Thread 16775401

What are your Ocean scores and how has it impacted your life? Have you made efforts to change aspects of your personality for utility sake?

Example of score layout: O00-C00-E00-A00-N00

(Simply replace the zeros with your scores.)

>>16775401 (OP)
None of this makes sense. You can't be spontaneous without a routine. If you don't have impulses, you can't be disciplined. If you aren't full of thoughts, you can't be sociable. And so on.

If I can't cheese the test so the output looks like a dick or a swastika then I refuse to take it.
>t. 6 gorillion IQ

>>16775412
You're actually a retard.

"Can't be spontaneous without a routine"

You can't act upon impulse without a pre-established set of rules for yourself? Wow, that totally makes sense.

"If you don't have impulses, you can't be disciplined"

Everyone has impulses, do you mean to say "If you aren't impulsive"? If so, that's just as retarded. Being impulsive is the opposite of discipline. Discipline necessitates deep forward thought and not purely acting momentarily.

"If you aren't full of thoughts, you can't be social"

If you are contemplating all the time, you likely have less time you are spending conversing. How is that hard to understand? People who are outgoing are not deploying as much thought with regard to what they're doing and saying, they just jump right in and go for it.

>>16775835
Kek dunning Kruger retard. Here I'll translate. You cannot have trait that is ~X without an awareness of X. People with OCD cannot compulsively clean without recognizing and thinking about dirtiness. Understand? I'm not the anon you just seethed at either btw

>>16775859
The irony.
That still doesn't make sense, you idiot.

You can have X without being aware of X. Having something does not entail awareness of said thing. Action does not entail prior contemplation before said action.

Also, this model is extensively backed and if this is your argument against it, you're ngmi. Not an "improover".

>>16775401 (OP)
I don't remember the exact scores, but it was:
>above 95 in openness
>around 50 conscientiousness
>20-ish extraversion
>below 10 in agreeableness
>70-80 in neuroticism
This is the combo if you want to live your absolute worst possible life, btw.

>>16775835
>>16775871
Someone who always acts on impulse is acting out a routine. Their behavior is predictable. Spontaneity is when your actions fall outside of that predictable behavior. Now spell out your "extensively backed" "model" so we can laugh at you more.

>>16775908
High O&N, zero E, average C&A

>>16776159
You are basically flat-earth brained. This has high predictive utility overall and has been studied for years, wide success. Nice retarded semantic cope though.

>>16776362
>Everything I'm too stupid to understand is like a semantic argument about the earth being flat
More or less what I expected lol.

>>16775412
>>16775401 (OP)
Psychology is a pseudoscience used to justify pushing drugs on children

>>16776376
More of a science than math.

>>16776376
That's psychiatry. Psychology is just talking to someone you're not emotionally involved with who asks the same sort of loaded questions you'd seethe about if they were asked by someone you are.

>>16776383
Psychology [math]\neq[/math] psychotherapy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviorism

>>16776385
Fair, I mean the therapeutic part of it you'd oppose to drugs.

>>16776376
I cannot take any of you losers serious. Holy shit. Conspiracist lunacy is what drives the skepticism in this thread.

>>16776410
>Conspiracist lunacy
>lunacy
The irony omg

>>16775401 (OP)
None of these have ever been useful. All you learn is that you need better organizational and productivity habits and to improve your social skills.

>>16776410
Psychology is epistemologicaly not a science and never will be.

There is no conspiracy--you're just retarded.

>>16776383
Psychologists and diagnose ADHD.
ADHD drugs cause brain damage.

To pretend otherwise is very pseudoscientic of you.

>>16776422
>Psychology: methamphetamine >:(
>Also Psychology: methylphenidate, that'll be 20 bucks a dose kid.

>>16775401 (OP)
"imaginative" compared to whom, Beethoven?

Pro Tip: """Psychology""" is bullshit. All behavior is genetic and beyond our reasonable control. We do not have Free Will in any sense of the word. Our genes dictate our biochem, which dictates our actions. Simple as.

>>16778535
If you really believed that then you should also believe psychology is as real as genetics or organic chemistry. But people who talk a big game about material determinism always end up threatening me with the police when I start taking their belongings so who is the real bullshitter hmm?

>>16778535
>beyond our reasonable control
Is predicting it beyond our reasonable control too? Kek Is that what you mean by "psychology is bullshit"? There's absolutely no way to predict human behavior?

>>16778837
>Predict human behavior
Yes--it's called game theory. That's applied math built on statistics and has nothing to do with psychology.

Psychology and sociology aren't sciences--which is why they graduate with a Bachelor of ART not a Bachelor of SCIENCE.

Sociologists, and psychologists are text book pseudoscience.

>>16778615
>Compares psychology to organic chemistry
You're both retarded.

>>16779166
Indeed, how foolish! Thank you for helping me dismantle anon's naive position

>>16779163
...you do know that several universities in North America alone offer Bachelor's of Science in psychology right?

>>16775401 (OP)
I'm low in openness and conscientiousness, introverted disagreeable and neurotic never taken the test