← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16788673

18 posts 8 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16788673 [Report] >>16788709 >>16788716 >>16788844 >>16788915 >>16788972
theoretically speaking, what are some immoral experiments that would immediately increase our knowledge base?
Anonymous No.16788682 [Report] >>16788705
Put a frog poster in a room with a random sample of 4chan posters. Make the frogposter easily identifiable.
See how the 4chan posters react to the frogposter and then have them answer questions as to why they reacted such a way.
I've always noticed the frog inciting much violent responses on this website, would be nice to pinpoint why.
>why is at 'immoral'
Because the frogposter will likely be beaten, crippled, or killed.
Anonymous No.16788697 [Report]
Replicate this study but with conscious patients being killed under varying conditions.
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/jpm.2009.0159

Measure differences in how the brain responds, near-death, to a more traumatic/violent killing compared to quicker/relatively painless death.
Anonymous No.16788705 [Report]
>>16788682
>Because the frogposter will likely be beaten, crippled, or killed.
Anonymous No.16788709 [Report] >>16788711
>>16788673 (OP)
Use death row inmates for medical experiments, doing away with any and all ethical considerations.
Anonymous No.16788711 [Report] >>16788715 >>16788974
>>16788709
I think OP was asking what kind of medical experiments.
What are some ideas that you could do to these inmates that would actually give use useful information?
Anonymous No.16788715 [Report]
>>16788711
Oh, I missed that detail. I don't have any specific ideas off the top of my head, but I have had some in the past that the subjects very likely wouldn't recover from.
Anonymous No.16788716 [Report] >>16788717
>>16788673 (OP)
TND and TKD. scientifically of course
Anonymous No.16788717 [Report] >>16788724 >>16788898
>>16788716
How is that unethical?
Anonymous No.16788724 [Report]
>>16788717
well it technically would be anti semitic to carry out either experiment.
Anonymous No.16788844 [Report] >>16788859
>>16788673 (OP)
Exterminating retards.
Its simple.
Agree upon a test which measures intelligence, general knowledge and critical thinking skills. Set the pass rate so only half the population pass the test. Anyone who fails the tests gets turned into fertilizer. Bumper crops!
Follow this up with composting the lazy, the mentally ill, anyone belonging to a religion.
Repeat this every twenty years.
Moon base within this century. Interstellar space flight next century. Mass colonization of the galaxy soon after that.
Anonymous No.16788859 [Report]
>>16788844
>anyone belonging to a religion.
*tip*
Anonymous No.16788862 [Report]
what is humanity's goal of information aggregation? is it to sell a new product?
Anonymous No.16788898 [Report]
>>16788717
because of who is on the ethics committee
Anonymous No.16788915 [Report] >>16788969
>>16788673 (OP)
state mandated girlfriends

let's see if it actually works
Anonymous No.16788969 [Report]
>>16788915
cool it with the misogyny christ cuck
Anonymous No.16788972 [Report]
>>16788673 (OP)
How about this version:
What knowledge, were it to come out, would indicate someone somewhere doing something horrible?
Anonymous No.16788974 [Report]
>>16788711
The only valid dietary study was the one in Minnesota in WWII where they used conscientious objectors as test subjects. Their food intake was strictly controlled and since they were under armed guard, there was no cheating.
Imagine what we could learn about diet and nutrition if we could put test subjects through the same experimental conditions where cheating was impossible.