Thread 16773647

> Homer: "I was working on a flat tax proposal and I accidentally proofed there's no god."

What's the mathematical proof that there is no god?

>>16773647 (OP)
What do you ultimately mean by god?

>>16773647 (OP)
The burden of proof is not on me to disprove your claim that there is a god.

>>16773659
Well the common understanding. A omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent being.

>>16773660
> The burden of proof is not on me [...]
That's a boring answer.
> [...] your claim that there is a god.
Where did I claim that?

>>16773660
>umm no chud im too lazy to prove that there isnt a god
we know libtard

>>16773647 (OP)
>What's the mathematical proof that there is no god?
The store’s name change from Chuck’s to Sneed’s isn’t just a plot device, it’s a pun on 'sinned'! Ned conflates "Seed" with "Sin," imagining the store’s founder, Sneed, as a fallen angel who once sold "Chuck’s" (a nod to Chuck E. Cheese, but here rebranded as Chuck E. Heretic). The paper’s equations, he decides, must be part of Sneed’s satanic feed formula. He declares, "This paper reeks of Chuck’s old ways! Burn it before the corn turns to crows!"

>>16773667
>A omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent being.
Creator of All Things? Jewish or Christain? Earlier? Be as specific as you can/want/need.

>>16773648
>REALITY

>>16773647 (OP)
Maybe he made a mistake?

>>16773647 (OP)
God is nowhere to be seen
It is cowardly to hide
God exists and God is maximally good
God can be seen everywhere
⊥
God does not exist or God is not maximally good
⊥
God does not exist

>>16773647 (OP)
God is a misnomer. There is no imaginary skydaddy that will take you to heaven or hell.
Instead, God is a set of tangible things that all other things are derived from.

Follow this line of logic:
-> Logical laws are brute facts (brute facts 'just are', they don't need explanation)
-> "Something must exist" is a brute fact (or else we wouldn't exist)
-> Something must be the originator, since energy can't be created.
-> Something must be eternal, since time is a property of physics and not logic (logic precedes physics)
The only real counter to this is saying that logical laws are not brute facts, which isn't really worth engaging with, since that would render any attempt at discussion useless.

Christians will twist this argument and attach stuff like "Good and Evil" to the originator/ largest set.
But it's nonsense. Good and evil are abstract and ultimately arbitrary concepts.
I can define a property "glorpf" with how many sandwiches I eat on Friday, but it wouldn't meaningfully define a set in any way whatsoever.

So we can conclude progressive taxation is retarded and flat tax is the 200 IQ system.

>>16774146
There's no reason to call that God, and correspondingly if you do be prepared to deal with the baggage. So in that sense christcucks are smarter than you. You should call it The Axioms or something like that.

>>16774107
what if he exists but he is evil

>>16774908
god isnt even hes just going to make everyone who spread hate towards him do humilitation shit then punish them with super natural power then idk cuh maybe make them cease and befriend all the cool people on 4chan

>>16773648
Wrinkly gibberish