Thread 16778803

>scientists say that when a star collapses into a supermassive blackholes, it essentially divides by zero and creates an infinitely dense singularity with infinitely dense matter, but nothing ever escapes from the event horizon of the black hole
>scientists also believe that the universe started as an infinitely dense state of matter that keeps expanding outwards indefinitely.

Literally what proof is there that our entire universe is just inside a black hole and keeps expanding but will never push beyond the event horizon to the outside of our universe?

>>16778803 (OP)
Black holes don't expand, they shrink and evaporate

>>16778828
which is why we keep finding incredibly large black holes right?

>>16778803 (OP)
black holes only exist in math
https://www.brighteon.com/5e509d24-817d-47ac-994f-74a24abc7e98

>>16779091
Quasi stars, probably.

>>16779091
That's how looking out into the void of space works. It it's not fuckhuge we don't really have a chance to find it. There are orders of magnitude more small holes than big ones, but we can't spot them

>>16778803 (OP)
booba

>>16778803 (OP)
the singularity of rotating black holes are a 1d circle, so their area would be directly equal to the circumference rather than 0

>>16778803 (OP)
Source.

>>16778803 (OP)
i want to get sucked into those black holes

>>16778803 (OP)
Source? I probably need 2000 gallons.

>>16778803 (OP)
>Literally what proof is there that our entire universe is just inside a black hole and keeps expanding but will never push beyond the event horizon to the outside of our universe?
First off this is theoretical physics and cosmology, so there isn't much in terms of definite proof, but there are hints here and there than we can make guesses on.

As OP points out :
>the universe started as an infinitely dense state of matter that keeps expanding outwards indefinitely.
So the he Big Bang is essentially similar to a white hole, the theoretical other end of a black hole.
But recent findings about the expansion rate of the Universe points us towards the idea of cyclical Big Crunch model rather than an ever-expanding model like we previously thought.

So you have 2 theories that I'd like to think fit the current data we have :
- The Big Crunch
- The Black Hole Universe hypothesis
So the second one theorizes that universes could exist inside of a black hole's event horizon, or on the other side of the singularity.
So our universe could be contained inside a "parent" black hole and could spawn "child" universes in the form of the black holes in our universe.

This even leads to the Fecund Universe Hypothesis which suggests that black holes can act as mechanisms for universes to "reproduce" and "evolve" by creating new universes with slightly altered physical constants. Over time, this process selects for universes whose parameters maximize black hole production, which coincidentally also favor conditions suitable for life.

Again, these are mostly theoretical and hypothetical.
The topic is highly debated, new experiments and data come up periodically, slowly refining and expanding our understanding of this topic.

>>16778803 (OP)
The whore on the right looks diseased.