>>16775780
>I am extrapolating from "exhaustion is not pain." I am attempting to explain a simple concept to you.
I am the one trying to explain somethig to you, a person evidently weak in semiotics.
You're saying A is not B, but where did A come from into this discussion? By you arbitrarily picking a meaning of a word that is relevant in the current context.
That anon wasn't asserting that being awake implies constant acute physiological sensation and it's absolutely fucking retarded to even try to move the goalpost to this nonsense language game.
The very basis of communication is that you're trying to transfer thoughts through very imperfect signals, but you're supposed to be commucating with the person on the other end, not with the signals that are ambiguous when arbitrarily isolate from the context. Which is to say, you're looking at the finger instead of inferring the reference to the moon, and then dying on the hill that the discussion has been about the distal phalanx all along.
Heil Hitler, 1488, shadilay.