Thread 16764861

why is this always the case?

>>16764861 (OP)
Disregarding the religious aspect and just addressing the meme format in general:
Hyper fixation on rigor and nuance is just what people do when they are new to a topic. They are just now getting introduced to the complexities of the field and so good form takes priority over function.

Someone who has no knowledge of the field will point out the obvious, simple, conclusions that might seem "wrong" to a layman who's just having his intuitions challenged and has been trained to pull up a system if equations he has yet to fully grasp.
Someone who is properly familiarized with the field will know when to set the autistic rigor and formality aside in the face of an obvious, simple conclusion.

>>16764861 (OP)
Reprobates don't have a ultimate causus belly.

>>16764883
Doesn't that prioritize old shit over new shit but without a reason?

>>16764861 (OP)
Most retarded cope ever

>>16764892
If I'm interpreting your question correctly, no? But maybe?
Take an example that happens in evolution discussions:
Low IQ:
>[trait] exist because [purpose]
Midwit:
>Evolution doesn't have a goal. [Trait] evolved quasi-randomly and just happened to incur some benefit.
Expert:
>[Trait] exists because [purpose].

The midwit harps on a largely irrelevant detail that adds nothing to the discussion. [Trait] exists because [purpose] is a perfectly accurate way to describe how evolution works as long as you don't extend a presumption of intent behind it.

>>16764927
Can you harp on that without midwittingly plugging evolution into it?

>>16765061
Can you harp on deep nutz without midwittingly begging for reciprocation?

>>16765133
Deep nutz, go to town.

>>16765169
I fucking hate autocorrect.

>>16765201
Turn it off. There's not a single reason to use it unless you're a retarded subcontinental Indian.

>>16765221
... fine.

>>16764861 (OP)
As a pagan I now say the gods did it, but yeah. The universe is this beautiful tapestry of art and it exists, therefore it was made, and us humans sure didn't make it.

>>16765622
I should clarify, I am not indian.

>>16765646
Prove it.

>>16765622
>I now say the gods did it
There is no god. Only God. Stop recognizing fragments as separate from the whole.

>>16766052
>fragments
Those "gods" are demons.

>>16764861 (OP)
It's not. The rate of atheism increases exponentially with IQ and there's no inflection point where this reverses

>>16766133
A fundamental aspect is not the same thing as an egregore. Learning to differentiate between the two would be highly beneficial to you.
I did not speak of pretenders.
For that matter, I explicitly said "there is no god." Your specification is superfluous, and diminishes vital components of the Divine.

>>16764861 (OP)
>Left: OP
>Middle: Person that does not exist
>Right: Person that does not exist
Every fucking time