Thread 16773801

Why is it that non-ugly men are always incels? That's usually a warning sign. Men aren't supposed to be attractive like this. Plus they're usually mentally ill. Why do you think this is? It's a weird paradox.

>>16773801 (OP)
the only people who are attracted to this faggot are 50 year old men
men are not supposed to be pretty
they are supposed to be manly, strong, even animalistic

first sign of an incel is they cannot grow facial hair
this is an immediate turn off
no matter how pretty you are if you can't grow facial hair it means you have low T and women will instantly reject you

prettiness in men is not undesirably of course, but only as long as it's on top of already being manly

>>16773813
Their female instincts are telling them
>okay, this spaghetti armed little faggot cannot keep a stiffy so much as protect me, I'm going with this other guy who has more to offer
That's all that women see. People who say women see looks don't understand biology or the first thing about females.

>>16773813
>>16773815
I don't like the way you talk. You can't have proper discourse.
Communicating like this isn't fruitful.

I hope you one day realize that this isn't free-spirited. It's everything that's corrupting humanity.

>>16773801 (OP)
>4'10"
>looks like a 12 year old boy
>limber build
It's like God was being cruel with this one. That is the perfect recipe for incel.

>>16773859
Meanwhile this woman is literal harlequin fetus and got married and has kids (who didn't get born with that same condition - which just demonstrates the diversity of life and how eugenics is a misunderstanding of biology). Lizzie Velasquez is an extreme outlier (poor fuck).

>>16773813
Almost all women are bisexual, very few men comparatively. Why? Because anisogamy/bateman's principle making males the ardent sex who are motivated to pursue the larger gamete reproductive rate limited females. Females don't need to be attracted to anything, just a preference when ovulating for masculine traits. Even without a strong preference for such, almost all women will reproduce while men will have greater variability in reproductive success. So the brute force solution of evolution is to pass down attraction to "pretty" traits indiscriminately, meaning women don't actually prefer Conan the Barbarian but rather are willing to compromise on overall masculinity in favor of prettiness. Hence all the gymcels and other traditionally masculine men who have ogre strength and testosterone and are passed over for some 6'2 guy who would look like a woman with a bit of makeup.

>>16773877
No, you just don't understand ansiogamy/bateman's principle and why the sex with larger gametes has less reproductive variance than (in our and most cases) the males. This leading to dysgenics by desperate men fucking a disabled harlequin bitch in a time when such women aren't prevented from reproducing doesn't mean eugenics is wrong.

>>16773887
Does her kid have the condition? Also, while some women are bisexual, however they usually go after sociable guys who are trans. Not "autistic pretty" type men who give off "bad energy vibes" if you catch my reference, like Dylann Roof, who at the age of 13, could've passed off as the "sk8r boy" aesthetic, but given his condition, it wasn't possible.

>>16773895
Here's another case-in-point: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev who never had a girlfriend. Like I said, good looks in men is a warning sign. Men are supposed to be ugly. That's how "selection" and "diversity" works. Men can get away with being fat and ugly. Women can still get laid even if that's the case too usually. Men are "attractive" for other reasons. Notice how women only became attracted to him until after he became a terrorist and cop killer who's currently on death row in the feds awaiting execution. That's because of history: in the caveman days, the most violent men women could rely on for protection. That's hardwired in their biological memory.

>>16773919
Also, they're called omegas, not betas. In nature, betas share thd pride of the alpha. The human equivalent of that would be some bugman "swinger".

>>16773955
Which is also why omegas are based usually. Alphas can be, but betas never. They are always degenerates.

>>16773959
Hell, Elliott Rodger was a "flower boy". This is why Asian genetics in males is a curse.

>>16773964
I've seen porn stars who aren't even 5's. In fact, most porn stars are on average, 6's or 7's. That's normal for people to look. People usually din't go above their own threshold.

>>16773919
But he is obejctively ugly. You have a fucked up sense of beauty

>>16773919
>the most violent men women could rely on for protection.
nice head canon buddy

>>16773981
Ron Jeremy is Jewish

>>16773919
I think he had other reasons he hadn't had girlfriend

>>16773801 (OP)
Omg, he's so fucking pretty. I NEED to have his children

why are people posting the most attractive guys in this thread

>>16773801 (OP)
>>16773859
I used to be a twink. Relatively shirt, very skinny, looked "cute" and like a girl. Women were literally throwing themselves on me. Never in my life again was it so easy to get sex. That's of course ends with your twink death, but if this guy can't get laid it is 500% because he is a complete total retard or (most likely) just lying for attention