Thread 16834722

Materialism holds that automatic skills come from physical organization, not prior knowledge.

Build field metres and sersors, I think the current is the gaps between the significant components.. Or something

>>16834728
Sensors*

Gaps... Do we stretch the copper? In wire

>>16834729
And we dip in two in chemicals .. Can u dip in several more and build a handed circuit!

Heavy duty and dangerous.. BTW dad said

Build field metres and sensors

>>16834733
Antenna interface maybe for any stone/chem? Not entertainment unit..... .. Just thinking

>>16834735
Get started, share markets cornered until Christmas..

>>16834735
Audruno

>>16834741
Audruino*

Antenna field sensor.. Lol

>>16834748
Can we rearrange the frog??? Hahahaha dry lava in the water?

Good luck

Money? You sell it Mt. Shasta

>>16834753
To show them its not c fibers

Let's think let's think.. We build a sensor that can show you everything about any field for /x/ and they start working out filliament equivalents.. MT. SHASTA wants proof of c fibres for their lawyer.. We want futurism humanitarian care.. I want invincible.. Psionics.. But no money before proof means no money before sensor

>>16834760
Shasta can pay I guess, just remember do not prove the c fibres one.. Make them pay to see its not true

My Shasta store on Etsy is how, custom made for x

>>16834764
As in call it Mt. Shasta sensors, I have permission from Dr. Drew

>>16834765
Set up Virels and Orthons while Ur up there

I swear the Glasshouse mountains are in bluebook yes!

Set up the guys pockets a bit plz, thanks

>>16834771
Or we never overthrow the archons as a race in the argument

One request about the interface for the sensor, chiral and visually dimensional and descriptive

We can bull in Jan n how's the tv?

/sci/ we would know /x/ is missing metres and sensors, if you have made them already contact Migga for head

>>16834861
And say what you built them.. Yes? Keep it pg rated

>>16834861
My god

Let's build quantum computers? "the output is much higher than expected" so let's build quantum computers? "we expect a trillion x efficiency" OK so let's build quantum computers "we can't prove the power" so let's just build quantum computers "we can't produce it in concrete evidence" so OK like just so can we build quantum computers? "we are getting better results than expected" right let's build quantum computers? "we topped projected increase" Now let's build quantum computers? "we increased the maximum by more than expected" (do u guys know an all the way home recurring at Google and IBM? if so, use let's.... ... ... ... ... ... ... )

>>16834877
>quantum computers
Im...so sorry, Anon...may God have mercy on your wretched soul.

https://youtu.be/Y28JQzS6TlE

>>16834722 (OP)

you have slept at hotels maybe and come to think that hotel is peak physical environment