Thread 16831279

Why does nobody take Geometric Unity seriously?

>>16831279 (OP)
Because the people who point out flaws in this kike’s theory get excommunicated by his cargo cult. Ironic, considering how he accuses academia of this exact behavior.
https://timothynguyen.org/geometric-unity/

he's talking about symptoms. Here's the real deal:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfP5BgOz97U

>>16831281
fpbp

>>16831279 (OP)
Because it's not a serious theory.

Math is the shape everything takes. Even a nothing - a zero - becomes a one. He’s not wrong that it’s all geometrically united. How could he be?

>>16831279 (OP)
read the "paper"

>>16831279 (OP)
First of all, how dare you?

Scientists should fear this man. Not sure why he fears Witten though.

>>16832017
>Not sure why he fears Witten though.
Two reasons:
1) Witten is very intelligent, like an order of magnitude more intelligent than others in the field of theoretical physics. This is intimidating to many ego driven midwit physicists.
2) Witten is pushing a version of quantum gravity that is clearly not leading anywhere, and Witten knows this. This is scary since why would Witten of his intellect purposely push forward such a version of quantum gravity.

It makes no preductions, its just babble.

I'd pay real money for schizos to stop sucking this guy's dick on every board.

>>16832472
>I'd pay real money for schizos to stop sucking this guy's dick on every board.

It's probably just him posting.

>>16831281
>timothynguyen
Hark, that try-hard?! I remember tearing through a few of his papers a couple years ago. The phrases "idk, maybe it could work" and "it was too complicated but did work" were in them.

Maybe he should do some Lagrangians and show people where exactly the issue is l.

>>16832543
this is actually quite plausible - rapport and mandlbaur were both massive samefags, wouldn't surprise me if most schizos are.

>>16832472
Sean Carrol lost

>he constantly ignores criticism of his theory >>16831281
>he does not propose experiments to falsify his theory
>he does not want his theory to be peer-reviewed and did not hand it in to a journal
>he has connections to Peter Thiel's network and is trying to push some anti-academia political agenda on non-scientific platforms like Joe Rogan or Pierce Morgan
Erik Weinstein is not a serious person.

>>16832472
same. It's almost as bad as that em-drive bullshit was 10 years ago, or the LK-99 after that, or wolfram schizoid musings

>>16832472
You’re gay

>>16831431
kek

>>16835158
no, he's serious, seriously a piece of shit

>>16831279 (OP)
If you read the paper, it makes you doubt he himself takes it seriously.
>i had a proof for this central thing but i lost it or something lol
>i'm an entertainer anyway
>uuh *lots of handwaving* it's the theory of everything *more handwaving* isn't it obvious?

>>16831279 (OP)
The Observerse is real and if you deny it, you're just pandering to the Distributed Idea Suppression Complex that has been causing poor Dr Eric Weinstein so much grief. He deserves a nobel prize and so does his wife and brother. Him and his wife also wrote an amazing paper on how to properly calculate CPI and GDP. Economists have been doing it wrong all the time but the Weinstein couple have it all figured out.

Unlike other anons in this thread, I'd say it's probably more incompetence than anything. He just spent so much time promoting himself as a serious physicist with a theory of everything so badly he forgot that he hasn't actually made anything of value. Now he's just shat out his current "theory" and tried to forget about it.

>>16840011
>incompetence
The guy certainly knows his differential geometry. It's his Jewishness more than anything. The main character syndrome made him do this for narcissistic self-approval more than anything. Kind of like Einstein spent his late career working on a schizo theory of everything that no one took seriously.

>>16836141
wolfram is 10x more credible than this fraud mostly cause he just steals ideas from qualified people and makes them his own

>>16831279 (OP)
not saying his theory is correct but he would be getting a lot more positive attention if he it weren't for the Intellectual Dark Web stuff

>>16840031
What kind of positive attention can it get? What problem does geometric unity solve? How is it a theory of everything?

>>16840130
It has math symbols in it. Isn't that enough to make a theory of everything

>>16840016
What if Einstein's work with Kaluza at IAS is what they are trying to hide?

>>16840031
it already got more attention than it deserves *because* of the Intellectual Dark Web stuff.
His inane rambling about how Big Physics is keeping him down got a bunch of physicists to actually read his "paper", and it was laughable.

>>16840018
Modern day Gauss

Literally "Hey babe, everyone is wrong but im right": The Person

lol

>zero papers to his name
>wants to play with the big boys

>>16840372
When you paper is meant to refute millions of others its supposed to "just show up out of nowhere". and be by someone looking at the whole thing from a radically different perspective.

I did that for Biology. Whole field, even into Medical, is foundationally changing from Molecular (mechanistic, Chemistry based Philosophy approach) to Cognitive (intuitive, empathic, pre-chemical (Electro/Magnetic as a Bio-spectrum that can induce chemical changes internally).

This started with Jordan Peterson showing how retarded the campus is, then Bret Weinstein who worked in Evolutionary Biology where Richard Dawkins is failing to grasp future results of his choices. Eric just did in Physics and Mathematics, though he does see himself too much of a "Research Scientist". He isnt outside of his Physics/Maths works. Connecting Physics/Maths to Psychology and Political solutions is more than "merely scientific research".

No one can say its "outlandish", Corona showed the whole world theyre all retarded sheep who pay money to pass tests for paychecks.

>>16840372
most jeet post I have ever seen in my life

Retard here, so consider that when answering my question.
>What are the odds that he is correct and indeed the US government is actively hiding physics that would make "warp" travel possible?
I have read some interesting things that suggest this could be true, and it has something to do with Einstein/Godel/VonNeumann joint work at the IAS in late 30's and early 40's. (((Allegedly))) it has something to do with Machian interpretations of GR and rotating universe work by Godel. The implications are that it's not anti-gravity, but inertial reduction due to some sort of "shielding effect" that has to do with a rotating universal frame of reference. Is this retarded?

>>16840600
Any links you can share?

Speaking of FTL, Weinstein says that his Geometric Unity paper can lead to faster than light travel. Can someone explain how it would do that? I saw this
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2jBuwnabZ5I
Growing and shrinking rulers will lead to FTL?

>>16840675
GU predicts FTL because FTL sells

>>16840675
Sort of sounds like altering the relative permeability and permittivity of the vacuum maybe? The way I understand it, FTL is functionally impossible; HOWEVER, what IS possible is altering the impedance of free space to artificially raise or lower the speed of light. You cannot go faster than light, but you can move the goalposts to make the maximum propagation rate of C faster.

>>16831279 (OP)
>arrogant presumptuous douche nozzle
most people would punch this stupid fuck kike in his face until he shuts the fuck up for good..