Thread 16764492

Are women submissive because romancing their abusers ensured their survival?

I feel like that is why we all have the sissy genes now because our female ancestors liked being humiliated.
And also why many females now have sadistic traits from their male ancestors.

What happened so that more males are becoming submissive? Do the sexes equal each other more over time? Are we gonna be ever more equal now that there is only one human population and no more neanderthal?

>>16764492 (OP)
Gay AI thread

>>16764523
I disagree with your premise

>>16764492 (OP)
>Are women submissive because romancing their abusers ensured their survival?
What do you think ensures a great degree of reproductive sucess (which also includes not just surviving and having children, but having great children, who will survive and continue to have children and most importantly not be killed or having their reproduction prevented by other children):
>a traumatized rape-victim, who just shuts down and becomes a plaything without agency for her abuser like in Jewish Hollywood movies, when women are raped
>an evil-maxxed woman, who gains such a rush of confidence through her new identity as the plaything of her abuser, that she actively supports him and becomes his partner in crime and experiences his power by being his accessory

>What happened so that more males are becoming submissive?
Democracy. We are ruled by people, who are not genetically adapted or educated to rule.
>Do the sexes equal each other more over time?
Only in leftist communities.
>Are we gonna be ever more equal now that there is only one human population and no more neanderthal?
We are much more diverse now than we ever were before and I am not refering to mass immigration. We are all hybrids of different archaic Human races, which evolved, split-off, evolved and mixed with each other over and over again.

women are not submissive to most men,u have to be far more capable then her brothers to intense this behaviour