← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16768331

115 posts 34 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16768331 >>16768347 >>16768385 >>16768462 >>16768469 >>16768505 >>16768511 >>16768593 >>16768626 >>16768628 >>16768639 >>16768658 >>16768669 >>16768842 >>16770562 >>16770718 >>16771598 >>16774055 >>16774108 >>16774153 >>16774963 >>16776097 >>16776213 >>16776242
>IQ is +6 standard deviations
>cranial circumference is +6 standard deviations
>could speak clearly at six months old
>a psychometrician tested him for a news program and said he was lightyears beyond anyone he's measured
>mother is the ne'er-do-well daughter of a rich shipping magnate, father is an obscure Jewish WW2 veteran who died in Mexico
>went from dirt-poor to a winner of game shows, a successful farmer, and a widely read schizo blogger without even trying
>also a professional bodybuilder
>has a grand unified theory

How do people like this even exist?
Anonymous No.16768347 >>16768473 >>16768936
>>16768331 (OP)
>how do gods chosen exist
through gods grace
Anonymous No.16768385 >>16768435 >>16768936
>>16768331 (OP)
Normal distribution of ntelligence makes this inevitable given the population of the earth.
Anonymous No.16768435 >>16768477 >>16768936
>>16768385
So if you won the lottery it wouldn't be cool and special?
Anonymous No.16768438
His giant forehead is framed by combed back hair that gives a look of an aura that is the result of his intelligence emanating from his gigabrain through said forehead
Anonymous No.16768462 >>16768600 >>16772221
>>16768331 (OP)
he's full of shit though, listen to literally anything he says and it's just word salad
Anonymous No.16768469 >>16768847 >>16770711
>>16768331 (OP)
>father is an obscure Jewish WW2 veteran
Don't tell fucken lies
Dave No.16768473 >>16770801
>>16768347
>through gods grace
Your brain on christcuckery.
Beware, kids.
Anonymous No.16768477
>>16768435
It would be cool and remarkable for me but completely mundane for the planet as a whole.
Anonymous No.16768505 >>16768552 >>16770802
>>16768331 (OP)
>also a professional bodybuilder
He's a fucking fatass, i can tell from that picture alone. Is he one of those guys who buy a belt and claim to be powerlifters? If so, all testing ought to be repeated, because that is something I'd associate with -1 standard deviation.
Anonymous No.16768511 >>16768513
>>16768331 (OP)
>took the test in 1986
>took it twice under different pseudonyms to improve his score
>test was of very dubious quality, self-administered without a time limit lmao
>only belongs to some special snowflake high IQ society no one cares about with 20ish members
>Mensa never accepted him because the test was shit
>never confirmed his IQ through any test that isn't self-administered and with an actual time limit
>is a fat college dropout
This guy's story is an IQ test itself.
Anonymous No.16768513 >>16768517
>>16768511
He got a perfect score on the SAT back when that was a credible 165+ signal, and he finished the test so fast he slept afterward. The dude was endowed with a better brain than you. Cope.
Anonymous No.16768517 >>16768563
>>16768513
>he studied for a college admission test with publicly available material that can be studied for, therefore 165+ IQ
I'm taking another standard deviation away from your result.
Anonymous No.16768552 >>16768567
>>16768505
People change over the course of their lives. He very well may have been a bodybuilder earlier in life but now he's in his 70s, he's adding on the wrong lbs.
Anonymous No.16768563 >>16768571 >>16768603 >>16768832 >>16768852 >>16770723
>>16768517
Based on his age, he took the SAT in the 1960s. There was no internet to look things up. There was no LLM to give lists of questions and answers. You're projecting your life experiences onto a past that was different than the world you grew up in. It's a very zoom zoom thing to do.
Anonymous No.16768567
>>16768552
>People change over the course of their lives.
I'd expect someone with supposed genius level IQ to figure out how to not grow into a tub of lards into old age. It's not complicated. I'm not a genius and managed to figure it out.
>He very well may have been a bodybuilder earlier in life but now he's in his 70s, he's adding on the wrong lbs.
This only happens to people of average or below average IQ. A genius will be able to figure out that stopping exercise will result in weight gain without diet adjustment.
>muh age
Metabolism only drops around 1% per year past 60. There are plenty of fit people who have never been fatfucks in their lives.
Anonymous No.16768571 >>16768852
>>16768563
Nigger do you not understand how education works? You don't need the internet to request the publicly available curriculum, you can do it over the phone, go in person or fax it, I don't care, and it has to be provided to you by law, always been the case, the SAT can't just pull problems out of its ass. You then get a textbook that covers the curriculum.
>You're projecting your life experiences onto a past that was different than the world you grew up in. It's a very zoom zoom thing to do.
You're projecting your cluelessness on me right now. I get it, you're too socially inept to even imagine functioning without a screen and couldn't cheat on an IQ test even if your life depended on it. I'm taking another standard deviation away, you better quit being stupid while you still have enough of them to breathe.
Anonymous No.16768593 >>16774153
>>16768331 (OP)
>obvious case of a mediocre dude who made it his life task to score high on IQ tests
>hasnt produced anything of value
>pretty much living proof IQ is junk science, wide-open to gaming
>even so there are enough based retards out there who want to be "special boys" that they'll swallow the obvious scam

It reminds me of the yearly recurring reports media pieces about the lates "genius baby" who can "talk 15 languages at 5 and entered university at 9", who in the end never amount to anything...
Anonymous No.16768600 >>16768604 >>16768611 >>16774153
>>16768462
you're stupid
unironically
I heard him explain a bit of his CTMU, it sounded too much like the mental model I was making so i stopped listening as I like doing it myself
his shit was full of jargon but I guarantee there's a meaning behind the odd words and it's probably simple and autistically specific, if abstract
Anonymous No.16768603
>>16768563
What do you expect, man? Zoomers are fucking braindead.
Anonymous No.16768604 >>16768608 >>16772221
>>16768600
How many citations does his published papers have?
Anonymous No.16768608
>>16768604
don't know, don't care
the CTMU is a philosophical project anyway
Anonymous No.16768611 >>16768616 >>16770720
>>16768600
>But [for Reality] to be self-contained, it must also be self-configuring and self-processing. In other words, reality must generate and regulate its own structure. Langan argues that the only known system capable of such self-configuration is language. Thus, he describes reality as a kind of universal language or β€œSelf-Configuring Self-Processing Language” (SCSPL).

That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. How the fuck does language "generate and regulate it's own structure"? You'd have to be literally monkey level stupid to not see the obvious holes in that
Anonymous No.16768616 >>16768657
>>16768611
I'd have to see his definition of "language". My guess is he's not talking about Spanish, but an underlying fundamental language of the universe.
In my terms I would say more generally it's a system of symbols, which avoids the connotations. It must (or there must be some entity to) configure and process itself to form the wholeness of the universe, from axioms. e.g. how mathematics flows from the axioms defined for the system. The system itself must be coherent (non-contradictory) and so, from a limited set of axioms on an unfathomably complex reality, it requires an amount of self-configuration to produce consistency.
The other analogy in my system is the author writing a novel. The author does not describe every elemental particle, and may write what seems to be apparent contradictions from error or other, but the system internally must produce a coherent interpretation down to its specifics, and must therefore configure those specifics to fit the axiomatic definitions.
Any external system to calculate such specifics (e.g. the Matrix) has to itself be born from the fundamental self-processing system, or be that system. We know it exists, by the nature of conscious existence in a resultant logical system.
Anonymous No.16768626
>>16768331 (OP)
>How do people like this even exist?
The real kicker is that they don't. He's just lying to you.
Anonymous No.16768628
>>16768331 (OP)
>also a professional bodybuilder
it goes to show it doesn't matter how high of an IQ you have, you can still be a retard
Anonymous No.16768639 >>16768642
>>16768331 (OP)
>>also a professional bodybuilder
That means he earned an income from bodybuilding, which implies sponsorship/rewards from winning comps. What comps did he win, exactly?
Anonymous No.16768642 >>16768652
>>16768639
He did modeling, I believe.
Anonymous No.16768646 >>16768659
did he specifically train for IQ? if he did he is merely a fraud
Anonymous No.16768652 >>16768660
>>16768642
So he was a model now, not a professional bodybuilder?
Anonymous No.16768657
>>16768616
>Any external system to calculate such specifics (e.g. the Matrix) has to itself be born from the fundamental self-processing system, or be that system. We know it exists, by the nature of conscious existence in a resultant logical system.

Human language clearly isnt a self-processing system since it needs to be processed and configured by human agents (and llm agents). This is TimeCube levels of retardation
Leon wolf No.16768658
>>16768331 (OP)
what a jackass liar trying to be a try hard
Anonymous No.16768659 >>16768672
>>16768646
of course he did
Do you even have to ask?
Anonymous No.16768660
>>16768652
He was a model, OP was mistaken.
Anonymous No.16768669
>>16768331 (OP)
>complains about how difficult it is to heat a drafty house
Anonymous No.16768672
>>16768659
I was giving him the benefit of the doubt, but yeah, why wouldn't he be a fraud, sad
Anonymous No.16768795 >>16768835 >>16770707
>take IQ test as kid
>(All IQ tests taken as children inflate results)
>Love the label, his parents reinforce it
>Build identity and brand around label of intelligence
>Refuse any modern assessments of intelligence
>Lie about alternative assessments done with no evidence
>Write manifesto
>Profit off of retards
Anonymous No.16768832 >>16770719
>>16768563
I'm sorry anon, I'm NTA but despite all of Langan's based takes I am forced to assume that he is a charlatan. His scores are simply too unbelievable, he is so far ahead of the pack that it becomes preposterous. His story reads like something too unbelievable to be real. While I would be pleasantly surprised if it is reality, I can only assume that it is tomfoolery due to simple probability. I understand that is dismissive, but it is what it is.
Anonymous No.16768835 >>16768839
>>16768795
Chris Langan is a member of the Mega Society, and thus confirmed to have a super high IQ by rigorous testing of the highest standard.
Anonymous No.16768839 >>16770725
>>16768835
>imed, supervised IQ tests do not accurately measure at the one in a million level. For example, the range of the Stanford-Binet is 40–160,[1] which is four standard deviations of 15 about the mean of 100, so that a score of 160 corresponds to a population rarity of 1 in 30,000.[2] The Mega Society accepts members on the basis of untimed, unsupervised IQ tests that have been normalized using standard statistical methods.[3] There is controversy over whether such tests measure the same thing as timed, supervised IQ tests.[4]
my sides are in another stratosphere
Anonymous No.16768842 >>16770717
>>16768331 (OP)
Wait...what? There is no fucking way he's jewish.
Goybros...I just can't.
SAGE No.16768843
Daily reminder that this nigger has a discord server filled with total subhumans who shill his shit. Whatever he says is total fucking nonsense.

Stop spamming this vomit you stupid fucking subhuman.
Anonymous No.16768847
>>16768469
pretty sure he's not
Anonymous No.16768852
>>16768571
>>16768563
If it was possible to just train hard to bust your SAT score, extreme scores (1580+) wouldn't be that rare. There are many hard-working people, every class has atleast a few nerds.
Anonymous No.16768936
>>16768347
>>16768385
>>16768435
all fucking retards his FSIQ is 110 he sold his soul
Anonymous No.16770562
>>16768331 (OP)
He’s awesome.
Anonymous No.16770707 >>16770709 >>16770751 >>16770757
>>16768795
>parents enforce it

His stepdad beat him within an inch of his life with a chain after asking Chris how far the sun was from the earth and Chris answering correctly. Chris went into bodybuilding specifically so he could beat his stepdad to a bloody pulp, which he did, causing the stepdad to flee the house and never return. His parents despised his intelligence.
Anonymous No.16770709
>>16770707
>Believing a boomer
>Believing a grifter
>Believing a grifting boomer
Anonymous No.16770711 >>16771069
>>16768469
His biological father was Melvin Letman (born 1924, died 1976). I've researched this man more than probably anyone on Earth. Both of his biological parents likely have astounding processing speed, but the genetic picture is murky. I have only found proof of his half-brother being a genius.
Anonymous No.16770717
>>16768842
/sci/'s naivete always surprises me. Folks, this is basic statistics. If your ethnic average is a standard deviation above the rest of the population, your ethnicity will OVERWHELMINGLY DOMINATE among outliers. Like, to a first approximation, there will literally not be outliers on the right tail who are not in your ethnic group. As an example, there just *aren't* top sprinters who aren't West African. You can even isolate the tribe. Anyway, Langan being Jewish by ethnicity should have been the default assumption due to these statistical realities.
Anonymous No.16770718
>>16768331 (OP)
>How do people like this even exist?
They don't.
It's a scheme to make some money on the side.
Anonymous No.16770719 >>16770728 >>16774056
>>16768832
Not to be rude, but you need to have a better grasp of outlier humans. Read pic related, for example. Our life experience gives us a very skewed impression of the range of human variation, because we only ever get to know a few thousand people that well.
Anonymous No.16770720
>>16768611
It's just Sapir-Whorf.
Anonymous No.16770723
>>16768563
>There was no internet to look things up.
Ever heard of a library? It's not just a place to get drunk while pretending to study.
Anonymous No.16770725 >>16770727 >>16770730 >>16771576 >>16774966 >>16775015 >>16775041
>>16768839
If you knew how Hoeflin actually normed the test, you wouldn't scoff. Here are the first and easiest questions.
Anonymous No.16770727
>>16770725
this sure is an easy question, arguably too easy

Can I have my 250 IQ now.
Anonymous No.16770728 >>16770732
>>16770719
IQ is a tool to predict life outcomes. It clearly doesn't work.
Anonymous No.16770730
>>16770725
Let me grab a bunch of colored pieces of paper and do this. Unlimited time, no proctoring.
Anonymous No.16770732 >>16770734 >>16770736 >>16770737 >>16770741
>>16770728
Oh dear me, are you mistaken.

https://infoproc.blogspot.com/2014/07/success-ability-and-all-that.html?m=1
Anonymous No.16770734 >>16770735
>>16770732
Note: Terry Tao scored 760 at age nine.
Anonymous No.16770735
>>16770734
Terry Tao currently does not have any research funding.
Anonymous No.16770736 >>16770738 >>16770741
>>16770732
>only the math scores were used because including the entire SAT didn't show as strong a correlation
>showing only the verbal section showed an even poorer correlation
Anonymous No.16770737 >>16770739
>>16770732
I am confused.
Unless the SAT Math portion is an iq test, rather than a mathematics exam.
Anonymous No.16770738 >>16770741
>>16770736
Why lie?

https://www.appstate.edu/~webbrm/jap2001.pdf
Anonymous No.16770739 >>16770740
>>16770737
The SAT is indeed a (socially kind of acceptable) IQ test.
Anonymous No.16770740 >>16770744 >>16773349
>>16770739
But then why do the SAT and IQ tests look nothing alike. Surely two tests testing for the same thing would at least appear to be similar.
Anonymous No.16770741 >>16770744
>>16770732
>posts image from blog post
>>16770736
>gets called out for p-hacking
>>16770738
>posts different source, asserting the accusation of p-hacking is a lie
let me guess. you're a self-identified high IQ individual
Anonymous No.16770744 >>16770746 >>16770747
>>16770740
Same reason companies give IQ tests that don't look like IQ tests (see Wonderlic). IQ is emotional dynamite in our society.

>>16770741
Is the p-hacking in the room with us right now?
Anonymous No.16770746
>>16770744
I think you are conceptually confused. The SAT is supposed to test what a highschool has learned during his time at school, to determine elibility for university admission. The maths section of the SAT does not look like an iq test, because it isn't an iq test. It's testing how well the test taker has studied the highschool maths curriculum.
If you are suggesting being good at highschool math means you have a high iq, you are delusional.
Anonymous No.16770747
>>16770744
Show the receipts then. Should be easy. Whoever published that data surely would have also tracked the entire SAT and the verbal and the writing sections individually
Anonymous No.16770751 >>16770806
>>16770707
I think maybe just maybe Chris is a habitual liar, what do you think?
Anonymous No.16770757 >>16770758
>>16770707
>after asking Chris how far the sun was from the earth and Chris answering correctly.
nothing screams highest IQ ever like memorizing some inconsequential factoid
pretty sure I knew this too when I was 6 years old
Anonymous No.16770758 >>16774037 >>16775014
>>16770757
Dad: Chris, knock it off.
Chris: Knock what Platonic ideal off, father?
Dad: Got an answer for everything, don't you, you little shit?
Chris: In the vast infinitude of celestial mutual attractions, we both constitute minuscule fecalities
Dad: How far is the Sun from Earth?
Chris: One-hundred forty-nine billion five-hundred ninety-seven million eight-hundred seventy thousand six-hundred ninety-one meters, father
Dad: ... *unfastens belt*
Chris: Upon when shall I receive an award for correctly answering your inquiry?
Anonymous No.16770801
>>16768473
Wrong convex vectors are nt a paper god grace works its just you clamped with sqtanic shit newsflash evil apparently mafia made by jews god geace you are blind teslamarconi heetz volta and ednat msxh shit on you maxh specifically he educated hitler brain is jot the mind the brain is not a computer that's what enuro scientist tell you dukbas christ is real you stuoid einswine was not a scientist nasa is fake as fuck micrometeorites asteroids of those fake space suits that will not work convex vectora arenot a plane the surface you are on is not moving he is not smarter bobby fisher the great flat earther btw
Anonymous No.16770802
>>16768505
He is a fucking fatass he is useles for crusading grace and chiat kike and chrisf cucl means you over analyze shit snd cannot see and rapid process shapes you exist globe container no movement and titus Kayleigh the jews for god a bunch of strange thing happened and they recorded it and there is some real supernatural truths
Anonymous No.16770806
>>16770751
People are willing to LIE about things?
What's next, are you telling me William Miller did NOT see the rapture coming?
Anonymous No.16771069 >>16771326
>>16770711
>I've researched this man more than probably anyone on Earth
>>>/lgbt/
Anonymous No.16771326
>>16771069
Cope
Anonymous No.16771576
>>16770725
Nigger the test is USUPERVISED, UNTIMED and DONE AT HOME. I can literally pay and hand this problem to 10 mathematicians, then go with the consensus. Fuck outta here with this shit. There's a reason lagan isn't in mensa.
Anonymous No.16771598 >>16771612
>>16768331 (OP)
What has he done for me lately?
Anonymous No.16771612 >>16771664 >>16771725
>>16771598
What have you done for me lately? Nothing? Oh, okay. You're worthless to society.
Anonymous No.16771664
>>16771612
>t. sub 140 IQlet
Anonymous No.16771725
>>16771612
>You're worthless to society.
there's no better proof of middling IQ than being concerned with "society". You've been duped.
Anonymous No.16772016 >>16773410
>uses two helps on this question
>pussies out at $250k
smartest man alive btw
Anonymous No.16772022
I have a tiny head this dude doesn't stand a chance at beating me in a debate
Anonymous No.16772221 >>16772262 >>16773352
>>16768604
>>16768462
Ad hominem and appeal to authority, that's what the reddit trannies love doing the most lol
Anonymous No.16772262
>>16772221
lmao
Anonymous No.16773349
>>16770740
nigga, you dont need to look like a ravens test to test fluid. also sat is crystallized fluid IQ which correlates generally with fluid fluid kek
Anonymous No.16773352 >>16773612
>>16772221
>character is irrelevant
retard alert!
Anonymous No.16773410 >>16773413
>>16772016
Knowledge and intelligence are two different things. You have neither the knowledge nor intelligence to understand this.
Anonymous No.16773413
>>16773410
The answer is in the question, dumbass
Anonymous No.16773429 >>16773613
he's a midwit
Anonymous No.16773612 >>16773782
>>16773352
Why would you need to maintain character like a retard in the pursuit of truth nigga?
Anonymous No.16773613 >>16773908
>>16773429
Not midwit but retarded for claiming 200
Anonymous No.16773782
>>16773612
that's not how "character" is being used, retard
Anonymous No.16773908
>>16773613
he believes in IQ BS and has chud talking points, he's too emotional for someone who claims to be objective.
Anonymous No.16774037
>>16770758
Anonymous No.16774055
>>16768331 (OP)
Damn I came to this board to be educated, I never thought you guys would be just as retarded as the rest of this site
Anonymous No.16774056
>>16770719
>I had to read a book about it because books are the only source I will acknowledge
Stop fucking arguing with primary sources, retard.
Anonymous No.16774108
>>16768331 (OP)
> grand unified theory
> zero applications
lol
Anonymous No.16774153
>>16768331 (OP)
Chris Langan is a fraud/ right-wing grifter who is using fake credentials to appease the Christian crowd with pseudo-intellectualism.
There are several videos on Youtube about how blatant his scam is.

>>16768600
>I heard him explain a bit of his CTMU, it sounded too much like the mental model I was making so i stopped listening as I like doing it myself
Holy fucking shit, do midwits ever take a break to huff fresh air instead of their own farts?

>>16768593
Chris Langann didn't prove that IQ is junk science.
The test he took was from a magazine, drafted by someone who is not even a researcher.

This is not comparable to a standardized Mensa-approved IQ test under a time limit in a closely monitored environment.
Unfortunately he is deathly allergic to real IQ tests, I wonder why.
Anonymous No.16774963
>>16768331 (OP)
CTMU doesn't make any sense. Doesn't seem to really explain anything.
Anonymous No.16774966
>>16770725
11 and 13?
Anonymous No.16775014
>>16770758
>Dad: How far is the Sun from Earth?
>Chris: One-hundred forty-nine billion five-hundred ninety-seven million eight-hundred seventy thousand six-hundred ninety-one meters, father
My fucking sides
Anonymous No.16775015
>>16770725
This feels like a leetcode question I would get in a nightmare
Anonymous No.16775041
>>16770725
I think #1 is 9
>1
There is a big 4x4 square
>2
The diagonal square is another
>3
There is a 2x2 square in the left middle
>4
There is a 1x1 square in the bottom left of square 3
>5
There is a 1x1 square at (2,4)
>6
There is a 2x2 square in the bottom middle
>7
There is a 2x2 square in the bottom right
>8
There is a 1x1 square in the bottom right
>9
There is a 1x1 square the the left of square 8

But this is a particularly bad kind of problem to have unlimited time on. You could brute force an answer, given enough time.
Anonymous No.16776097 >>16776207 >>16776245
>>16768331 (OP)
He's so based
Anonymous No.16776207
>>16776097
Chris, where are the massive reports of infertility following the mass sterilization vaccine?
Anonymous No.16776213 >>16776241
>>16768331 (OP)
They don't. People latched onto Chris Langan, especially after he was mentioned in Malcom Gladwell's outliers. But his IQ has never been verified. And his "grand unified theory" suggests high-school understanding of physics. Go read it. It's... utter nonsense.
Anonymous No.16776241 >>16776272
>>16776213
I want to be fair. His writing and speech give midwit 120 vibes. In other words I certainly think he's smarter than the average person, which makes it easy for them to latch on to him.
Anonymous No.16776242
>>16768331 (OP)
TOO BAD HIS INTELLIGENCE COULDN'T SOLVE THAT RECEDING HAIRLINE BAHAHAHA
Mine couldn't either.
Anonymous No.16776245
>>16776097
Is he memory-holing the interview where he explicitly said that people shouldn't be allowed to breed unless they're deemed fit enough to do so?
Either I am missing something or he changed his grift.
Anonymous No.16776272 >>16776306
>>16776241
>midwit 120
>top 9% are midwits
Why not go further? Why not top 1%?
Anonymous No.16776306
>>16776272
Because he's clearly not 1% while clearly smarter than average
Anonymous No.16776316
How do I cope with being a 160iq+ midwit?
All I can do is rotate a potato chip and play funky town in my head, nothing useful