
dead kike here! get your dead kike! dead kike on a stick! get him while hes hot!

>>16764370
say when twinkletoes

>>16764426
Ima kill you like all your friends in 1946 be careful what you saying dummy

>>16764405
Your anti-Semitism is baseless. Jewish people have no connection to the lies you spread, those claims are pure nonsense and have been repeatedly debunked.

>>16764449
>Your anti-Semitism
Shut your cock-holster you confused Semite turned Shabbos-goy.
>Jewish people have no connection to the lies you spread.
You forget that the lies they spread for goys are picked up by their own...lost sheep is Is-Ra-El...(You).
>those claims
Have never been more founded and irrefutable, only those with no grip on reality attempt to do so.
>repeatedly debunked
Directed by Henry Bean.

"Bean was born in Philadelphia, to Fahnya (née Schorr) and Donald Bean (a lawyer).[1] Bean is Jewish.[2][1][3]"

Shabbos goy; a person who can break laws the REAL Jews cannot.

...who runs the porn industry? Who owned the slave ships? Who practices usery?

Anon...youre not Jewish, youre the Shabbos Goy worshipping an image-idol of God.

>>16764405
Your entire argument is a textbook example of Nazi and antisemitic propaganda,constructed not on evidence but on a series of logical fallacies, historical inversions, and conspiracy theories.First, your core claim that "actual Nazis are allied with Israel and Judaism" is a profound historical absurdity.Nazism is ideologically founded on antisemitism; its central, defining goal was the eradication of Jewish people and influence, culminating in the Holocaust.To suggest an alliance between the perpetrators of genocide and their intended victims is not only illogical but a deeply offensive insult to the memory of the six million murdered Jews.This claim relies on the oldest of antisemitic tropes that of a shadowy, powerful Jewish cabal controlling world events and is a classic example of "accusation in a mirror," where you project the crimes of your own ideology onto your victims to confuse and absolve yourself, your claim about the ADL is a baseless conspiracy theory designed to discredit a respected organization that exists to fight the very hatred you're promoting.The ADL has been consistently critical of Elon Musk for amplifying antisemitic content.The idea that they "gave him a pass" is factually incorrect and is merely a tactic to frame any Jewish organization as an all powerful entity that manipulates public discourse. This is another well-worn trope used to dismiss any factual criticism from watchdogs by claiming it's all part of a secret game.Finally, your invocation of the "NewWorldOrder" is the ultimate admission that your argument has no basis in reality.

>>16764405
This vague, all encompassing conspiracy theory is a psychological recruitment tool, not a factual claim. Its purpose is to induce alienation and anxiety by telling people everything they know is a lie, making them susceptible to your fabricated "truth."It is an unfalsifiable fallacy any evidence presented against it is dismissed as part of the conspiracy which means it is intellectually bankrupt and not a serious proposition.In summary,your entire worldview is built on a foundation of historical negationism, projection, and manipulative rhetoric. You have not presented a single fact, only recycled hate speech designed to invert reality, where the victims of Nazism are falsely painted as its allies and the perpetrators are recast as truth tellers.This is pure, unadulterated antisemitic nonsense, and it has no place in rational discourse.

>>16764459
>>16764460
Always to the opposite or always do...you both create the same Golem.

>psychological recruitment tool
What was your thesis in Psychology on? Oh, dont have one? Just a degree is /pol/itical activism?!

>recast as truth tellers
You cant tell the Truth to even yourself, Dr.4Chan Larpenstein...how can the "People of the Lie" ever bring the Truth?!?!?

YOU CANT...well, you can if you inbert your argument, which means Im right and the very fact you reee at me means there is Truth in what I say. Your lies become Truth if what you are is known.

Im in Semitic land, the Emirati of Arabia to meet with the emissary of the Caliphate about becoming an honored guest.
>anti-Semite
Whats a Semite?

>>16764476
Your response is not an argument; it is a manual for avoiding argumentation. You have: Refused to provide a single piece of evidence for your original claims about Nazi alliances with Israel. You were asked for proof and responded with insults and circular logic.In the first place you used every fallacy in the book (ad hominem, poisoning the well, circular reasoning, false equivalence) to attack my character instead of engaging with the factual, historical dismantling of your claims. Mocking a term like "psychological recruitment tool" doesn't make it any less real, it just shows you have no counter to the argument itself. Constructed a closed, circular belief system where any denial of your fantasy is itself used as proof of that fantasy. This is the ultimate sign of a bankrupt ideology. If your idea cannot be tested against evidence and must be protected by a logical force-field that interprets all opposition as confirmation, it is not a truth-seeking endeavor. It is a cultish belief system designed to protect itself from reality.
And finally a strong idea can withstand scrutiny and be defended with evidence. Your retreat into these defensive, fallacious tactics proves that your position cannot.You are not defending a truth,you are protecting a lie.

>>16764490
>posts the Mahdi
Yes, and I spoke, deal with it, hueman-mortal.

>>>/pol/
Go back to digest more propaganda until you figure out the Truth...or never do, and remain a Golem forever. It matters not.

>>16764497
Your attempt to dismiss me by yelling ">>>/pol/" and calling me a "Golem" is the ultimate admission that you have no argument.You cannot refute a single point I made, so you resort to lazy labels, hoping to exile me from the debate rather than defend your own vile claims.
You misunderstand the role you're playing.You are not the brave truth-teller here.You are the propagandist, repeating the same debunked, genocidal conspiracies crafted by the very Harkonnens of history.
I invoked Paul Atreides not as a figure of blind faith, but as the one who sees the terrifying path ahead with clear eyes and speaks the truth to power. My point stands unchallenged because you are incapable of challenging it.You have no evidence, no logic only recycled hatred and a costume of enlightenment that hides an empty core.
This conversation is over. You have nothing left but the same old lies. Your retreat into insults isn't a victory: it's your surrender.

>>16764518
>admission that you have no argument
You never quote me, but I refuted your argument line by line...you never touch my argument because you CANT refute it.

Just "words-words-words" of ego-projections based /pol/ propaganda and ideology activism talking points. You are a living propaganda...A GOLEM.

>genocidal conspiracies crafted by the very Harkonnens of history.
>Paul Atreides
Paul is a Harkonnen too, dunce. Im a hybrid of the REAL Jews too...that movie had much related to reality....YOU are a partisan, you only see your ego-idol and persecute Jesus while LARPing youre justified in murder.

EVIL. NOT-SEE. NEO-NAZI.

>>16764488
>Screenshot_20250826-151341_Maps.jpg
>I[']m in [...] the Emirati of Arabia
Countries that use GMT+4 (standard or year-round) include:
- Armenia
- Azerbaijan
- Georgia
- Mauritius
- Oman
- Réunion (France)
- Seychelles
- United Arab Emirates
Parts of Russia (like Astrakhan, Samara, and Izhevsk) also observe GMT+4 as their standard time.

>>16764674
AI has unironically made you dumber.
>List of Emiratis
>This is a list of prominent Emirati people who are United Arab Emirates nationals.

I checked out the fancy area near the beach, kind of disappointed in it. Its probably nice if youre a foreigner but Im not interested in western inspired eateries like "Buffalo Wild Wings". I would rather eat at Pak Darbar, a Pakistani chain for a taste of Taliban away from home.

why is this always the case?

>>16764689
>AI has unironically made you dumber.
S1: "AI has made him dumber."
S2: "AI has ironically made him dumber."
S3: "AI has unironically made him dumber."
I don't consider S1 to be an insult, because it could be true.
But is S3 an insult?
What about S2?
Is S2 an insult?
Please analyze S2 and S3.
You don't have to analyze S1, if you don't want to.

>>16767400
### Analysis of S2: "AI has ironically made him dumber."

This statement builds on the core idea that AI has reduced someone's intelligence ("made him dumber"), but it introduces the adverb "ironically" to highlight a contrast or unexpected twist. Irony typically refers to a situation where the outcome is the opposite of what might be anticipated—here, AI is often promoted as a tool to enhance knowledge, productivity, or intelligence, yet it's claimed to have had the reverse effect.

- **Is it an insult?** Yes, I would classify S2 as an insult. The underlying assertion ("made him dumber") is inherently derogatory, implying a loss of intellect or capability, which can offend or belittle the subject. The addition of "ironically" amplifies this by adding a layer of sarcasm or mockery: it doesn't just state the negative outcome but rubs it in by pointing out how counterintuitive or amusingly unfortunate it is. This can make the statement feel more pointed and disdainful, as if the speaker is deriving some schadenfreude from the situation. Even if the claim could be true (e.g., over-reliance on AI leading to diminished critical thinking), the ironic framing turns it into a jab rather than a neutral observation. Truth doesn't inherently negate insult; delivery and intent matter, and irony often signals intent to criticize cleverly.

### Analysis of S3: "AI has unironically made him dumber."

Similar to S2, this retains the negative core claim but uses "unironically" to emphasize that the statement is meant literally and seriously, without any twist or sarcasm. "Unironically" is often used in modern discourse (especially online) to clarify that something is genuine or straightforward, countering potential assumptions of irony.

- **Is it an insult?** Yes, S3 is also an insult, and potentially a more direct one than S2. By specifying "unironically," it strips away any possible softening through humor or exaggeration, doubling down on the claim as a plain...

>>16767403
S4: "I'm serious; AI has made him dumber."
Is S4 closest (in meaning) to S3?
Based on your previous reply, I would say, that S3 is approximately equal to S4.
Your comments on, or analysis of, this please.

>>16767404
### Analysis and Comparison of S4: "I'm serious; AI has made him dumber" with S3: "AI has unironically made him dumber"

You’re correct to suggest that S3 and S4 are very close in meaning, and I agree they are approximately equivalent in their core assertion and tone. Let’s break it down to clarify their similarities, differences, and whether S4 is closest to S3 compared to S1 or S2.

- **Core Meaning**: Both S3 and S4 assert that AI has caused a decline in intelligence ("made him dumber"). The key similarity lies in their emphasis on sincerity. S3 uses "unironically" to signal that the statement is meant literally, without sarcasm or jest, countering any assumption of playful exaggeration. S4 achieves a similar effect with "I'm serious," explicitly underscoring that the speaker is earnest about the claim. In both cases, the intent is to present the negative outcome ("dumber") as a straightforward, unembellished truth, not a humorous or rhetorical jab.

- **Tone and Intent**: Both statements are direct and lack the sarcastic or mocking tone of S2 ("ironically"). The use of "unironically" in S3 and "I'm serious" in S4 serves to reinforce the speaker’s conviction, making the claim feel deliberate and pointed. This shared seriousness amplifies their insulting potential, as both target the subject’s intelligence without softening the blow through humor or ambiguity. As noted in my previous analysis, S3’s bluntness makes it a clear insult, and S4’s phrasing ("I'm serious") achieves a similar effect by preempting skepticism, doubling down on the derogatory implication.

- **Slight Differences**: The primary difference is stylistic. "Unironically" in S3 is a single word often used in modern, especially online, discourse to clarify literal intent in contexts where irony is common. "I'm serious" in S4 is more conversational and explicit, directly addressing the listener’s potential doubt. S4 might feel slightly more confrontational because it...