Thread 16831532

lol, science preaches that there is such a thing as a 3D hole, where things can fall in it from every direction

>>16831532 (OP)
>we took the first picture of a black hole!!
>oh btw the picture looks like absolute shit
>like a literal 5 year old could have shit this out
>also its not actually a picture just a bunch of algorithms we used to simulate a picture
>please worship this brave and stunning female scientist who showed up to meetings and occasionally contributed a line of code that one of the men fixed later.

stop samefagging your own post

>>16831532 (OP)
it's a 2D hole

>>16831532 (OP)
Because Söyence is full of bullshittery and made up nonsense. Modern Atheist Redditors are as religious and faithful yes men if not worse than a Theists.
I say this unironically btw this is currently the problem in science thats why its sóyence
they believe in literal fantastical magical shit parroted by a >>16832223 retarded ape entretainer unironically

>>16832256
more like its a theoretical concept and it doesnt fucking exist irl, it was made the fuck up
thank me for my stupid theory give me my 1 million chud

>>16831532 (OP)
>>16832260
it's not a hole. the name is a misnomer. it's just a really dense star with an escape velocity greater than the speed of light

imagine not being able to comprehend this basic concept. go read a physics textbook before sharing any more worthless opinions on this porn site

>>16832337
wormhole?

>>16832337
>with an escape velocity greater than the speed of light
>go read a physics textbook
lol
why is it that when a quasar has an apparent recession velocity 5x c it is still visible but highly redshifted while when "muh black hole" has an escape velocity greater than the speed of light it becomes magically invisible?
is it like that because you're too lame brained to apply logic consistently or because you've never studied physics not even first semester freshman physics?

>>16832337
its a singularity, not a star

>>16831532 (OP)
Post hole that baked cookies while white men computed picrelated hole.

>>16831532 (OP)
its like a inside out atom anonymous
bonus question is atom which is backwards thst the other ion is in the center if that would even work
i dont think its a 3d hole if its even real

>>16831532 (OP)
if nothing can escape from within the event horizon, how can the stuff inside the event horizon affect what is outside the event horizon?

>>16832256
regardless, it's a hole that needs to be fucked

>>16833937
Physicists helped with the story on Interstellar to make it realistic and they say if you go in a black hole you end up in your daughters bookshelf and can simply communicate with people by knocking books off the shelf.

>>16833964
It makes your dick longer too

>>16832222
she was cute though

>>16834386
ok, thanks

>>16831532 (OP)
We're all well aware of your mother OP no need to remind us

>>16832630
>why is it that when a quasar has an apparent recession velocity 5x c it is still visible but highly redshifted while when "muh black hole" has an escape velocity greater than the speed of light it becomes magically invisible?
you can still see something if it's receding faster than light. the light will eventually reach you. black holes are different since the geodesics all point toward the 'singularity' inside
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant_on_a_rubber_rope

>>16832693
singularities don't exist, it's just maths. if you guys wanna focus on popsci bullshit that's actually where you start. there's a whole consortium of fake bullshit like wormholes and time travel and string theory and the universe splitting in two for every decision made that's peddled as real science by science communicators. black holes existing is solid science

>>16832630
that's why the event horizon and edge of the observable universe are both called 'horizons'. they behave the same. any light you see from that quasar was emitted a long time ago. but even if a quasar's velocity is 5x c you'd still see it. but you don't see it when the expansion of space is accelerating fast enough

>>16832693
singularities don't exist, it's just maths. if you wanna mock popsci bullshit then start there. but black holes existing is rock solid even if we don't understand what's going on inside

>>16836014
>but black holes existing is rock solid
it isn't, its a facetious concept and you're ignorant of fairly basic physics if you don't realize that. the black hole idea was based on the idea that neutrons are a fundamental particle and that idea was disproved well over half a century ago. when it was disproved then the entire black hole premise was also disproved. modern physics their says that they don't exist and there is no observational evidence saying otherwise.
you think they exist because you saw them in some gay anime cartoon and thats your only reason for thinking they exist, that and your lack of understanding of freshman level physics

>>16836014
>black holes do exist
>>16836037
>black holes don't exist

both of you are wrong

>>16836037
the idea of black holes literally goes back centuries before we knew anything about subatomic particles. from the time of newton people speculated about 'dark stars' whose escape velocity goes above c

>>16831532 (OP)
it's a sphere not a hole