Thread 16767308

13 posts 6 images /sci/

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 9:12:48 AM No.16767308 >>16767310 >>16767330 >>16767343 >>16767346 >>16767350 >>16767407 >>16767543

SpaceX_Starship_ignition_during_IFT-5.jpg md5: 2ac98a0c... 🔍

Saturn V took just 10 years to be built.
It worked the first time.
Starship is already taking 15+ years and there's no working rocket in sight.
What's the hold-up?

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 9:15:18 AM No.16767310

>>16767308 (OP)
>What's the hold-up?
we removed nazis from science

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 9:50:59 AM No.16767330

>>16767308 (OP)
Different development patterns.

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 10:13:12 AM No.16767343 >>16767347

>>16767308 (OP)
Starship started development in 2018 so I'm not sure what you're on about.

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 10:15:27 AM No.16767346 >>16767349

>>16767308 (OP)
>Starship is already taking 15+ years
by that logic saturn V started in the 20s

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 10:16:37 AM No.16767347 >>16767353

dfsdfsd.png md5: 64c5c2a7... 🔍

>>16767343

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 10:18:06 AM No.16767349

>>16767346
By that logic so did Starship.

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 10:19:00 AM No.16767350

>>16767308 (OP)
No European Nazis involved. Instead you have dysgenic apes running the show.

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 10:20:47 AM No.16767353 >>16767516

>>16767347
Well that's disingenuous as shit, seeing as it was just a bunch of concept shit u til the late 2010's. By that logic the F-1 started development in the eaely 1950's.
Also
>using a fucking reddit poll
Lmfao

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 11:57:25 AM No.16767407

Every Golems Dream.jpg md5: dbd80a9d... 🔍

>>16767308 (OP)
You are never ever leaving this enclosed plane alive you retarded golem. CGI is all you get in this life, which is more than you deserve anyway.

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 12:58:44 PM No.16767454

Saturn V is a fully expended rocket. Starship is meant to be fully reusable. Wildly different levels of engineering difficulty.

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 2:02:24 PM No.16767516

>>16767353
he'll be quoting a chatbot at you next

Anonymous 8/27/2025, 2:21:15 PM No.16767543

>>16767308 (OP)
> very simple thing took just x amount of time to be built.
> very complex thing is taking y amount of time
> what's the hold-up?