← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16775414

27 posts 4 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16775414 >>16775417 >>16775418 >>16776150 >>16778537
How to win the lottery
https://www.quatism.com/lottery.htm

Summary:
Following the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, quantum measurements result in a sample of all possible measurements, so mapping these to bits will necessarily diverge worldlines. Typically, these worldlines would converge naturally because those quantum measurements get aggregated out (to outside observers they're effectively the same,) but if you do something like map the results to big things then the divergences can persist and split off new worldlines. This is described in depth in https://www.quatism.com/theory.htm - however this has some additional advantages in the context of the lottery. It won't cover all worldlines, but it will potentially provide the ability to travel to the worldlines wherein you won via morphic travel if you can figure out how to master it.

This is /x/, so likely everyone knows "the lottery is rigged." But what if there's a way to un-rig it? That's what this is aimed at primarily. A rigged lottery relies upon having someone to rig it on behalf of, perhaps multiple someones, perhaps a great many someones in their own VIP lottery pool. What this does is provide a sort of multiversal DDoS attack against a rigged lottery: when the number of people playing quantum tickets exceeds the number of tickets available to parties rigging the lottery the absolute best-case scenario for a rigged jackpot would be a split pot, wherein everyone playing quantum tickets still has a worldline wherein they won.
Anonymous No.16775417
>>16775414 (OP)
>I won the lottery but I don't get any money because the other mes get to spend it
This is your brain on capitalism.
Anonymous No.16775418 >>16775421
>>16775414 (OP)
11, 14, 16, 31, 68 + 21
what do I win? nothing? get outta here
Anonymous No.16775421 >>16775424 >>16775426
>>16775418
Don't share your numbers unless you want to split the jackpot with 50 people
Anonymous No.16775424 >>16775564
>>16775421
nah, the number only works for the person who generated it.
Anonymous No.16775426 >>16775434
>>16775421
The crypto-wisdom is strong with this one.
1) Choose random digit based on the least-likelihood approach,
2) Go to next least likely sequence,
3) Repeat for as long as you can remain solvent.
Literally the best (personal) expected return strategy there is.
You're welcome. You owe me 10% of your post-tax winnings for that sage advice.
Anonymous No.16775434 >>16775436 >>16775605
>>16775426
>least-likelihood approach
they are randomly generated numbers. there is "likely" or "least likely" sequences. all are equally likely.
Anonymous No.16775436 >>16775605
>>16775434
*no likely or least likely sequence
Anonymous No.16775482 >>16775490
Bump
Anonymous No.16775489
Bump
Anonymous No.16775490
>>16775482
What do you want?
Anonymous No.16775551
>turn on the tv
>globetards at CERN divided the 'verse into eleventy billion timelines
>ours is #69
>worldwide happiness increase
>international solidarity
>no more wars, homicides, etc
Ethically speaking, should one lie to the public, if it's for their own good?
Anonymous No.16775564 >>16775567
>>16775424
Assuming that by chance another person uses the exact same number that the wooha-statistician generated as winning number for himself, keeping it secret and following all the orders - would the numbers still only work for the person who generated it?
Anonymous No.16775567 >>16775569
>>16775564
I think so, it would create an alternate timeline where the other guy lost.
Anonymous No.16775569
>>16775567
I will personally make sure that there will be a holocaust against all you new-age assholes.
Anonymous No.16775605 >>16775609
>>16775434
>>16775436
Goddammit, least likelihood of being wagered upon by others. Like too many people pick 1-10-11-20-22-33-01 or 04-20-69-23-46-13.
So you wager on the sequencws least-likely to be wagered upon by others.
My bad. Reduce my cut to 8% for not being clear.
And thanks for asking.
Anonymous No.16775609 >>16775636
>>16775605
You can't fade your own trades. That's not a thing.
Anonymous No.16775636 >>16775649
>>16775609
I know my bets. I'm beating against everyone else's.
3-14-15-9-26-5, right out. Never bet on that shit.
Anonymous No.16775649 >>16775662
>>16775636
Assumes other bettors aren't using the same logic to avoid the same thing.
Anonymous No.16775662
>>16775649
Win-win-win, if everyone picks the least likely sequence it can not contain any of yours since for your bets the likelihood is 1.
Anonymous No.16775775
Bump
Anonymous No.16775788 >>16775791
Bump
Anonymous No.16775791 >>16775792
>>16775788
Zip it, tramp
Anonymous No.16775792
>>16775791
Projection
Anonymous No.16776131
Bump
Anonymous No.16776150
>>16775414 (OP)
it's easy, u just
Anonymous No.16778537
>>16775414 (OP)
if there's a way to unrig it, the games commission would know