Thread 16769587

Math is unreasonably effective at describing one thing, and that thing is physics. Every single other field of science has failed to be "mathematicized" the way physics has been. Why is this? Why is every static property of the physical world mathematical, but everything emergent and organic that it does, like economic behavior, social organization, morality, weather patterns, psychology, chemistry, biology, i.e, almost everything EXCEPT physics, is all categorically non-mathematical?

>Math is unreasonably effective at describing one thing, and that thing is physics.
Not true, math fails to describe some aspects of physics without manual corrections (or entirely) and lots of math has no physical application

>Every single other field of science has failed to be "mathematicized" the way physics has been.
wrong

>Why is this? Why is every static property of the physical world mathematical, but everything emergent and organic that it does, like economic behavior, social organization, morality, weather patterns, psychology, chemistry, biology, i.e, almost everything EXCEPT physics, is all categorically non-mathematical?
Most of it is mathematical to a great extent. The rest are simply too complex to solve with one magical equation, there are many interacting properties all described by their own math that must either be solved individually for an accurate result (impossible to do in practice) or approximated

>>16769587 (OP)
>Every single other field of science has failed to be "mathematicized" the way physics has been.
Not entirely true, lots of chemistry has been. Some parts of biology. Weather patterns _can_ be predicted, but perhaps not to the degree most people want. Outside of that, you're correct.
>Why?
I think it's mostly because lots of factors have effects on these things. Mathematical modeling works by reducing complex systems down to a small set of variables that have the largest impact on the system. As it turns out, vast tracks of systems can't be modelled like that. So the core idea just breaks down.

>>16769587 (OP)
>Every single other field of science has failed to be "mathematicized"
most areas of life have been "mathematicized" (more commonly called "digitalized", as in described by digits that you can do mathematical operations on), that's why almost anything you do in modern civilization involves computers (that "compute", aka do maths)

>>16769587 (OP)
math is just a consistently defined subset of natural language that declares some recursive definitions axiomatic
as such, everything that can be talked about can be "mathematized"; that's why philosophy starts with defining terms precisely, and why all math starts with a selection of axioms

>>16769587 (OP)
This is just a forced explanation whereas the physicist transforms everything into math despite it not actually fitting within the discipline. There are no real fields, the use of calculus is merely shorthand. There are endless divide by zero, normalization and other such problems.
The way to really come to terms with this: the physicist is the engineer of mathematics

>>16769587 (OP)
>Every single other field of science has failed to be "mathematicized"
Psychology has been "Mathematized".

>>16769868
Most of you poseurs in the thread missed the "unreasonably effective" part and are just saying, very trivially, that wallpapering math on to something is mathematizing it, whether or not the model is particularly effective or, in the case of psychology, even slightly effective.

>>16769887
>Most of you poseurs in the thread missed the "unreasonably effective" part
Because it's fucking nonesense. See the three body problem, any atom more complex than hydrogen, quantum mechanics in non-trivial boundary conditions

>>16769900
Those are edge cases that don't matter to anyone's real life. Unreasonably effective isn't perfectly effective. We can predict how shit works at a human scale well enough to fly and create both electricity and death fire out of weird rocks.

>>16769908
We can't even predict the fucking weather m8

>>16769909
Climate science isn't physics, it's wallpapering the language of physics on to massive, chaotic systems.

>>16769887
>poseurs
Yeah! [sneers] You tell 'em loud and proud!

Mathematical Medicine.
Mathematical Biology.
Mathematical Anthropology.

>>16769990
>Look at the pretty colors!
None of that predicts anything about medicine, biology, or anthropology. You're just using math like a can of paint, fucking a paintbrush into it and randomly splattering the wall.

>>16770001
>None of that predicts anything about medicine, biology, or anthropology.
>You look at the cover page of the papers
>"Psshhh, tssnuh uh, bro-dude."
Stop sucking your own dick and calling it peer review you charlatan asshat.
>You're just
Oh, so theyre MY papers now?!
>NITMB
https://www.nitmb.org
National Institute for Theory and Mathematics in Biology (NITMB). You should stand up in the middle of the conference and say "Tssnuh uh." really loud.

That would be based.

>>16770001
>You're just
Ivan Kroupin
Affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XjxueRYAAAAJ&hl=en

Email him and call him a idiot ass tssnuh uh.

>>16770018
>https://www.nber.org
Hey look, these guys have a website, too!

>>16770020
>List of Sokal Hoax tier word salad
Not clicking on any of those titles. Tell me something your grifter can predict about future anthropology using math.

>>16770021
Ok, Im glad we proved youre exactly what I say you are; CHARLATAN. Youre literally the reason prerequisits exist....
>>16770030
>*glurp-glurp-mrph*
STOP SUCKING YOUR OWN DICK.

This board is shit because yo college jackasses believe fucks like this "must be heckin smart, he dont believe nuffin so he must know better!"

>Tell me
GO TO CLASS, CHARLATAN. I have now posted all three. GO. TO CLASS.

https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Javier-Cervera-39925699

>>16770036
Come on, tell me something your grifter can predict about future anthropology using math. Can't, can you?

>>16769587 (OP)
God literally wrote the Book of the Universe in Maths.
He also made sure to make you functionally illiterate.

>>16769909
We nail weather on the daily.
We really do suck at climate predictions though.

>>16770042
>tell me
Get a job you wierd degenerate, STEM isnt for you, stop shitting up the board with off-topic ego-masturbation.

You behave like a fathetless woman.

>>16770072
Still no predictive math lol.

>>16770042
We will always find plastics at this layer.

>>16770090
Math?

>>16770086
>All those professors and grads are "mErElY cOnFuSeD" but not MEEE!
>[points thumb at chest all proud]
You are mentally retarded, you know nothing of everything, no one this stupid and lazy would understand the proof you request as proof, not merely another opportunity to LARP out a delusion.

FEMALE MENTALITY.

>but they cant...
PROVE IT! STOP LYING AND POST PROOF.

>>16770095
>always
Thats a probabilistic term, statlet.

>>16770095
>how does dating work in anthropology?
>anthropologists don't date
>they're all virgins
>ahahahaha
Ngmi

>>16769900
All of those things have been completely mathematized and it has been incredibly effective in describing those things.

>>16770095
Pretty sure you don't have $35 to your name, but go fuck yourself.
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262610193/explorations-in-mathematical-anthropology/

>>16770118
>explorations in painting the past with math
Just tell me one of your paint jobs that predicts anthropology with math. You can't. You can decorate the past with a color of math you like. This is nothing at all like physics, where you can very successfully and precisely predict the future.

>>16770102
Still nothing, eh?

>>16770129
>Just tell me
You were told.
>>16770131
>Still nothing
You ignored to LARP you werent.

FEMALE MENTALITY.

>>16770133
It must suck to have your delusions of "mathematical anthropology" just completely pierced and deflated. What now?

>>16770136
>delusions
What was you thesis in Psychology on? Since youre also a peer reviewer of Anthropology, Mathematics, Biology, and Medicine, thats like...a pentuple major. Very impressive. Its not often I meet a fellow PolyMath aplroaching my level.

>>16770140
Displacement would be a good guess.

>>16769587 (OP)
>economic behavior, social organization, morality,
>psychology
Statistics
>weather patterns
Fluid dynamics and statistics
>chemistry
Algebra


>biology
That just involves memorization and categorization

>>16770146
>irrelevent post that pertains to the imaginary strawman you hallucinate
Are the "arguments won" in the thread right now?

>>16770157
I'm just waiting for you to tell me something your grifter can predict about the future using anthropology math...

>>16770160
>tell me
He (she) literally cant stop...engaging in conversation requires entering the delusion and playing along.

>>16770161
Nice math lol.

>>16769990
>>16770163
>Nice math
How would you know? Youre filtered the fuck out...

>>16770166
Not paint by numbers, math. It's telling that the difference escapes you.

>>16770129
>damn, i don't actually have $35
Bitch, you need to go.

>>16770173
>here's my math
>ebay.com

>>16770178
>ebay.com
Sars, I for to see the problem is in your DNS. You are doomed to hopeless sisterfucking.
Please redeem now.

>>16770181
We don't want you here.

>>16770183
>fuck, even the darkies know more than me
>racist powers activate
Kek, this retard thinks he's home.

>>16769587 (OP)
at the heart of things in the physics world are empirical laws, things that are observed and cannot be derived mathematically

>>16769587 (OP)
Numbers never change

>>16770187
>>16770181

>>16770205
>wait, mit.edu redirects to ebay.com?!?
>am i missing the joke here?
Classic /sci/. Never change, kids.

>>16770196
Words may speak, but it's Numbers that really count.

Ya'll are fucking retarded. All I had to do is google it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unreasonable_Effectiveness_of_Mathematics_in_the_Natural_Sciences

>>16769819
>that's why philosophy starts with defining terms precisely
wow, that's a good joke

>>16770018
>for once a name-nigger wasn't metaphysically useless
the sky's falling soon, isn't it?

>>16770147
>morality can be mathematically modeled with statistics
>mathematics can define good and evil
>mathematics can determine moral choices

What the fuck is wrong with you?

>>16770328
As opposed to your desert nigger book ramblings?

>>16770374
As opposed to there being no fucking alternative to either of those extreme choices you fucking stupid little prick?

>>16769587 (OP)
The simpler the pattern, the easier it is for math to describe. That's what a ball or a square is, stuff organised in a very simple (predictable; repeating) pattern. And that's why those were among the first things we had mathematical models for.

>>16770147
>Statistics
extremely inexact. It's the equivalent of taking a mold by throwing a blanket on things

>>16770295
>No head injury is too trivial to ignore
How can reason be unreasonable? How can big be small? It's history of science larping as a religious mystery.

>>16769587 (OP)
>Every single other field of science has failed to be "mathematicized" the way physics has been.
You can apply physical (and thus, mathematical) thinking to pretty much anything quantifiable.

>>16770543
Successfully?

>>16769587 (OP)
>is all categorically non-mathematical?
No, it's just hard.
Pertubation theory can solve all your problems (and make millions more).

>Science requires thinking
>Mathematical formalizes thinking
>Common thought patterns turn out to be useful in science
It's not that hard anon

>>16770745
There's literally nothing you can't say that about. Novels, flower arrangements, cleaning your ass in a shower, an ant crawling around the floor. You can describe anything with math. The difference with physics, the 4th word in OP, is that the descriptions are effective, not just cute, passive descriptions.

>>16769587 (OP)
Math expects essentially perfect ideal solutions that can be proven and build from the ground up based on exact information, which is often just not possible.

Even a problem as simple as the three body problem is difficult. Add way, way, way, way, way more degrees of freedom in other fields and you will see the inherent difficulty with modeling a cell or the brain.

Aspects of math may come up in these but it won't ever be to the extent of physics, as it tends to be based on fundamentally simple laws and systems.

I think I've heard some say to this effect except more for physics: the situations we can study with physics is diminished and it is kind of the same reasons: physics wants to study things from the ground up based on physical laws, and detailing all these and then modeling the result is infeasible.

Essentially, reductionism bad.

>>16772311
The natural version of this.

>>16770295
I read this once and i forgot what it is about.
Its true simple mathematics have no capacity to model chemistry. They can still do simulations that are not as clean as solving some differential equations, they can simulate molecules, metal alloys, etc.

>>16769868
>inside you there are two wolves

>>16770072
is this veronica leal?

>>16773319
>is this [random woman's name]?
How fucking sad is it that you know the names of models/porn stars/IG/OnlyFans/whatever...Jesus Christ, man, stop sucking dick and calling it "just admiration".

I barely know my own mother's name.

>>16769587 (OP)
YOU LIE HERETIC! YOU LIE!
If anything its the opposite. Physics has demonstrated time and again that reality has no basis in the absurd mathematics dominated by those GOD CURSED INFINITY LOVING SODOMITES!
Let us be clear.
The Universe is discrete. Something which Physics has been very aware of ever since Quantum mechanics first appeared. But do those spineless Leibniz slurping mathematicians renounce their mathematical sins and beg for GOD's forgiveness?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
THEY DID NOT!
They cling to power in the face of DIVINE RIGHTEOUSNESS. Uttering their sacrilegious nonsense about infinities, negative numbers, zero, and irrationals. like a pack of LAUGHING HEATHENS!
Well not for long.
For we of THE ONE TRUE FINITE FAITH have had enough. The Universe is discrete and finite, and so shall mathematics be, once we have purged the HOLY LAND of MATHEMATICS of those idolatrous infinity scum. We will rebirth mathematics as GOD intended!
Mathematics will become BORN AGAIN!
BORN AGAIN MATH!
The number line will end at MOAN!
Circles, lines and points will swept away back into the non-existent void from which they were spawned.
A new concept, the "FuSS", will become the new atom. Indivisible, and the foundation of all constructions!
*drools in anticipation*
As GOD wills.
Say it with me Brothers and Sisters!
DEUS VULT!
and again
DEUS VULT!
One more time
DEUS VULT!

>>16773337
*belch*

>>16773337
This, but unironically.

>>16774071
I am not sure if he is being ironic. These one true finite faith guys are a bunch of dangerous fanatics. A fucking cult. They will stop at nothing to overthrow the current mathematical philosophy and impose their own batshit insane views on all of Humanity. I have already seen evidence of their activities. At my local library every math text book has had the infinity symbol blacked out with a thick marker pen. and every reference to Cantor replaced with "Sodomite"
Mark my words we ignore these crazed zealots at our own peril.

>>16769587 (OP)
>Why is every static property of the physical world mathematical
Its not, physics is broken by something as simple as Zeno's paradox where mathematical division breaks and fails to be physically meaningful beyond a certain point.

>>16773337 >>16774091
if this board had ID's these two posts would have the same one

>>16774206
>physics is broken
nah, our ability to measure is broken

>>16774214
Yes our physics models at that scale are broken because we can't measure or confirm anything and the values calculated seem physically meaningless as a result.

>>16774218
Well said Brother!
The day approaches when the PAGANS will be forced to acknowledge such truths, at the point of a sword if necessary.
Only then can we imbibe their cantankerous hides with the mathematical glory of THE ONE TRUE FINITE FAITH!
Praise GOD!

>>16774259
No, you people have to murder those who prove some numbers are necessarily irrational due to the properties of the numbering system.

>>16774214
measure=/=existence

>>16773337
Okay, I will bite, you rabid pest
What is this
>The number line will end at MOAN!
and what is this?
>A new concept, the "FuSS", will become the new atom.
I cant wait to see what lunacy you have dreamed up

>>16774284
from my vague recollection of that retard's mental diarrhea, "MOAN" stands for "mother of al numbers", or something

>>16774391
Mother of al numbers... What is that supposed to mean exactly? Aluminum numbers? Algorithmic numbers?

>>16774395
my bad, i mean "all"

This tutorial session of THE ONE TRUE FINITE FAITH is underway. May the Righteous be blessed.
>>16774268
Brother...We are not monsters. We do not "murder people" They are all given a fair trial before being burned at the stake. Then we pray for their souls.
>>16774284
MOAN is the "Mother Of All Numbers". It is the biggest number possible because there is nothing left in the Universe to add to it. And no, you can not simply say MOAN +1 because you will sail off the edge of reality and be eaten by hyper-spatial space monsters. We will however pray for your soul.
FuSS means "FUcking Small Something" It is the smallest thing possible and totally indivisible. It is the true "atom" of the original Greek word. The entire Universe is constructed from FuSSes If we were to total up all the FuSSes we would arrive at MOAN.
>>16774391
It is gratifying to see you remembered our posts even though you needed to correct yourself. Surely no one will remember any of your posts.
But despite this I will still pray for your soul as you writhe in the fires of HELL with Demons poking your bottom with pointy red hot irons.
Praise God!

>>16775982
for a second i read Demons as Desmos

>>16769587 (OP)
The hard or non-living sciences are math, physics, and chemistry. Why didn't you include chemistry?
The soft or living sciences are biology, psychology, and sociology. But nevermind.

>>16776400
>biology
Computational Biology and Systems Biology are forms of transfinite deduction, encompassing numbers beyond computation but are reduced for limited measures for application. On the cellular scale its Molecular Biology and at the Environmental scales its BioPhysics, similar to ThermoEconomics where "counting numbers" isnt the point but finding flows and stop points/bottle necks etc.
>psychology
Hegelian dialect is polarized (Geometric) Developmental Psychology, which directly tied into;
>sociology
The Science is lost in academia, as theyre not "scientist" but political initiators/activists, but the exact same Geometric Cognition applies, and dictates which side is "revolutionarying" and which side is "reactionary/counter revolutionary".

Everything, even Poetry, is Physics and Mathematics. Haikus, Gematria, Prose, down to Greek trilogy and Hollywoods three act structure, theyre formed in accordance to inate natural structures...rooted in Physics and Maths.

You see a painting...I see an Organic Algorithm.

>>16776444
You can formulate a haiku as 5 7 5. You can't use the formula 5 7 5 to predict the outcome of a future haiku. This escapes you.

>>16776459
>You can't use the formula 5 7 5 to predict the outcome of a future haiku.
Sure you can, it will be 5 7 5. Subtract words with invalid syllables, then organize them is catagories that fit structured coherence (larger than normal since "poetic"), then run the "numbers".

See how it went practically "transfinite"? Youre not a Mathematician...are you?

>predict the outcome
The "outcome", what the fuck does that even mean here? It would yield a multi-Dimensional answer, a literal matrix.
>This escapes you.
You know properties of every element...why dont you know the properties of every molecule combination?

What is your field of study, student?

>>16776464
Use 5 7 5 to predict my next haiku. Solutions proscribed by >>16772690, such as tuples of the dictionary or "a literal matrix" as you blindly call it, don't count.

>>16776464
>a literal matrix.
Not only the "intended" definitions for each word, alternate or abstract definitions or interpretations as well, the number grows even larger, matrices inside of matrices. There is no "calculating them all", thats like one of those Cryptography codes that would take a computer 10,000 years to crack...and since its poetic the "values" would all be "quantum", being both, neither, other, and more, at the same time.

In WW2 a Native Amerixan tribesman working for the military use Navajo lingo for coding messages, calling tanks "turtles". A turtle isnt a tank...but it can be.

>>16776466
>as you blindly call it,
I defined it, dumbfuck....Jesus, WHAT IS YOUR FIELD OF STUDY?

>>16776468
And you don't get the difference between that and firing a cannonball into a wall?

>>16776466
>A tuple is an ordered, immutable (unchangeable) collection of items
>>16776468
>A turtle isnt a tank...but it can be.
You are not a Linguist OR a Mathematician....WHAT ARE YOU?

>>16776474
Nothing you said here has any relevence to what youre responding to....YOU ARE AVOIDING THE TOPIC.

Youre just "saying words" and "implying correctness" without addressing tour failures to comprehend.

WHAT IS YOUR FIELD OF STUDY?

>>16776475
>A tuple is an ordered, immutable (unchangeable) collection of items
Oof.
>A turtle isnt a tank...but it can be.
And can you predict by 5 7 5 whether the turtle in my haiku is a tank? Or a pedestal? Or chinese take out? Or Yertle? You can't. That's the difference.

>>16776478
>And can you predict by 5 7 5 whether the turtle in my haiku is a tank?
>>16776464
>It would yield a multi-Dimensional answer,
OOFF....you are retarded. You and this retarded "predict" of your's is utterly irrelevent and blind. YES. YES *&* NO.

What part of "Matrices inside of matrices" has you stumped? THATS THE ANSWER.....A Matrix of solutions!

NOT A MATHEMATICIAN!


>You can't.
DID. AND DO. Its based on Psychological and Cognitive inferrence! YOU ARE LOST.
>That's the difference.
Between a professor and an uppity student.

>>16776459
>This escapes you.
Youre trapped in an infinitely small prison inside your own mind.

That which is beyond it is nothing but chaos and confusion, hence why your desperation for certainty overrides others. Drowning on dry land.

>>16776484
>Matrices inside of matrices
An answer that preëmptively writes down every 17-syllable combination of words in the dictionary isn't an answer.

>>16776488
>An answer that preëmptively writes down every 17-syllable combination
That isnt possible, because you think there is a countable number instead of that expinentiates towards infinite and beyond computing.
>isn't an answer
Given 5 hydrogen atoms, 7 carbon atoms, 5 oxygen atoms....whats "the answer"? Well...the combinations are plenty, a lot, but youre wanting a "one prediction answer" and that is INCOHERENT, it does not compute, youre asking for "ERROR 404".

You dont understand any of this...youre lost, you dont understand the math, the linguistics, the words you speak...dunce is the answer.

>>16776491
I can aim the arc of a cannonball to brain your castle every time. You can't even predict one word of the next haiku.

>>16776493
>I can aim the arc of a cannonball to brain your castle every time.
Because you aimed it, show me the aim of your haiku, dumbass...
>You can't even predict one word of the next haiku.
OH WAIT...I kind of can, "baseless retort, reputation attack, avoidance of responce (-post subject), assumptive, prejudging".

>Jarvice, write up a series of posts in a hypthetical response to Dunce's repertoire in probabikistic order."
...given enough time around you....YES...I will predict your posts.

>>16776496
>preëmptively writing down every 17-syllable combination of words in the dictionary is a prediction
No, it's not.
>the aim of your haiku
Lol, you're not even trying.

>>16776444
>similar to ThermoEconomics
And it wont be words, but effects OF whatever words you used.
>>16776444
>(Geometric) Developmental Psychology
And once I get you "measured", I would be able to do EXACTLY what you asked for...defeating you before you even thought a move.

Youre not "lol so randum", kiddo, youre incoherent in order to not be trapped by your own false certainty....you thought it gave you strength...but it has defeated you.

>>16776502
>>preëmptively writing down every 17-syllable combination of words in the dictionary is a prediction
>No, it's not.
Thats not what it is or what I said...you rewrote me in order to have an opponent you could defeat, yourself.

>>16776502
>No, it's not.
>>16776496
>assumptive
>>16776502
>Lol, you're not even trying.
>>16776496
>baseless retort, reputation attack
JARVICE, POST!

This happens when I no longer write posts to reply to people and simply copy and paste previous posts that already covered it...meaning I checkmated you before you made your moves to be checkmated...

>>16776507
How do you perceive the difference between 17-syllable combos (tuples of the dictionary) and your various word salads?
>>16776464
>multi-Dimensional answer
>>16776468
>matrices inside of matrices
>>16776484
>"Matrices inside of matrices"
(you really like that one lol.)

JARVICE, NOW!
>>16776459
>predict the outcome of a future haiku
>>16776512
>tuples
>>16776468
>A turtle isnt a tank...but it can be.
>>16776496
>assumptive
>>16776512
>(you really like that one lol.)
>>16776496
>reputation attack, avoidance of responce (-post subject)

>How do you perceive the difference between 17-syllable combos
AS A NEARLY INFINITE MATRIX OF DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS!

Why are you posting on /sci/? You literally cant comprehend what I post and rewrite it into something I refute repeatedly yet continue to think what you wrote (YOUR answer from the matrix) is what I wrote.

Youre proving my point, I can comprehend your matrix, you cannot comprehend mine....

>>16776487
>That which is beyond it is nothing but chaos and confusion
So you making in coherent to you but then that anwer doesnt translate back into the equation I made it from....the problem is (You).

>>16776521
Point out where Jarvis touched you on the doll lol.
But rewriting your own cognitive limits into greentext is pretty self-defeating. I'd reconsider.

>>16776525
>Point out where Jarvis touched you on the doll lol.
>>16776496
>reputation attack, avoidance of responce (-post subject)
>>16776525
>rewriting your own cognitive limits into greentext is pretty self-defeating
>>16776496
>reputation attack, avoidance of responce (-post subject)
>>16776525
>I'd reconsider.
>>16776496
>assumptive, prejudging

>>16776527
>jarvis memes usable
Lol wtf. What do you do, anyway?

>>16776528
>Lol wtf. What do you do, anyway?
>"Um...so anyway, you free later, or like...whatever?"
What I do is measure the soul, where I do it is every corner of the world.

Consider yourself "Predicted" (Measured), hueman-mortal.

>>16776530
Describing something that already happened with a formula or a greentext isn't a prediction, it's a decoration. You're a decorator. This escapes you.

>>16776534
>Describing something that already happened
>already happened
>>16776496
>09/06/25(Sat)02:04:32
>>16776525
>09/06/25(Sat)02:31:06
>>16776534
>This escapes you.
>>16776496
>baseless retort, reputation attack, avoidance of responce (-post subject), assumptive, prejudging
You literally cannot stop being predicted....youre....programmed to.

>>16776537
Thanks for the paint job, decorator.

>>16776538
If plans go well, I should begin work on conducting an ultra high energy gamma ray experiment before the end of the year...making black hole equivalent gamma rays, inside a cave, from a box of scraps. Costing me less than $300.

...you could have been the greatest, instead you simply try to appear greater.

>yeah but me feeling ">:3" is all i care about
And it led you to being empty, nothing but vapid posturing in the face of a void you have no hope of fathoming....so "meme" away, little one...........

>>16776547
It outputted a haiku and you're happy about that?

>>16776556
>you're happy
>>16776547
>me feeling ">:3"

https://youtu.be/t7h3UEqdlnY

>>16776558
If the gamma rays flying out of your own ass spelled out a haiku on your wall, would you be just as happy? My guess is no.

>>16776561
>would you be just as happy
>>16776547
>">:3" is all i care about
I'm an adult, I have work to so, such as teach huemanity Word, Number, Form, and Force. I make it look so easy midwits think its not real...

https://youtu.be/vFxGpZc0eaI

>>16776563
You're not an adult lol.

>>16776564
>You're not an adult
>>16776496
>baseless retort, reputation attack
I've probably killed more men than the number of years you've lived.

Youre being too predictable...Im interacting with a child...no amount of sneering from you changes that, it enforces it.

>>16776566
Keeping decorating me in green.
>If plans go well, I should begin work
You're a lazy bum, everyone knows you can't work lol.

>>16776568
>Keeping decorating me in green.
>>16776496
>avoidance of responce (-post subject)
>>16776568
>You're a lazy bum
>>16776496
>reputation attack
>>16776568
>everyone knows
>>16776496
>baseless retort
>>16776568
>you can't work
>>16776496
>assumptive, prejudging
>>16776568
>lol
>>16776547
>">:3" is all i care about

https://youtu.be/UsvX3CAAAmU

>>16776569
>">:3"
You dripped a lot of green paint that ended here.

>>16775982
Ah I see, at last I truly understand.