There are only a few reasons anyone would ever take a real IQ test. The most numerous one is because some government agency thinks they are retarded. The next one is because they are so infatuated with themselves and statistics and society standing that they pay the 300 dollars themselves.
>>16819342 (OP)
you dont have the iq of 120 thats the problem or youd master every subject there is and be an expert with many discoveries so saybau this is really pissing me off stupid fucking faggots claiming 120+ FSIQ and think lying is ok i tell the truth about my iq because its high
>>16819342 (OP)
Don’t obsess over your IQ. There’s other things in life that matter in life besides IQ: Morality, patience, communcation, discipline, etc.
I have no clue what my IQ is.
>>16819571
You are incredibly—profoundly, even—retarded and I don't believe what your online IQ test says. If you believe an IQ of 120 would net 'mastery of all subjects' that is enough information for a binary thinking midwit as yourself to be thoroughly discredited.
>>16819407
correlation is really powerful
anecdotally, yes, i have ADHD and autism, and have known my IQ from a medically administered test since I was in middle school
arguably this also proves my parents are retarded for telling it to me and hoping that fixes things automatically
>>16819342 (OP)
those who do have that intellect left the cities OP, they foresaw the fall of a nation and prepared accordingly by leaving the game.
you simply don't play a rigged game.
so if you ain't vaxxed and didn't fuck or touch a vaxxed "person" then leave the city and go hermit.
>>16819684
The average IQ among mathematicians at Oxford s 128. Ted Kaczynski's IQ was 136 (99th percentile) with a PIQ of 124 (95th percentile)
Seethe and dilate
>>16819364 >plumber >get certified >train jeets and mexicans >pay them pennies >cash only >no documents >mobile office >burner phone >give them fake name of business >collect money without ever touching a single pipe
Why aren't more people doing this?
>>16819342 (OP)
The IQ discourse on this board is exhausting. Yes, you can succeed. No, you cannot succeed without effort. Yes, if your IQ was high enough to succeed without effort you'd have done it by now. No, being at a 120 range does not justify self-pitying defeatist insecurity polluting the board.
Grow up and open a textbook and work. Stop posting this childish shit.
Yes, we need baristas.
We will talk slow so you can take our order.
If things get complicated use the pictures showing the ingredients to guide you.
You can do it... we believe in you
>>16821242
the barista at my office cafeteria remembers everyone's coffee since the first time they ordered
thousands of coffees of every nobody at the office from their very first coffee
I doubt OP can do that
>>16819342 (OP)
The biggest thing standing in your way isn't your IQ, it's the fact that you've apparently internalised /sci/ memes about how everyone with an IQ below 145 is legally retarded if you're even asking whether it's possible to succeed with an IQ a full standard deviation above the mean in the first place. It'll be harder for you than it would be for people with higher IQs, but if you think you can't succeed because people smarter than you exist you may as well give up right now.
>>16819675
Spoken like a true retard! Go back to your bread and circuses and let the adults talk. I heard there's one of those banal sports games on that you people seem to obsess over, go entertain yourself.
>>16819407
nah there is often an argument that will be settled with iq. when you are in the mid fucking west and a whole room of people want to not believe you or believe some 120iq schmuck you can actually pull out an iq or sat score and shut them up
I am only engaging in this dialogue because I am being possesed by a demon but their are specific jobs you can thrive in with an IQ of 120. Personally, I wouldnt let an IQ score hold so much weight because it is limited in understanding mental capacities along with it causing mental anguish or as something to lean on when things dont go your way.
>>16819701
their g is lower even fucking idiot why do you believe public data like a moron do you know what a g of 128 means if MR had that type of granularity in pro tests? their FSIQs would be 102+ which is genius in the heteronormative sense of all things learning rate
>>16821532
lmfao you talk like those old poor, low iq, "wise" old people lmaooooo shut the fuck up im young and wiser since iq and wisdom correlate repulsive to popular belief
>>16819407
i know because i had to do it to be diagnosed with ADHD. i scored in the 25th percentile in both working memory and processing speed which ended up fucking my FSIQ