Is there any truth to this?
>is there any thing out there about making pocket world dimensions a reality.?
I know lucid dream is one way
But can it be a kinda of world that have real effect not just. A dream? Say if you eat in that world u will be actually had real food not just some dream?
You just have to shrink a volume of space containing a world down to the desired size (along with the space it occupies) and create a traversible conduit to it linking the two (pocket world and real-world) spatial dimensions while canceling out the electrogravitic potentials between the two. This can be done with magnets utilizing the correct geometry and strength.
Study aether theory, classical electrodynamics, and electrogravitics until you've unified them with relativity, quantum mechanics, and quantum electrodynamics. Sorry I can't be more specific, but there's no info unifying them publicly available (the one point worth noting: they are ALL right within their relevant context, they are subsets of a greater theory so ignore basically everything stating that any one/two of them is/are the solution to everything.) Actual physics has no bounds, the theory only grows because physics is infinite and the most you can do is reconcile sub-theories and expand the scope of the context you're defining. The big pieces you need to pay attention to in order to unify them are the origin of inertia, the nature of perception, and the reasons why we believe time exists.
>You can read Langan he unifies it in the informational universe theory.
No he doesn't. He lays out a way in which consciousness expounds from first principles, there is no "theory of everything" because physics is infinite, it cannot be defined in full, only contextually.
>But it is information, shit we can measure learn or perceive, regardless if we have seen it yet or not.
It's not. There's more to the universe than what our perceptions constrain us to. "It's information" is (ironically) the materialist view.
I know lucid dream is one way
But can it be a kinda of world that have real effect not just. A dream? Say if you eat in that world u will be actually had real food not just some dream?
You just have to shrink a volume of space containing a world down to the desired size (along with the space it occupies) and create a traversible conduit to it linking the two (pocket world and real-world) spatial dimensions while canceling out the electrogravitic potentials between the two. This can be done with magnets utilizing the correct geometry and strength.
Study aether theory, classical electrodynamics, and electrogravitics until you've unified them with relativity, quantum mechanics, and quantum electrodynamics. Sorry I can't be more specific, but there's no info unifying them publicly available (the one point worth noting: they are ALL right within their relevant context, they are subsets of a greater theory so ignore basically everything stating that any one/two of them is/are the solution to everything.) Actual physics has no bounds, the theory only grows because physics is infinite and the most you can do is reconcile sub-theories and expand the scope of the context you're defining. The big pieces you need to pay attention to in order to unify them are the origin of inertia, the nature of perception, and the reasons why we believe time exists.
>You can read Langan he unifies it in the informational universe theory.
No he doesn't. He lays out a way in which consciousness expounds from first principles, there is no "theory of everything" because physics is infinite, it cannot be defined in full, only contextually.
>But it is information, shit we can measure learn or perceive, regardless if we have seen it yet or not.
It's not. There's more to the universe than what our perceptions constrain us to. "It's information" is (ironically) the materialist view.
