Thread 16773316

if the big bang made equal parts matter and anti-matter, where did all the anti-matter go?

>>16773316 (OP)
Into the past
The universe is time-symmetrical. Before the big bang there was an anti-universe made out of antimatter when time and entropy flowed backward. Our universe is the mirror-copy of the anti-universe, and everything that is happening now has (un-)happened before

>>16773320
sounds like bullpoop considering we can create and observe anti-matter without it teleporting backwards in time

>>16773316 (OP)
ackshually it didn't make equal parts matter & antimatter - this is well established and well understood via CP violations

>>16773340
>well established and well understood
It's hypothesized, far from as concretely decided as you make it sound

>>16773359
It's hypothesized there are unequal matter and antimatter? Great, so OPs question is already answered.

>>16773316 (OP)
The universe rotates or something idk

>>16773340
>CP violations

>>16773316 (OP)
i ate it up

>>16773333
well, yeah, and in said antimatter universe the antimatter people can create antiantimatter(so regular mater) without it teleporting antibackwards(so our forwards) in time

>>16774049
why did it go backwards during the big bang, but forwards after things calmed down?

>>16773677
Lmao that’s how abstract reasoning works

>>16773316 (OP)
Same place the matter went.
Any other response assumes shit we can't fucking know.
Better question might be "what about the strange matter," but we're not allowed to talk about that or something.
>not noticing that things that annihilate violently don't much like sitting next to each other
I'm thinkin' "hmmm."

>>16773340
Then what happened to the extra stuff if it all doesn't have to be conserved?

>>16773340
>CP violations
m-mods?

>>16773316 (OP)
it turned into dark matter

>>16774221
What? It formed the universe dummy.

>>16774256
No, matter is the universe, but if it isn't balanced out by an equal amount of counter spinning anti-matter, then where are the extra parts or where did they come from?

>>16774266
Same place the matter came from.

>>16774269
No, matter comes by splitting from anti-matter in the process of pair production, so what about the unpaired extra.

>>16774285
>matter comes by splitting from anti-matter in the process of pair production
No. We're talking about the big bang, not QFT.

>>16774287
No, we are talking about matter and antimatter which need to paired to exist.

>>16774303
Wrong.

>>16774307
Incorrect.
OP specifically said to just assume the conditions of the big bang (not to talk about it), but actually discuss and talk about the implications of matter and antimatter.

>>16773316 (OP)
I ate it

>>16774311
>Assume falsehood
>Babble

>>16774190
>>not noticing that things that annihilate violently don't much like sitting next to each other
why do they seem to readily react with each other in the particle accelerators? i don't think the experiments apply additional energy onto the particle pairs to make them go back together

>>16774875
Not him, but it is a severe category error to say particle accelerators and the origin of the universe work in the same ways. Theoreticians just make that assertion because they wouldn't have jobs otherwise.

>>16773316 (OP)
Backwards in time... though from our perspective it all came together in a big crunch to cause the big bang.

>>16774892
anon said that dark matter is anti-matter which seems to be repelling matter. that is a current observation and i am just saying that it doesn't make sense when we put anti-matter together with matter inside a lab

>>16773333
>we
You got a mouse in your pocket?

>>16774344
>falsehood
lol retard